Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The largest bacterium

Abstract

THE large, morphologically peculiar microorganism Epulopiscium fishelsoni1,2 inhabits the intestinal tract of Acanthurus nigrofuscus, a brown surgeon fish (family Acanthuridae) from the Red Sea. Similar microorganisms have been found in surgeonfish species from the Great Barrier Reef3. As these microorganisms have only been seen in surgeonfish and no free-living forms have been found, they are considered to be specific symbionts of surgeonfish, although the nature of the symbiosis is unclear1–4. Initial reports considered them to be eukaryotic protists, based primarily on their size1–4, with individuals being larger than 600 μm by 80 μm. But their cellular morphology in the electron microscope is more like that of bacterial than eukaryotic cells1,2,54. To resolve the nature of these symbionts, we have isolated the genes encoding the small subunit ribosomal RNA from two morphotypes and used them in a phylogenetic analysis. In situ hybridization with oligonucleotide probes based on the cloned rRNA sequences confirmed the source of the rRNA genes. Our results identify the symbionts as members of the low-(G + C) Gram-positive group of bacteria. They are therefore the largest bacteria to be described so far.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Fishelsen, L. Montgomery, W. L. & Myrberg, A. A. Jr Science 229, 49–51 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Montgomery, W. L. & Pollak, P. E. J. Protozool. 35, 565–569 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Clements, K. D., Sutton, D. C. & Choat, J. H. Mar. Biol. 102, 403–412 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Montgomery, W. L. & Pollak, P. E. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 44, 7–13 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Clements, K. D. & Bullivant, S. J. Bact. 173, 5359–5362 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Saiki, R. K. et al. Science 239, 487–491 (1988).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Olsen, G. J. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 2199–2200 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Olsen, G. J. Meth. Enzym. 164, 793–812 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Woese, C. R. Microbiol. Rev. 51, 221–271 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Felsenstein, J. Evolution 37, 783–791 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    DeLong, E. F., Wickham, G. S. & Pace, N. R. Science 243, 1360–1363 (1989).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Woese, C. R., Kandler, O. & Wheelis, M. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 4576–4579 (1990).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Blakemore, R. P. & Canale-Parola, E. Arch. Mikrobiol. 89, 273–289 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Delaporte, B. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Paris 107, 246–262 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Starr, M. P. & Schmidt, J. M. in The Prokaryotes (eds Starr, M. P., Stolp, H. Trüper, H. G., Balows, A. & Schlegel, H. G.) 3–42 (Springer, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Jannasch, H. W., Nelson, D. C. & Wirsen, C. O. Nature 342, 834–836 (1989).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ward, D. M., Bateson, M. M., Weller, R. & Ruff-Roberts, A. L. in Advances in Microbial Ecology (ed. Marshall, K. C.) Vol. 12 219–286 (Plenum, New York, 1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Biggin, M. D., Gibson, T. J. & Hong, G. F. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 3963–3965 (1983).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Angert, E., Clements, K. & Pace, N. The largest bacterium. Nature 362, 239–241 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/362239a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing