Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Probing met represser–operator recognition in solution

Abstract

THE three-dimensional crystal structure of the Escherichia coli methionine represser, MetJ, complexed with a DNA operator fragment is described in an accompanying article1. The complex exhibits several novel features of DNA–protein interaction. DNA sequence recognition is achieved largely by hydrogen-bond contacts between the bases and amino-acid side chains located on a β-ribbon, a mode of recognition previously hypothesized on the basis of modelling of idealized β-strands and DNA2, and mutagenesis of the Salmonella phage P22 repressers Arc and Mnt3. The complex comprises a pair of MetJ represser dimers which bind to adjacent met-box sites on the DNA, and contact each other by means of a pair of antiparallel α-helices. Here we assess the importance of these contacts, and also of contacts that would be made between the C-helices of the protein, and DNA in a previous model of the complex4, by studying mutations aimed at disrupting them. The role of the carboxy-terminal helix face in operator binding was unclear, but we demonstrate that recognition of operator sequences occurs through side chains in the β-strand motif and that dimer–dimer interactions are required for effective repression.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Somers, W. S. & Phillips, S. E. V. Nature 359, 387–393 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Church, G. M., Sussman, J. L., & Kim, S.-H. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 74, 1458–1462 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Knight, K. L., Bowie, J. U., Vershon, A. K., Kelly, R. D. & Sauer, R. T. J. biol. Chem. 264, 3639–3642 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rafferty, J. B., Somers, W. S., Saint-Girons, I. & Phillips, S. E. V. Nature 341, 705–710 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips, S. E. V. et al. Nature 341, 710–714 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson, B. & Saint-Girons, I. Molec. Microbiol. 3, 1639–1649 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

He, YY., McNally, T., Manfield, I. et al. Probing met represser–operator recognition in solution. Nature 359, 431–433 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359431a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359431a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing