Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecules, maps and synapse specificity

Nature Reviews Neuroscience volume 2, pages 899–909 (2001)Cite this article

Key Points

  • Synaptogenesis is the culmination of a continuous process, which can be divided into the following stages: (1) axon guidance or pathfinding; (2) gross target recognition; (3) fine target recognition; and (4) elaboration of synaptic contacts onto appropriate cellular domains. Furthermore, synaptic connections are organized topographically, an essential anatomical substrate for orderly 'maps' of sensory surfaces, such as the retina.

  • Sperry proposed that the topographically ordered distribution of synapses was established by “highly specific cytochemical affinities” between an axon and the environment through which it grows, and ultimately its target neuron. He proposed an orderly mapping of two or more standing gradients that are orthogonal to one another, so that an incoming axon is guided by signals encoding both latitude and longitude. Subsequent models have addressed the nature of standing gradients, and how a growth cone might sense and respond to the subtle differences in the molecular environment generated by such gradients.

  • Haydon and Drapeau proposed two general modes of synapse specification. 'Selective' neurons send their neurites only to their appropriate target; 'promiscuous' neurons form synapses with a number of targets, and final specificity is achieved by pruning away the incorrect terminal sites in an activity-mediated process.

  • Neuronal differentiation is the first step in synapse specification. Neurons, and the position they hold within a larger group, impart information. Group identification might be encoded, at least in part, by differential adhesion, and neighbour relationships within groups might be established by gap-junction-mediated communication, or by regulated patterns of calcium waves.

  • The final topographic order of axons within a target might reflect an ordered distribution of axons within a fibre tract. However, retinal axon ordering alone does not seem to be sufficient for dorsoventral patterning in the optic tectum.

  • In the dorsal thalamus, collections of neurons born contemporaneously parse into distinct nuclei. It is remarkable that targeting is precise from the earliest stages of innervation, because thalamic axons from different nuclei travel together through a similar environment, and are presented with an array of possible areal targets.

  • Presynaptic assembly cannot be entirely nonspecific, or all potential partners brought into close proximity would form synapses with each other. Evidence indicates that a particular recognition threshold must be passed in order for synapse-initiation molecules to link. In vitro studies indicate that an interaction between β-neurexin and neuroligins can trigger synapse initiation. Several other molecules have been suggested to be involved in the early stages of synapse recognition/initiation, including EphB and Narp.

  • Stabilizing a synapse is likely to require various molecules, but activity seems to be essential; strong evidence indicates that neurotrophins are involved, and recent work indicates that local synthesis of synaptic proteins might also be important. In Drosophila, homophilic binding between pre- and postsynaptically localized Fasciclin II is required to maintain a neuromuscular synapse, and members of the cadherin superfamily might have a similar role in vertebrates.

  • Synaptogenesis should be viewed as an ongoing process that includes the modification and elimination of existing synapses and the generation of new synapses. Consistent with this, several guidance and recognition molecules continue to be expressed in adult nervous systems, and many have been implicated in the generation of synapse plasticity.

Abstract

A striking feature of the mature central nervous system is the precision of the synaptic circuitry. In contemplating the mature circuitry, it is impossible to imagine how more than 20 billion neurons in the human brain become precisely connected through trillions of synapses. Remarkably, much of the final wiring can be established in the absence of neural activity or experience; so the algorithms that allow precise connectivity must be encoded largely by the genetic programme. This programme, honed over nearly one billion years of evolution, generates networks with the flexibility to respond to a wide range of physiological challenges. There are several contemporary models of how synapse specificity is achieved, many of them proposed before the identification of guidance or recognition molecules. Here we review a selection of models as frameworks for defining the nature and complexity of synaptogenesis, and evaluate their validity in view of progress made in identifying the molecular underpinnings of axon guidance, targeting and synapse formation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The process of targeting a synapse.
Figure 2: Models for achieving synapse specificity.
Figure 3: Contact-mediated recognition proteins and their binding partners.
Figure 4: Synapse between 6-day-old cultured hippocampal neurons.
Figure 5: A simple model of afferent-dependent cadherin clustering.

References

  1. Holt, C. E. & Harris, W. A. Target selection: invasion, mapping and cell choice. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 98–105 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sperry, R. W. Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 50, 703–710 (1963).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Langley, J. N. Note on the regeneration of preganglionic fibres of the sympathetic. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 18, 280–284 (1895).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraser, S. E. & Hunt, R. K. Retinotectal plasticity in Xenopus: anomalous ipsilateral projection following late larval eye removal. Dev. Biol. 79, 444–452 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gierer, A. Model for the retino-tectal projection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 218, 77–93 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Loschinger, J., Weth, F. & Bonhoeffer, F. Reading of concentration gradients by axonal growth cones. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 355, 971–982 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Eccles, J. C., Llinas, R. & Sasaki, K. The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 182, 268–296 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaze, R. M., Keating, M. J., Ostberg, A. & Chung, S. H. The relationship between retinal and tectal growth in larval Xenopus: implications for the development of the retino-tectal projection. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 53, 103–143 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altman, J. & Anderson, W. J. Experimental reorganization of the cerebellar cortex. I. Morphological effects of elimination of all microneurons with prolonged X-irradiation started at birth. J. Comp. Neurol. 146, 355–406 (1972).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordon, T., Perry, R., Tuffery, A. R. & Vrbova, G. Possible mechanisms determining synapse formation in developing skeletal muscles of the chick. Cell Tissue Res. 155, 13–25 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nja, A. & Purves, D. The effects of nerve growth factor and its antiserum on synapses in the superior cervical ganglion of the guinea-pig. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 277, 55–75 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Changeux, J. P. & Danchin, A. Selective stabilisation of developing synapses as a mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks. Nature 264, 705–712 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burry, R. W., Kniss, D. A. & Scribner, L. R. in Current Topics in Research on Synapses (ed. Jones, D. G.) 1–51 (Alan R. Liss, Columbus, Ohio, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vaughn, J. E. Fine structure of synaptogenesis in the vertebrate central nervous system. Synapse 3, 255–285 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Feldheim, D. A. et al. Genetic analysis of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 shows their requirement in multiple aspects of retinocollicular mapping. Neuron 25, 563–574 (2000).Unequivocally demonstrates the link between ephrins and the establishment of topography in the retinal–collicular projection.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maier, D. L. et al. Disrupted cortical map and absence of cortical barrels in growth-associated protein (GAP)-43 knockout mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9397–9402 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fricke, C., Lee, J. S., Geiger-Rudolph, S., Bonhoeffer, F. & Chien, C. B. astray, a zebrafish roundabout homolog required for retinal axon guidance. Science 292, 507–510 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulfone, A. et al. An olfactory sensory map develops in the absence of normal projection neurons or GABAergic interneurons. Neuron 21, 1273–1282 (1998).By examining mice deficient in either Tbr1, which results in the loss of most mitral and tufted cells, or Dlx1/Dlx2, which results in the loss of most GABA-producing interneurons, this study shows that topographically correct olfactory projections can be established in the absence of synaptic partners.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraser, S. E. & Perkel, D. H. Competitive and positional cues in the patterning of nerve connections. J. Neurobiol. 21, 51–72 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haydon, P. G. & Drapeau, P. From contact to connection: early events during synaptogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 18, 196–201 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zoran, M. J., Doyle, R. T. & Haydon, P. G. Target-dependent induction of secretory capabilities in an identified motoneuron during synaptogenesis. Dev. Biol. 138, 202–213 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanfield, B. B., O'Leary, D. D. & Fricks, C. Selective collateral elimination in early postnatal development restricts cortical distribution of rat pyramidal tract neurones. Nature 298, 371–373 (1982).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tessier-Lavigne, M. & Goodman, C. S. The molecular biology of axon guidance. Science 274, 1123–1133 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoeckli, E. T. & Landmesser, L. T. Axon guidance at choice points. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 73–79 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Long, K. E. & Lemmon, V. Dynamic regulation of cell adhesion molecules during axon outgrowth. J. Neurobiol. 44, 230–245 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Korey, C. A. & Van Vactor, D. From the growth cone surface to the cytoskeleton: one journey, many paths. J. Neurobiol. 44, 184–193 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lanier, L. M. & Gertler, F. B. From Abl to actin: Abl tyrosine kinase and associated proteins in growth cone motility. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 80–87 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Suter, D. M. & Forscher, P. Substrate–cytoskeletal coupling as a mechanism for the regulation of growth cone motility and guidance. J. Neurobiol. 44, 97–113 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Katz, L. C. & Shatz, C. J. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274, 1133–1138 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gotz, M., Wizenmann, A., Reinhardt, S., Lumsden, A. & Price, J. Selective adhesion of cells from different telencephalic regions. Neuron 16, 551–564 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wizenmann, A. & Lumsden, A. Segregation of rhombomeres by differential chemoaffinity. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 448–459 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Whitesides, J. G. 3rd & LaMantia, A. S. Distinct adhesive behaviors of neurons and neural precursor cells during regional differentiation in the mammalian forebrain. Dev. Biol. 169, 229–241 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takeichi, M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science 25, 1451–1455 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Redies, C. & Takeichi, M. Cadherins in the developing central nervous system: an adhesive code for segmental and functional subdivisions. Dev. Biol. 180, 413–423 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anton, E. S., Kreidberg, J. A. & Rakic, P. Distinct functions of α3 and αv integrin receptors in neuronal migration and laminar organization of the cerebral cortex. Neuron 22, 277–289 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Graus-Porta, D. et al. β1-class integrins regulate the development of laminae and folia in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Neuron 31, 367–379 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mellitzer, G., Xu, Q. & Wilkinson, D. G. Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication. Nature 400, 77–81 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lo Turco, J. J. & Kriegstein, A. R. Clusters of coupled neuroblasts in embryonic neocortex. Science 252, 563–566 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuste, R., Peinado, A. & Katz, L. C. Neuronal domains in developing neocortex. Science 257, 665–669 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Meister, M., Wong, R. O., Baylor, D. A. & Shatz, C. J. Synchronous bursts of action potentials in ganglion cells of the developing mammalian retina. Science 252, 939–943 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong, R. O., Chernjavsky, A., Smith, S. J. & Shatz, C. J. Early functional neural networks in the developing retina. Nature 374, 716–718 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Constantine-Paton, M., Cline, H. T. & Debski, E. Patterned activity, synaptic convergence and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 129–154 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schulte, D., Furukawa, T., Peters, M. A., Kozak, C. A. & Cepko, C. L. Misexpression of the Emx-related homeobox genes cVax and mVax2 ventralizes the retina and perturbs the retinotectal map. Neuron 24, 541–553 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Koshiba-Takeuchi, K. et al. Tbx5 and the retinotectum projection. Science 287, 134–137 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sakuta, H. et al. Ventroptin: a BMP-4 antagonist expressed in a double-gradient pattern in the retina. Science 293, 111–115 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Agmon, A., Yang, L. T., O'Dowd, D. K. & Jones, E. G. Organized growth of thalamocortical axons from the deep tier of terminations into layer IV of developing mouse barrel cortex. J. Neurosci. 13, 5365–5382 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Molnar, Z., Adams, R. & Blakemore, C. Mechanisms underlying the early establishment of thalamocortical connections in the rat. J. Neurosci. 18, 5723–5745 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Reese, B. E. & Baker, G. E. The re-establishment of the representation of the dorso-ventral retinal axis in the chiasmatic region of the ferret. Vis. Neurosci. 10, 957–968 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chan, S. O. & Guillery, R. W. Changes in fiber order in the optic nerve and tract of rat embryos. J. Comp. Neurol. 344, 20–32 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chung, S. H. & Cooke, J. Observations on the formation of the brain and of nerve connections following embryonic manipulation of the amphibian neural tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 201, 335–373 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Milner, L. D., Rafuse, V. F. & Landmesser, L. T. Selective fasciculation and divergent pathfinding decisions of embryonic chick motor axons projecting to fast and slow muscle regions. J. Neurosci. 18, 3297–3313 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Lemmon, V. & McLoon, S. The appearance of an L1-like molecule in the chick primary visual pathway. J. Neurosci. 6, 2987–2994 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Lin, D. M., Fetter, R. D., Kopczynski, C., Grenningloh, G. & Goodman, C. S. Genetic analysis of Fasciclin II in Drosophila: defasciculation, refasciculation, and altered fasciculation. Neuron 13, 1055–1069 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Berglund, E. O. et al. Ataxia and abnormal cerebellar microorganization in mice with ablated contactin gene expression. Neuron 24, 739–750 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yin, X., Watanabe, M. & Rutishauser, U. Effect of polysialic acid on the behavior of retinal ganglion cell axons during growth into the optic tract and tectum. Development 121, 3439–3446 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Xiao, Z. C. et al. Defasciculation of neurites is mediated by tenascin-R and its neuronal receptor F3/11. J. Neurosci. Res. 52, 390–404 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Yu, H. H., Huang, A. S. & Kolodkin, A. L. Semaphorin-1a acts in concert with the cell adhesion molecules Fasciclin II and Connectin to regulate axon fasciculation in Drosophila. Genetics 156, 723–731 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Stoeckli, E. T. & Landmesser, L. T. Axonin-1, Nr-CAM, and Ng-CAM play different roles in the in vivo guidance of chick commissural neurons. Neuron 14, 1165–1179 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ragsdale, C. W. & Grove, E. A. Patterning the mammalian cerebral cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 50–58 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Miyashita-Lin, E. M., Hevner, R., Wassarman, K. M., Martinez, S. & Rubenstein, J. L. Early neocortical regionalization in the absence of thalamic innervation. Science 285, 906–909 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bishop, K. M., Goudreau, G. & O' Leary, D. D. Regulation of area identity in the mammalian neocortex by Emx2 and Pax6. Science 288, 344–349 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mallamaci, A., Muzio, L., Chan, C. H., Parnavelas, J. & Boncinelli, E. Area identity shifts in the early cerebral cortex of Emx2−/− mutant mice. Nature Neurosci. 3, 679–686 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhou, C., Tsai, S. Y. & Tsai, M. J. COUP-TFI: an intrinsic factor for early regionalization of the neocortex. Genes Dev. 15, 2054–2059 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Fukuchi-Shimogori, T. & Grove, E. A. Patterning of the neocortex by the secreted signaling molecule FGF8. Science published online 20 September 2001 (10.1126/science.1064252).This study shows that the anteroposterior positioning of areal boundaries in mammalian neocortex can be regulated by a diffusible signalling molecule, FGF8, secreted from a 'signal centre' in the anterior telencephalon.

  65. Pimenta, A. F., Fischer, I. & Levitt, I. cDNA cloning and structural analysis of the human limbic-system-associated membrane protein (LAMP). Gene 170, 189–195 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chédotal, A. et al. Semaphorins III and IV repel hippocampal axons via two distinct receptors. Development 125, 4313–4323 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Donoghue, M. J. & Rakic, P. Molecular evidence for the early specification of presumptive functional domains in the embryonic primate cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 19, 5967–5979 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Molnar, Z. & Blakemore, C. Lack of regional specificity for connections formed between thalamus and cortex in coculture. Nature 351, 475–477 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Schlaggar, B. L. & O'Leary, D. D. Potential of visual cortex to develop an array of functional units unique to somatosensory cortex. Science 252, 1556–1560 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Huffman, K. J. et al. Formation of cortical fields on a reduced cortical sheet. J. Neurosci. 19, 9939–9952 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Gaze, R. M. & Sharma, S. C. Axial differences in the reinnervation of the goldfish optic tectum by regenerating optic nerve fibres. Exp. Brain Res. 10, 171–181 (1970).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. White, E. L. Cortical Circuits: Synaptic Organization of the Cerebral Cortex — Structure, Function, and Theory (Birkhäuser, Boston, Massachusetts, 1989).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  73. Inoue, A. & Sanes, J. R. Lamina-specific connectivity in the brain: regulation by N-cadherin, neurotrophins, and glycoconjugates. Science 276, 1428–1431 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Huntley, G. W. & Benson, D. L. N-Cadherin at developing thalamocortical synapses provides an adhesion mechanism for the formation of somatotopically organized connections. J. Comp. Neurol. 407, 453–471 (1999).The selectivity and timing of N-cadherin localization indicates an important role in thalamic axon targeting and synapse formation as topographic maps are established.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Lee, C. H., Herman, T., Clandinin, T. R., Lee, R. & Zipursky, S. L. N-cadherin regulates target specificity in the Drosophila visual system. Neuron 30, 437–450 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Clandinin, T. R. et al. Drosophila LAR regulates R1–R6 and R7 target specificity in the visual system. Neuron 32, 237–248 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Perrin, F. E., Rathjen, F. G. & Stoeckli, E. T. Distinct subpopulations of sensory afferents require F11 or axonin-1 for growth to their target layers within the spinal cord of the chick. Neuron 30, 707–723 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kose, H., Rose, D., Zhu, X. & Chiba, A. Homophilic synaptic target recognition mediated by immunoglobulin-like cell adhesion molecule Fasciclin III. Development 124, 4143–4152 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Winberg, M. L., Mitchell, K. J. & Goodman, C. S. Genetic analysis of the mechanisms controlling target selection: complementary and combinatorial functions of netrins, semaphorins, and IgCAMs. Cell 93, 581–591 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rabacchi, S. A. et al. Collapsin-1/semaphorin-III/D is regulated developmentally in Purkinje cells and collapses pontocerebellar mossy fiber neuronal growth cones. J. Neurosci. 19, 4437–4448 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Yamagata, M., Herman, J. P. & Sanes, J. R. Lamina-specific expression of adhesion molecules in developing chick optic tectum. J. Neurosci. 15, 4556–4571 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Seki, T. & Rutishauser, U. Removal of polysialic acid-neural cell adhesion molecule induces aberrant mossy fiber innervation and ectopic synaptogenesis in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 18, 3757–3766 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Kawakami, A., Kitsukawa, T., Takagi, S. & Fujisawa, H. Developmentally regulated expression of a cell surface protein, neuropilin, in the mouse nervous system. J. Neurobiol. 29, 1–17 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Stein, E. et al. A role for the Eph ligand ephrin-A3 in entorhino–hippocampal axon targeting. J. Neurosci. 19, 8885–8893 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Super, H., Martinez, A., Del Rio, J. A. & Soriano, E. Involvement of distinct pioneer neurons in the formation of layer-specific connections in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 18, 4616–4626 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Gan, W. B. & Macagno, E. R. Developing neurons use a putative pioneer's peripheral arbor to establish their terminal fields. J. Neurosci. 15, 3254–3262 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. DeFelipe, J. & Fariñas, I. The pyramidal neuron of the cerebral cortex: morphological and chemical characteristics of the synaptic inputs. Prog. Neurobiol. 39, 563–607 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Somogyi, P. et al. Identified axo–axonic cells are immunoreactive for GABA in the hippocampus and visual cortex of the cat. Brain Res. 332, 143–149 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Benson, D. L. & Cohen, P. A. Activity-independent segregation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic terminals in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 16, 6424–6432 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Winckler, B., Forscher, P. & Mellman, I. A diffusion barrier maintains distribution of membrane proteins in polarized neurons. Nature 397, 698–701 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Davis, J. Q., Lambert, S. & Bennett, V. Molecular composition of the node of Ranvier: identification of ankyrin-binding cell adhesion molecules neurofascin (mucin+/third FNIII domain−) and NrCAM at nodal axon segments. J. Cell Biol. 135, 1355–1367 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Jacobson, M. Development of specific neuronal connections. Science 163, 543–547 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tamamaki, N. Development of afferent fiber lamination in the infrapyramidal blade of the rat dentate gyrus. J. Comp. Neurol. 411, 257–266 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Laurberg, S. & Hjorth-Simonsen, A. Growing central axons deprived of normal target neurones by neonatal X-ray irradiation still terminate in a precisely laminated fashion. Nature 269, 158–160 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Flanagan, J. G. & Vanderhaeghen, P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 309–345 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Brown, A. et al. Topographic mapping from the retina to the midbrain is controlled by relative but not absolute levels of EphA receptor signaling. Cell 102, 77–88 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Vanderhaeghen, P. et al. A mapping label required for normal scale of body representation in the cortex. Nature Neurosci. 3, 358–365 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Sestan, N., Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. & Rakic, P. Contact-dependent inhibition of cortical neurite growth mediated by Notch signaling. Science 286, 741–746 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. O'Leary, D. D., Yates, P. A. & McLaughlin, T. Molecular development of sensory maps: representing sights and smells in the brain. Cell 96, 255–269 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Bruckner, K. & Klein, R. Signaling by Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 8, 375–382 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Torres, R. et al. PDZ proteins bind, cluster, and synaptically colocalize with Eph receptors and their ephrin ligands. Neuron 21, 1453–1463 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Nakamoto, M. & Bergemann, A. D. Diverse roles for the Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases in carcinogenesis Microsc. Res. Tech. (in the press).

  103. Monschau, B. et al. Shared and distinct functions of RAGS and ELF-1 in guiding retinal axons. EMBO J. 16, 1258–1267 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Craig, A. M. & Boudin, H. Molecular heterogeneity of central synapses: afferent and target regulation. Nature Neurosci. 4, 569–578 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Shapiro, L. & Colman, D. R. The diversity of cadherins and implications for a synaptic adhesive code in the CNS. Neuron 23, 427–430 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Fletcher, T. L., De Camilli, P. & Banker, G. Synaptogenesis in hippocampal cultures: evidence indicating that axons and dendrites become competent to form synapses at different stages of neuronal development. J. Neurosci. 14, 6695–6706 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Super, H. & Soriano, E. The organization of the embryonic and early postnatal murine hippocampus. II. Development of entorhinal, commissural, and septal connections studied with the lipophilic tracer DiI. J. Comp. Neurol. 344, 101–120 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Withers, G. S., Higgins, D., Charette, M. & Banker, G. Bone morphogenetic protein-7 enhances dendritic growth and receptivity to innervation in cultured hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 106–116 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. McAllister, A. K., Katz, L. C. & Lo, D. C. Neurotrophin regulation of cortical dendritic growth requires activity. Neuron 17, 1057–1064 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ziv, N. E. & Smith, S. J. Evidence for a role of dendritic filopodia in synaptogenesis and spine formation. Neuron 17, 91–102 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Fiala, J. C., Feinberg, M., Popov, V. & Harris, K. M. Synaptogenesis via dendritic filopodia in developing hippocampal area CA1. J. Neurosci. 18, 8900–8911 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Scheiffele, P., Fan, J., Choih, J., Fetter, R. & Serafini, T. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell 101, 657–669 (2000).The identification of putative molecular interactions that trigger the formation of presynaptic terminals.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Butz, S., Okamoto, M. & Sudhof, T. C. A tripartite protein complex with the potential to couple synaptic vesicle exocytosis to cell adhesion in brain. Cell 94, 773–782 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Ullrich, B., Ushkaryov, Y. A. & Sudhof, T. C. Cartography of neurexins: more than 1000 isoforms generated by alternative splicing and expressed in distinct subsets of neurons. Neuron 14, 497–507 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Brose, N. Synaptic cell adhesion proteins and synaptogenesis in the mammalian central nervous system. Naturwissenschaften 86, 516–524 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Burry, R. W. Formation of apparent presynaptic elements in response to poly-basic compounds. Brain Res. 184, 85–98 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Zhai, R. G. et al. Assembling the presynaptic active zone: a characterization of an active one precursor vesicle. Neuron 29, 131–143 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Phillips, G. R. et al. The presynaptic particle web: ultrastructure, composition, dissolution, and reconstitution. Neuron 32, 63–77 (2001).Reports the purification of the 'presynaptic grid' from CNS synapses, which can be solubilized and reconstituted as 50-nm particles.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Fletcher, T. L., Cameron, P., De Camilli, P. & Banker, G. The distribution of synapsin I and synaptophysin in hippocampal neurons developing in culture. J. Neurosci. 11, 1617–1626 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Dalva, M. B. et al. EphB receptors interact with NMDA receptors and regulate excitatory synapse formation. Cell 103, 945–956 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. O'Brien, R. J. et al. Synaptic clustering of AMPA receptors by the extracellular immediate-early gene product Narp. Neuron 23, 309–323 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Roe, A. W., Pallas, S. L., Hahm, J. O. & Sur, M. A map of visual space induced in primary auditory cortex. Science 250, 818–820 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Scalia, F. et al. A compartment-based, asymmetric representation of the retina in an induced projection to the olfactory cortex. J. Comp. Neurol. 383, 415–427 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Mason, C. A., Christakos, S. & Catalano, S. M. Early climbing fiber interactions with Purkinje cells in the postnatal mouse cerebellum. J. Comp. Neurol. 297, 77–90 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Sanes, J. R. & Lichtman, J. W. Development of the vertebrate neuromuscular junction. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 389–442 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Wang, X. H., Zheng, J. Q. & Poo, M. M. Effects of cytochalasin treatment on short-term synaptic plasticity at developing neuromuscular junctions in frogs. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 491, 187–195 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Bernstein, B. W., DeWit, M. & Bamburg, J. R. Actin disassembles reversibly during electrically induced recycling of synaptic vesicles in cultured neurons. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 53, 236–251 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Zhang, W. & Benson, D. L. Stages of synapse development defined by dependence on F-actin. J. Neurosci. 21, 5169–5181 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  129. Verhage, M. et al. Synaptic assembly of the brain in the absence of neurotransmitter secretion. Science 287, 864–869 (2000).By deleting a molecule required for synaptic vesicle fusion, this work shows that activity is not essential for many general aspects of neural development, including the formation of morphological synapses, but is required for the maintenance of connectivity.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Wang, T., Xie, K. & Lu, B. Neurotrophins promote maturation of developing neuromuscular synapses. J. Neurosci. 15, 4796–4805 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Causing, C. G. et al. Synaptic innervation density is regulated by neuron-derived BDNF. Neuron 18, 257–267 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Martinez, A. et al. TrkB and TrkC signaling are required for maturation and synaptogenesis of hippocampal connections. J. Neurosci. 18, 7336–7350 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Schacher, S., Wu, F., Panyko, J. D., Sun, Z. Y. & Wang, D. Expression and branch-specific export of mRNA are regulated by synapse formation and interaction with specific postsynaptic targets. J. Neurosci. 19, 6338–6347 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Schuster, C. M., Davis, G. W., Fetter, R. D. & Goodman, C. S. Genetic dissection of structural and functional components of synaptic plasticity. I. Fasciclin II controls synaptic stabilization and growth. Neuron 17, 641–654 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Davis, G. W., Schuster, C. M. & Goodman, C. S. Genetic analysis of the mechanisms controlling target selection: target-derived Fasciclin II regulates the pattern of synapse formation. Neuron 19, 561–573 (1997).Shows that relative levels of expression are as important as the molecule expressed when specifying a synapse.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Wu, Q. & Maniatis, T. A striking organization of a large family of human neural cadherin-like cell adhesion genes. Cell 97, 779–790 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Kohmura, N. et al. Neuronal receptor diversity expressed by a novel family of cadherin-related neuronal receptor genes in postsynaptic densities. Neuron 20, 1137–1151 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Arndt, K., Nakagawa, S., Takeichi, M. & Redies, C. Cadherin-defined segments and parasagittal cell ribbons in the developing chicken cerebellum. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 211–228 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Suzuki, S. C., Inoue, T., Kimura, Y., Tanaka, T. & Takeichi, M. Neuronal circuits are subdivided by differential expression of type-II classic cadherins in postnatal mouse brains. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 433–447 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Miskevich, F., Zhu, Y., Ranscht, B. & Sanes, J. R. Expression of multiple cadherins and catenins in the chick optic tectum. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 12, 240–255 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Benson, D. L. & Tanaka, H. N-cadherin redistribution during synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 18, 6892–6904 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Fannon, A. M. & Colman, D. R. A model for central synaptic junctional complex formation based on the differential adhesive specificities of the cadherins. Neuron 17, 423–434 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Asakura, T. et al. Similar and differential behaviour between the nectin–afadin–ponsin and cadherin–catenin systems during the formation and disruption of the polarized junctional alignment in epithelial cells. Genes Cells 4, 573–581 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Adams, C. L., Chen, Y. T., Smith, S. J. & Nelson, W. J. Mechanisms of epithelial cell–cell adhesion and cell compaction revealed by high-resolution tracking of E-cadherin–green fluorescent protein. J. Cell. Biol. 142, 1105–1119 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Uchida, N., Honjo, Y., Johnson, K. R., Wheelock, M. J. & Takeichi, M. The catenin/cadherin adhesion system is localized in synaptic junctions bordering transmitter release zones. J. Cell Biol. 135, 767–779 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Nusser, Z., Sieghart, W., Benke, D., Fritschy, J. M. & Somogyi, P. Differential synaptic localization of two major γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor α subunits on hippocampal pyramidal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11939–11944 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Siegel, S. J. et al. Regional, cellular, and ultrastructural distribution of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor subunit 1 in monkey hippocampus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 564–568 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. Rao, A., Kim, E., Sheng, M. & Craig, A. M. Heterogeneity in the molecular composition of excitatory postsynaptic sites during development of hippocampal neurons in culture. J. Neurosci. 18, 1217–1229 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  149. Friedman, H. V., Bresler, T., Garner, C. C. & Ziv, N. E. Assembly of new individual excitatory synapses: time course and temporal order of synaptic molecule recruitment. Neuron 27, 57–69 (2000).The first study to follow the real-time assembly of a synapse.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Wu, G.-Y., Malinow, R. & Cline, H. T. Maturation of a central glutamatergic synapse. Science 274, 972–976 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Petralia, R. S. et al. Selective acquisition of AMPA receptors over postnatal development suggests a molecular basis for silent synapses. Nature Neurosci. 2, 31–36 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Chavis, P. & Westbrook, G. Integrins mediate functional pre- and postsynaptic maturation at a hippocampal synapse. Nature 411, 317–321 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Crair, M. C. & Malenka, R. C. A critical period for long-term potentiation at thalamocortical synapses. Nature 375, 325–328 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Wells, J. E., Porter, J. T. & Agmon, A. GABAergic inhibition suppresses paroxysmal network activity in the neonatal rodent hippocampus and neocortex. J. Neurosci. 20, 8822–8830 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Zwimpfer, T. J., Aguayo, A. J. & Bray, G. M. Synapse formation and preferential distribution in the granule cell layer by regenerating retinal ganglion cell axons guided to the cerebellum of adult hamsters. J. Neurosci. 12, 1144–1159 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Toni, N., Buchs, P. A., Nikonenko, I., Bron, C. R. & Muller, D. LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite. Nature 402, 421–425 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Bozdagi, O., Shan, W., Tanaka, H., Benson, D. L. & Huntley, G. W. Increasing numbers of synaptic puncta during late-phase LTP: N-cadherin is synthesized, recruited to synaptic sites and required for potentiation. Neuron 28, 245–259 (2000).N-cadherin is synthesized and targeted to newly forming synapses in conjunction with protein-synthesis-dependent hippocampal late-phase long-term potentiation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Schachner, M. Neural recognition molecules and synaptic plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 627–634 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Gerlai, R. Eph receptors and neural plasticity. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2, 205–209 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Martin, K. C. & Kandel, E. R. Cell adhesion molecules, CREB, and the formation of new synaptic connections. Neuron 17, 567–570 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Benson, D. L., Schnapp, L. M., Shapiro, L. & Huntley, G. W. Making memories stick: cell adhesion molecules in synaptic plasticity. Trends Cell Biol. 10, 473–482 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work is generously supported by the Corrinne Goldsmith Dickinson Center for Multiple Sclerosis; the Bachmann-Strauss Dystonia and Parkinson Foundation, Inc.; the Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation; Irma T Hirschl Career Scientist Awards; a New York State Department of Health Spinal Cord Injury Trust Award; and by National Institutes of Health US Public Health Service awards to D.L.B., D.R.C. and G.W.H. We thank A. Bergemann for his comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fishberg Research Center for Neurobiology, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, 10029, USA

    Deanna L. Benson & George W. Huntley

  2. Departments of Neurology and Biochemistry, The Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, 10029, USA

    David R. Colman

Authors
  1. Deanna L. Benson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Colman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George W. Huntley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanna L. Benson.

Related links

Related links

DATABASES

FlyBase

Fasciclin II

Fasciclin III

Lar

N-cadherin

Netrin

Semaphorin II

GenBank

axonin-1

BMP4

F11

N-cadherin

β-neurexin

NgCAM

NrCAM

Tbx5

Vax

ventroptin

LocusLink

BMP7

cadherin

EphA

EphB

ephrin

FGF8

integrin

L1

LAMP

Narp

N-cadherin

α-N-catenin

neurofascin

neuroligin 1

neuroligin 2

neuropilin 1

neuropilin 2

NrCAM

protocadherin

semaphorin III

Glossary

INTERNAL CAPSULE

A large bundle of axons that reciprocally connects the cortex with the subcortical structures of the brain.

SPLIT BRAIN

A brain in which the two hemispheres have been separated by severing the commissures that connect them. Sperry carried out his original experiments on a patient whose corpus callosum had been cut to treat epilepsy. This work showed that both halves of the brain can function independently, and that the brain is functionally asymmetrical.

MULTIPLE CONSTRAINTS MODEL

Any model in which multiple rules or variables operate in concert.

HELISOMA

A freshwater pond snail with a brown shell in the shape of a flattened spiral.

HOMOPHILIC BINDING

Adhesion that is mediated through attraction between identical molecules expressed by different cells.

RHOMBOMERES

Neuroepithelial segments found transiently in the embryonic hindbrain that adopt distinct molecular and cellular properties, restrictions in cell mixing, and ordered domains of gene expression.

BARRELS

Cylindrical columns of neurons seen in the rodent neocortex. Each barrel receives sensory input from a single whisker follicle, and the topographical organization of the barrels corresponds precisely to the arrangement of whisker follicles on the face.

GPI

Glycosyl phosphatidylinositol. A post-translational modification, the function of which is to attach proteins to the exoplasmic leaflet of membranes, possibly to specific domains therein. The anchor is made of one molecule of phosphatidylinositol to which a carbohydrate chain is linked through the C-6 hydroxyl of the inositol, and is attached to the protein through an ethanolamine phosphate moiety.

RECEPTOR TYROSINE PHOSPHATASES

Also known as receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs), these are transmembrane signal transduction proteins that modulate the levels of tyrosine phosphorylation in the cell. Their intracellular domains catalyse the dephosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues on their target proteins. Signalling through RPTPs is thought to be important for various developmental processes, including axon growth and guidance.

PROPRIOCEPTIVE

Relating to the perception of position and movement of the body parts, in response to stimuli generated within the body.

CHANDELIER CELL

A type of cortical GABA-expressing inhibitory interneuron. One of its distinguishing features is that its axon terminates on the axon initial segment of its target cell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benson, D., Colman, D. & Huntley, G. Molecules, maps and synapse specificity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 899–909 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35104078

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35104078

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing