Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load

Abstract

"THE effects of inbreeding may not be as noticeable in the first generation as the invigoration immediately apparent after crossing"1. This statement, published in 1919, has received little attention, and has apparently never been tested empirically, although the reduction of the genetic load of populations by inbreeding is well known in theoretical terms2–5. Because inbreeding increases homozygosity, and hence the effectiveness of selection against recessive or partially recessive detrimental alleles, changes in levels of inbreeding can lead to a reduction in the frequencies of such mutant alleles. This results in equilibration at higher population mean fitness6 and is referred to as 'purging' populations of their genetic load. Severe inbreeding can also reduce genetic load due to overdominant alleles, provided selection coefficients are not symmetrical at all loci, because alleles giving lower fitness will be reduced in frequency at equilibrium7,8. With either fitness model, however, reduction in genetic load takes time, and the initial effect of an increase in inbreeding is reduced fitness due to homozygosity. There are few data relating to the extent to which fitness is reduced during inbreeding in a set of lines and to how long the reduction lasts before increasing again to the initial level, or higher. Inbreeding experiments involving sib mating in mice and Drosophila subobscura10, and successive bottlenecks in house flies11 have yielded some evidence consistent with the purging hypothesis. Here, we report results of an experiment demonstrating a prolonged time-course of recovery of mean fitness under self-fertilization of a naturally outcrossing plant, and also compare our results with expectations derived by computer calculations. Our results show that the genetic load present in an outcrossing population can be explained only with a high mutation rate to partially recessive deleterious alleles, and that inbreeding purges the population of mutant alleles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. East, E. M. & Jones, D. F. Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Their Genetic and Sociological Significance 147 (Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1919).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Crow, J. F. Genetics 33, 477–487 (1948).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol. 3 (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. Evolution 39, 24–40 (1985).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, B. Evolution 44, 1469–1489 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crow, J. F. in Mathematical Models in Population Genetics (eds Kojima, K.-I.) 128–177 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1970).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 18, 237–268 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziehe, M. & Roberds, J. H. Genetics 121, 861–868 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconer, D. S. Genet. Res. Camb. 17, 215–235 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hollingsworth, M. J. & Maynard-Smith, J. J. Genet. 53, 295–314 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant, E. H., Meffert, L. M. & McCommas, S. A. Amer. Nat. 138, 542–549 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett, S. C. H. & Husband, B. C. Pl. Spec. Biol. 5, 41–55 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Glover, D. E. & Barrett, S. C. H. Heredity 59, 7–17 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. Evolution 44, 870–888 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kondrashov, A. Nature 336, 435–440 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D. & Morgan, M. T. Nature 347, 380–382 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shull, G. H. in Heterosis (ed. Gowen, J. W.) 14–48 (Iowa University Press, Ames, 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Griffin, A. R. & Lindgren, D. Theor. appl. Genet. 71, 334–343 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohta, T. & Cockerham, C. C. Genet. Res. Camb. 23, 191–200 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sing, C. F., Brewer, G. J. & Thirtle, B. Genetics 75, 381–404 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown, A. H. D. Theor. appl. Genet. 15, 1–42 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Templeton, A. R. & Read, B. Zoo Biol. 3, 177–199 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilton, A. N., Joseph, M. G. & Sved, J. Genet. Res. Camb. 54, 129–140 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kondrashov, A. S. Genetics 111, 635–653 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, S., Charlesworth, D. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352, 522–524 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/352522a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/352522a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing