Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Better speech recognition with cochlear implants


HIGH levels of speech recognition have been achieved with a new sound processing strategy for multielectrode cochlear implants. A cochlear implant system consists of one or more implanted elec-trodes for direct electrical activation of the auditory nerve, an external speech processor that transforms a microphone input into stimuli for each electrode, and a transcutaneous (rf-link) or per-cutaneous (direct) connection between the processor and the elec-trodes. We report here the comparison of the new strategy and a standard clinical processor. The standard compressed analogue (CA) processor1,2 presented analogue waveforms simultaneously to all electrodes, whereas the new continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) strategy presented brief pulses to each electrode in a nonover-lapping sequence. Seven experienced implant users, selected for their excellent performance with the CA processor, participated as subjects. The new strategy produced large improvements in the scores of speech reception tests for all subjects. These results have important implications for the treatment of deafness and for minimal representations of speech at the auditory periphery.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Eddington, D. K. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 885–891 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eddington, D. K. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 405, 241–258 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pfingst, B. E. Arch. Otolaryngol. 110, 140–144 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shannon, R. V. Hear. Res. 11, 157–189 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C. & Lawson, D. T. in Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear (eds Miller, J. M. & Spelman, F. A.) 339–376 (Springer, New York, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Eddington, D. K., Dobelle, W. H., Brackmann, D. E., Mladejovsky, M. G. & Parkin, J. L. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 87, suppl. 53, 1–39 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Müller, C. G. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 405, 412–420 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Simmons, F. B. Arch. Otolaryngol. 84, 2–54 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tong, Y. C., Blarney, P. J., Dowell, R. C. & Clark, G. M. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 73–80 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. White, M. W., Merzenich, M. M. & Gardi, J. N. Arch. Otolaryngol. 110, 493–501 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, B. S., Finley, C. C., Lawson, D. T. & Wolford, R. D. Proc. I.E.E.E. 76, 1143–1154 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson, B. S., Lawson, D. T., Finley, C. C. & Wolford, R. D. Am. J. Otol. 12, suppl. 1, 56–61 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, G. M. et al. Adv. Otol.-Rhinol. Lar. 38, 1–189 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dorman, M. F., Hannley, M. T., Dankowski, K., Smith, L. & McCandless, G. Ear Hear. 10, 44–49 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gantz, B. J. et al. Laryngoscope 98, 1100–1106 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schindler, R. A. & Kessler, D. K. Am. J. Otol. 8, 247–255 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tyler, R. S., Moore, B. C. J. & Kuk, F. K. J. Speech. Hear. Res. 32, 887–911 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Owens, E., Kessler, D. K., Raggio, M. W. & Schubert, E. D. Ear Hear. 6, 280–287 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De Filippo, C. L. & Scott, B. L. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 1186–1192 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Owens, E. & Raggio, M. J. Speech Hear. Disorders 52, 120–128 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Robbins, A. M., Osberger, M. J., Miyamoto, R. T., Kienle, M. L. & Myres, W. A. J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 565–578 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sparks, D. W., Ardell, L. A., Bourgeois, M., Wiedmer, B. & Kuhl, P. K. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 65, 810–815 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bess, F. H. & Townsend, T. H. J. Speech Hear. Disorders 42, 232–237 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubno, J. R. & Dirks, D. D. J. Speech Hear. Res. 25, 135–141 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dowell, R. C., Seligman, P. M., Blamey, P. J. & Clark, G. M. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Lar. 96, suppl. 128, 132–134 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tyler, R. S., Preece, J. P., Lansing, C. R., Otto, S. R. & Gantz, B. J. J. Speech Hear. Res. 29, 282–287 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flanagan, J. L. Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception (Springer, Berlin, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hill, F. J., McRae, L. P. & McClellan, R. P. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 13–18 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Remez, R. E., Rubin, P. E., Pisoni, D. B. & Carrell, T. D. Science 212, 947–950 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rosen, S. in Cochlear Implant: Acquisitions and Controversies (eds Fraysse, B. & Cochard, N.) 3–26 (Impasse La Caussade, Toulouse, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen, S. M., Fourcin, A. J. & Moore, B. C. J. Nature 291, 150–152 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Tasell, D. J., Soli, S. D., Kirby, V. M. & Widen, G. P. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1152–1161 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, B., Finley, C., Lawson, D. et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352, 236–238 (1991).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing