Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 21 March 2002

Abstract

Social life has costs associated with competition for resources such as food1. Food storing may reduce this competition as the food can be collected quickly and hidden elsewhere2,3,4; however, it is a risky strategy because caches can be pilfered by others5,6,7,8,9. Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘when’ they cached10,11,12,13. Like other corvids6,7,8,9,14, they remember where conspecifics have cached, pilfering them when given the opportunity, but may also adjust their own caching strategies to minimize potential pilfering. To test this, jays were allowed to cache either in private (when the other bird's view was obscured) or while a conspecific was watching, and then recover their caches in private. Here we show that jays with prior experience of pilfering another bird's caches subsequently re-cached food in new cache sites during recovery trials, but only when they had been observed caching. Jays without pilfering experience did not, even though they had observed other jays caching. Our results suggest that jays relate information about their previous experience as a pilferer to the possibility of future stealing by another bird, and modify their caching strategy accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Mean (+ s.e.m.) number of worms re-cached by the three groups.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zentall, T. R. & Galef, B. G. (eds) Social Learning. Psychological and Biological Perspectives (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shettleworth, S. J. in Behavioral Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-naturalistic Settings (eds Alleva, E., Fasolo, A., Lipp, H.-P. & Nadel, L.) 158–179 (Kluwer Academic, The Hague, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vander Wall, S. B. Food Hoarding in Animals (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clarkson, K., Eden, S. F., Sutherland, W. J. & Houston, A. I. Density dependence and magpie food hoarding. J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 111–121 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibb, J. A. Populations of tits and goldcrests and their food supply in pine populations. Ibis 102, 163–208 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bednekoff, P. A. & Balda, R. P. Observational spatial memory in Clark's nutcrackers and Mexican jays. Anim. Behav. 52, 833–839 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heinrich, B. & Pepper, J. W. Influence of competitors on caching behavior in the common raven, Corvus corax. Anim. Behav. 56, 1083–1090 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bugnyar, T. & Kotrschal, K. Do ravens manipulate the others' attention in order to prevent or achieve social learning opportunities? Adv. Ethol. 36. 106 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heinrich, B. Mind of the Raven (Harper Collins, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. D. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395, 272–278 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. D. Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) remember the relative time of caching as well as the location and content of their caches. J. Comp. Psychol. 113, 403–416 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. D. Memory for the contents of caches by Scrub Jays. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 25, 82–91 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clayton, N. S., Yu, K. & Dickinson, A. D. Scrub jays (Aphelocoma coerulescens) can form integrated memory for multiple features of caching episodes. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 27, 17–29 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J. & Dickinson, A. D. Episodic-like memory in animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 1483–1491 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodwin, D. Further observations on the behaviour of the jay. Ibis 98, 186–219 (1956).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens, T. A. & Krebs, J. R. Retrieval of stored seeds by marsh tits (Parus palustris) in the field. Ibis 128, 513–515 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hampton, R. R. & Sherry, D. F. The effects of cache loss on choice of cache sites in the black-capped chickadee. Behav. Ecol. 5, 44–50 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baker, M. C. & Anderson, P. Once-pilfered cache sites not avoided by black-capped chickadees. Anim. Behav. 49, 1599–1602 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hare, B., Call, J., Agnetta, B. & Tomasello, M. Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim. Behav. 59, 771–785 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hare, B., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim. Behav. 61, 139–151 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Whiten, A. & Byrne, R. W. Tactical deception in primates. Behav. Brain Sci. 11, 233–244 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Suddendorf, T. & Corbalis, M. C. Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 123, 133–167 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heyes, C. M. Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 101–148 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. D. Motivational control of caching behaviour in the scrub jay, Aphelocoma coerulescens. Anim. Behav. 57, 435–444 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging and Whitehall foundation grants to N.S.C. N.J.E was funded by a Medical Research Council programme grant to E. B. Keverne. We thank S. Hettige, D. Jennings and V. R. Metcalf for help in running the experiments. We also thank the University of California, Davis, for allowing us to conduct the first trials there and for providing the necessary facilities. We thank S. Baron-Cohen, E. B. Keverne, K. N. Laland, D. I. Perrett and C. J. Saldanha for comments on the manuscript. We are especially grateful to T. J. Bussey, A. Dickinson and N. J. Mackintosh for discussion and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Clayton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emery, N., Clayton, N. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414, 443–446 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35106560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35106560

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing