Abstract
CONVENTIONAL optical techniques for detecting companions to stars have been unable to confirm the existence of other planetary systems. This is because of the small angular separation (less than an arcsecond) and relative luminosity (˜10–10 of any planet with respect to its parent star. As the velocity of the star due to the motion of a planet is likely to be only about one metre per second, detection through the Doppler shift of spectral lines in the stellar atmosphere is also impractical. Here we report observations which imply the existence of a planet-sized companion orbiting a neutron star, the pulsar PSR 1829–10, whose motion can be seen by Doppler effects on the observed arrival times of the pulses from the rotating neutron star. The planet is about 10 times the mass of the Earth, and is in an almost circular six-month orbit. It is not clear whether it formed in the aftermath of the supernova that created the neutron star, or was pre-existing and somehow survived through the late phases of stellar evolution and neutron-star formation. In either case, the existence of the planet challenges conventional theories of the formation of neutron stars from supernovae and has important implications for the existence of planetary systems around other stars.
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
220,50 €
only 4,32 € per issue
All prices include VAT for France.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
Clifton, T. R. & Lyne, A. G. Nature 320, 43–45 (1986).
- 2
Clifton, T. R., Lyne, A. G., Jones, A. W., McKenna, J. & Ashworth, M. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (submitted).
- 3
Lyne, A. G. & McKenna, J. Nature 340, 367–369 (1989).
- 4
McKenna, J. & Lyne, A. G. Nature 343, 349–350 (1990).
- 5
Standish, E. M. Astr. Astrophys. 114, 297–302 (1982).
- 6
Manchester, R. N. & Taylor, J. H. Pulsars (Freeman, San Francisco, 1977).
- 7
Pines, D. & Shaham, J. Phys. Earth planet Inter. 6, 103 (1972).
- 8
Nelson, R. W., Finn, L. S. & Wasserman, I. Astrophys. J. 348, 226 (1990).
- 9
Ruderman, M. Nature 225, 619–620 (1970).
- 10
Tkachenko, V. K. Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 1049 (1966).
- 11
Lyne, A. G., Pritchard, R. S. & Smith, F. G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 233, 667–676 (1988).
- 12
Cordes, J. M. & Downs, G. S. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 59, 343–382 (1985).
- 13
Michel, F. C. Astrophys. J. 159, L25–L28 (1970).
- 14
Woosley, S. E. in The Origin and Evolution of Neutron Stars, IAU Symp. 125 (eds Ilelfand, D. J. & Huang, J.) 255 (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).
- 15
Rees, M. J., Trimble, V. L. & Cohen, J. M. Nature 229, 395–396 (1970).
- 16
Blaauw, A. Bull. astr. Inst. Neth. 15, 265–290 (1961).
- 17
Dewey, R. J. & Cordes, J. M. Astrophys. J. 321, 780–798 (1987).
- 18
Bailes, M. Astrophys. J. 342, 917–927 (1989).
- 19
Colgate, S. A. Nature 225, 247 (1970).
- 20
Hills, J. G. Astrophys. J. 267, 322–333 (1983).
- 21
van den Heuvel, E. P. J. & van Paradijs, J. Nature 334, 227–228 (1988).
- 22
Thorne, K. S. & Zytkow, A. N. Astrophys. J. 212, 832 (1977).
Author information
Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Received
Accepted
Issue Date
DOI
Further reading
-
Gravitomagnetic effect in magnetized neutron stars
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (2017)
-
WHY ARE PULSAR PLANETS RARE?
The Astrophysical Journal (2016)
-
Theory of pulsar magnetosphere and wind
Journal of Plasma Physics (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.