Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radiocarbon test of earthquake magnitude at the Cascadia subduction zone

Abstract

THE Cascadia subduction zone, which extends along the northern Pacific coast of North America, might produce earthquakes of magnitude 8 or 9 ('great' earthquakes) even though it has not done so during the past 200 years of European observation1–7. Much of the evidence for past Cascadia earthquakes comes from former meadows and forests that became tidal mudflats owing to abrupt tectonic subsidence in the past 5,000 years2,3,6,7. If due to a great earthquake, such subsidence should have extended along more than 100 km of the coast2. Here we investigate the extent of coastal subsidence that might have been caused by a single earthquake, through high-precision radiocarbon dating of coastal trees that abruptly subsided into the intertidal zone. The ages leave the great-earthquake hypothesis intact by limiting to a few decades the discordance, if any, in the most recent subsidence of two areas 55 km apart along the Washington coast. This subsidence probably occurred about 300 years ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heaton, T. H. & Hartzell, S. H. Science 236, 162–168 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atwater, B. F. Science 236, 942–944 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Darienzo, M. E. & Peterson, C. D. Tectonics 9, 1–22 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams, J. Tectonics 9, 569–583 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Savage, J. C. & Lisowski, M. Science 252, 101–103 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Atwater, B. F. & Yamaguchi, D. K. Geology 19, 706–709 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Atwater, B. F. J. geophys. Res. (in the press).

  8. Plafker, G. J. geophys. Res. 77, 901–925 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando, M. Tectonophysics 27, 119–140 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanamori, H. J. geophys. Res. 82, 2981–2987 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wyss, M. Geology 7, 336–340 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sieh, K., Stuiver, M. & Brillinger, D. J. geophys. Res. 94, 603–623 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott, E. M., Aitchison, T. C., Harkness, D. D., Cook, G. T. & Baxter, M. S. Radiocarbon 32, 309–319 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stuiver, M. & Becker, B. Radiocarbon 28, 863–910 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuiver, M. & Pearson, G. W. Radiocarbon 28, 805–838 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper, J. G. in Reports of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economical Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean, Vol. XII, Book II 36th Congress Exec. Doc. 56 (House of Representatives, 1860).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cowan, D. W. & Potter, C. J. (compilers) Geol. Soc. Am. Continental-Ocean Transect B3 (1986).

  18. Stuiver, M., Burk, R. L. & Quay, P. D. J. geophys. Res. 89, 11731–11748 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Atwater, B., Stuiver, M. & Yamaguchi, D. Radiocarbon test of earthquake magnitude at the Cascadia subduction zone. Nature 353, 156–158 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/353156a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/353156a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing