Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Phagocytic processing of bacterial antigens for class I MHC presentation to T cells

Abstract

CLASS I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules present antigens that are produced within the presenting cell or penetrate from the vacuolar system into the cytosol for processing. Most studies of exogenous antigen processing have used soluble antigens, which are not efficiently presented by class I MHC molecules1 and do not elicit CDS T-cell responses in vivo. But particulate antigen preparations with no known mechanism for cytosolic penetration can also elicit CDS T-cell responses in vivo2–7. We report here that phagocytosis of bacteria with no mechanism for cytosolic penetration also results in presentation of bacterial antigens by class I MHC molecules. Moreover, this mechanism is resistant to cycloheximide and Brefeldin A, which block the classical class I processing pathway. These results suggest a novel vacuolar class I processing pathway for exogenous phagocytic antigens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braciale, T. J. et al. Immun. Rev. 98, 95–114 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carbone, F. R. & Bevan, M. J. J. exp. Med. 171, 377–387 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan, M. J. J. exp. Med. 143, 1283–1288 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gooding, L. R. & Ewards, C. B. J. Immun. 124, 1258–1262 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, D. S., Findlay, K. & Harding, C. V. J. Immun. 148, 3336–3341 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reddy, R., Zhou, F., Nair, S., Huang, L. & Rouse, B. T. J. Immun. 148, 1585–1589 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Debrick, J. E., Campbell, P. A. & Staerz, U. D. J. Immun. 147, 2846–2851 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Falk, K., Rotzschke, O., Stevanouic, S., Jung, G. & Rammensee, H.-G. Nature 351, 290–296 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen, A., Jonsson, A. & Normack, S. Nature 338, 652–655 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnqvist, A., Olsen, A., Pfeifer, J., Russell, D. & Normark, S. Molec. Mlcroblol. 6, 2443–2452 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Charbit, A., Ronco, J., Michel, V., Werts, C. & Hofnung, M. J. Bact. 173, 262–275 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harding, C. V. Eur. J. Immun. 22, 1865–1869 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Finlay, B. B. & Falkow, S. Molec. Microblol. 3, 1833–1841 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell, J. P., Muller, I. & Louis, J. A. J. Immun. 142, 2052–2056 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flynn, J. L. et al. Molec. Microbiol. 4, 2111–2118 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aggarwal, A. et al. J. exp. Med. 172, 1083–1090 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gao, X.-M. et al. Infect. Immin. 60, 3780–3789 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rock, K. L., Gamble, S. & Rothstein, L. Science 249, 918–921 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grant, E. P. & Rock, K. L. J. Immun. 148, 13–18 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brunt, L. M., Portnoy, D. A. & Unanue, E. R. J. Immun. 145, 3540–3546 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, J. D., Lie, W.-R., Gorka, J., Myers, N. B. & Hansen, T. H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 7767–7771 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfeifer, J. D., Wick, M. J., Russell, D. G., Normark, S. J. & Harding, C. V. J. Immun. 149, 2576–2584 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McReynolds, L. et al. Nature 273, 723–728 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lanzer, M. & Bujard, H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 8973–8977 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Misra, R. & Benson, S. A. J. Bact. 170, 528–533 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Charbit, A., Boulain, J. C., Ryter, A. & Hofnung, M. EMBO J. 5, 3029–3037 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarmiento, M. et al. Immun. Rev. 68, 133–169 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harding, C. V., Collins, D. S., Kanagawa, O. & Unanue, E. R. J. Immun. 147, 2860–2863 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carbone, F. R. & Bevan, M. J. J. exp. Med. 169, 603–612 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Burgert, H.-G., White, J., Weltzien, H-U., Marrack, P. & Kappler, J. W. J. exp. Med. 170, 1887–1904 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harding, C. V. & Unanue, E. R. J. Immun. 147, 767–773 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeifer, J., Wick, M., Roberts, R. et al. Phagocytic processing of bacterial antigens for class I MHC presentation to T cells. Nature 361, 359–362 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1038/361359a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/361359a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing