Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ridge segmentation, faulting and crustal thickness in the Atlantic Ocean

Abstract

THE Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) between the Kane and Atlantis fracture zones consists of segments 20–85 km in length1; bull's-eye patterns in the mantle Bouguer gravity anomaly field2 centred on several segments associated with narrow rift valleys3 have been interpreted as centres of strong mantle upwelling and thick crust. Here I present a map of normal faults inferred from 5 × 104 km2of Sea Beam bathymetry4 along the MAR between 28° N and the Atlantis fracture zone. Faults are mapped both on- and off-ridge using a criterion that distinguishes them from volcanic topography. Abyssal hill lineations seem to form at the rift valley walls through the growth of the normal faults; towards ridge segment ends these faults are more widely spaced, with larger throws than those at segment centres, and often define the boundaries of the gravity bull's-eyes. These two different faulting styles, which probably reflect changes in lithospheric strength, are preserved into the rift mountains. Large-throw faults are highly correlated with the mantle Bouguer highs, suggesting that amagmatic extension on the large faults contributes to the crustal thinning inferred towards the segment ends.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Sempéré, J.-C., Purdy, G. M. & Schouten, H. Nature 344, 427–431 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin, J., Purdy, G. M., Schouten, H., Sempéré, J.-C. & Zervas, C. Nature 344, 627–632 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sempé, J.-C., Lin, J., Schouten, H. & Purdy, G. M. Mar. geophys Res. (in the press).

  4. Purdy, G. M., Sempéré, J.-C., Schouten, H. DuBois, D. L. & Goldsmith, R. Mar. geophys. Res. 12, 247–252 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Macdonald, K. C. & Luyendyk, B. P. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 88, 621–636 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Macdonald, K. C. & Atwater, T. M. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 39, 319–327 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith, D. K. & Cann, J. R. Nature 348, 152–155 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rona, P. A., Harbison, R. N. & Bush, S. A. Mar. Geol. 16, 275–292 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitmarsh, R. B. & Laughton, A. S. Deep Sea Res. 23, 1005–1023 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kappel, E. S. & Ryan, W. B. F. J. geophys. Res. 91, 13925–13940 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pockalny, R. A., Detrick, R. S. & Fox, P. J. J. geophys. Res. 93, 3179–3193 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kappel, E. S. & Ryan, W. B. F. EOS 72, 467 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kong, L. S. L., Detrick, R. S., Fox, P. J., Mayer, L. A. & Ryan, W. B. F. Mar. geophys. Res. 10, 59–90 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergman, E. A. & Solomon, S. C. J. geophys. Res. 89, 11415–11441 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bratt, S. R., Bergman, E. A. & Solomon, S. C. J. geophys. Res. 90, 10249–10260 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Toomey, D. R., Solomon, S. C., Purdy, G. M. & Murray, M. H. J. geophys. Res. 90, 5443–5458 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Toomey, D. R., Solomon, S. C. & Purdy, G. M. J. geophys. Res. 93, 9093–9112 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, P. Y. & Solomon, S. C. J. geophys. Res. 93, 13445–13477 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bronshtein, I. N. & Semendyayev, K. A. Handbook of Mathematics (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Purdy, G. M. & Detrick, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 91, 3739–3762 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Morris, E. & Detrick, R. S. J. geophys. Res. 96, 4355–4366 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, J. & Bergman, E. A. EOS 71, 1572 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Karson, J. A. et al. Nature 328, 681–685 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dick, H. J. B. EOS 62, 406 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, J. R. & Karson, J. A. Mar. geophys. Res. 10, 109–138 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dick, H. J. B. et al. Proc. Ocean Drill. Progm Sclent. Results 118, 359–398 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, P. Ridge segmentation, faulting and crustal thickness in the Atlantic Ocean. Nature 358, 490–493 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358490a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/358490a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing