Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning

Abstract

NEURONS sensitive to both place and direction from distinct regions of the hippocampal formation1–2, allometric relationships between spatial learning and hippocampal structure3,4 and pronounced impairments in spatial learning after lesions in this area5–8, indicate that the hippocampal formation subserves allocentric spatial learning9,10. To learn more about the process of spatial representation, we have developed a task that provides independent control of both landmark and directional cues. On the basis of physiological11 and behavioural12 work, this task also makes it possible to investigate the relevance of associative learning principles, such as predictability13, to the spatial domain. We report here that although rats learn to discriminate between landmarks on the basis of their proximity to a reliably predicted food reward, they will only learn to use them to represent its location if they maintain stable locations within a geometric frame of reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Keefe, J. Expl Neurol 51, 78–109 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Taube, J. S., Muller, R. U. & Ranck, J. B. Jr J. Neurosci. 10, 420–435 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krebs, J. R., Sherry, D. F., Healy, S. D., Perry, V. H. & Vaccarino, A. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 1388–1392 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipp, H-P. & Schwegler, H. in The Hippocampus—New Vistas (eds Chan-Palay, V. & Kohler, C.) 395–410 (Liss, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, M. L. & Milner, B. Neuropsychologia 19, 781–793 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P. & O'Keefe, J. Nature 297, 681–683 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bingman, V. P., Ioale, P., Casini, G. & Bagnoli, P. Behav. Brain Res. 24, 147–156 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parkinson, J. K., Murray, E. A. & Mishkin, M. J. Neurosci 8, 4159–4167 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Worden, R. P. Hippocampus 2, 165–188 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Keefe, J. & Speakman, A. Expl Brain Res. 68, 1–27 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Collet, T. S., Cartwright, B. A. & Smith, B. A. J. comp. Physiol. A158, 835–851 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mackintosh, N. J. Conditioning and Associative Learning (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Diez-Chamizo, V., Sterio, D. & Mackintosh, N. J. Q. Jl exp. Psychol. 37B, 235–253 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reid, I. C. & Morris, R. G. M. Proc. R. Soc. B247, 137–143 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherry, D. F. & Schacter, D. L. Psychol. Rev. 94, 439–454 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dickinson, A. & Mackintosh, N. J. A. Rev. Psychol 29, 587–612 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, P. L. & Jenkins, H. M. J. exp. Anal. Behav. 11, 1–8 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nadel, L. Hippocampus 1, 221–229 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris, R. G. M. Cold Spring Harb. Symp quant Biol. 55, 161–174 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Craik, K. The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental Models (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biegler, R., Morris, R. Landmark stability is a prerequisite for spatial but not discrimination learning. Nature 361, 631–633 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361631a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361631a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing