Abstract
VISUAL imagery is the creation of mental representations that share many features with veridical visual percepts. Studies of normal and brain-damaged people reinforce the view that visual imagery and visual perception are mediated by a common neural substrate and activate the same representations1–4. Thus, brain-damaged patients with intact vision who have an impairment in perception should have impaired visual imagery. Here we present evidence to the contrary from a patient with severely impaired object recognition (visual object agnosia) but with normal mental imagery. He draws objects in considerable detail from memory and uses information derived from mental images in a variety of tasks. In contrast, he cannot identify visually presented objects, even those he has drawn himself. He has normal visual acuity and intact perception of equally complex material in other domains. We conclude that rich internal representations can be activated to support visual imagery even when they cannot support visually mediated perception of objects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
204,58 € per year
only 4,01 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Farah, M. J. Psychol. Rev. 95, 307–317 (1988).
Finke, R. A. Psychol. Bull. 98, 236–259 (1985).
Farah, M. J. et al. J. exp. Psychol. 117, 248–257 (1988).
Farah, M. J. Cognition 18, 245–251 (1984).
Kaplan, E. et al. Boston Naming Test (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1983).
Riddoch, M. J. & Humphreys, G. W. Brain 110, 1431–1462 (1987).
Grailet, J. M. et al. Cognitive Neuropsychol. 7, 275–310 (1990).
Benson, A. L., deS. Hamsher, N., Varney, N. & Spreen, O. Facial Recognition (Oxford Univ, Press, New York, 1983).
van Sommers, P. Cognitive Neuropsychol. 6, 117–164 (1989).
Kosslyn, S. M. et al. J. exp. Psychol. 114, 311–341 (1985).
Sergent, J. J. exp. Psychol. Hum. Precept. Perform. 15, 170–178 (1989).
Farah, M. J. et al. Cognitive Psychol. 20, 439–462 (1988).
Kosslyn, S. M. et al. J. exp. Psychol. 106, 341–376 (1977).
Kosslyn, S. M. Cognitive Psychol. 7, 341–370 (1975).
Corballis, M. & Sergent, J. Neuropsychologia 26, 12–26 (1988).
Brooks, L. R. Can. J. Psychol. 22, 349–368 (1968).
Riddoch, M. J. Cognitive Neuropsychol. 7, 249–273 (1990).
Farah, M. J. et al. Brain Cog. 8, 147–164 (1988).
Craik, F. I. M. & Dirkx, E. Psychol. Aging 7, (in the press).
Jankowiak, J., Kinsbourne, M., Shalev, R. & Bachman, D. L. J. cogn. Neurosci. 4, 119–131 (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Behrmann, M., Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nature 359, 636–637 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359636a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359636a0


