Roughly 20% of the European Union's farmland is under some form of agri-environment scheme to counteract the negative impacts of modern agriculture on the environment1. The associated costs represent about 4% (1.7 billion euros) of the European Union's total expenditure on the Common Agricultural Policy and are expected to rise to 10% in the near future2. Although agri-environment schemes have been implemented in various countries for well over a decade, to date no reliable, sufficiently replicated studies have been performed to test whether such measures have the presumed positive effects on biodiversity1,3,4. Here we present the results of a study evaluating the contribution of agri-environment schemes to the protection of biodiversity in intensively used Dutch agricultural landscapes. We surveyed plants, birds, hover flies and bees on 78 paired fields that either had agri-environment schemes in the form of management agreements or were managed conventionally. Management agreements were not effective in protecting the species richness of the investigated species groups: no positive effects on plant and bird species diversity were found. The four most common wader species were observed even less frequently on fields with management agreements. By contrast, hover flies and bees showed modest increases in species richness on fields with management agreements. Our results indicate that there is a pressing need for a scientifically sound evaluation of agri-environment schemes.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Working Document ‘State of Application of Regulation (EEC) no. 2078/92. Evaluation of Agri–Environment Programmes’, VI/7655/98, 9.11.1998 (01 June 01) 〈http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/envir/programs/evalrep/text_en.pdf〉 (1998).
European Community. For a stronger and wider EU. Agenda 2000, Vol. 1. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1997).
Donald, P. F., Green, R. E. & Heath, M. F. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 268, 25–29 (2001).
Krebs, J. R., Wilson, J. D., Bradbury, R. B. & Siriwardena, G. M. The second silent spring? Nature 400, 611–612 (1999).
Beintema, A. J., Dunn, E. & Stroud, D. A. in Farming and Birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation (eds Pain, D. J. & Pienkowski, M. W.) 269–296 (Academic, San Diego, 1997).
Hagemeijer, W. J. M., Blair, M. J., van Turnhout, C., Bekhuis, J. & Bijlsma, R. EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: their Distribution and Abundance (Poyser, London, 1997).
Berendse, F., Aerts, R. & Bobbink, R. in Landscape Ecology of a Stressed Environment (eds Vos, C. C. & Opdam, P.) 104–121 (Chapman and Hall, London, 1993).
Bakker, J. P. & Berendse, F. Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 63–68 (1999).
Milsom, T. P., Ennis, D. C., Haskell, D. J., Langton, S. D. & McKay, H. V. Design of grassland feeding areas for waders during winter: the relative importance of sward, landscape factors and human disturbance. Biol. Conserv. 84, 119–129 (1998).
Henderson, I. G., Vickery, J. A. & Fuller, R. J. Summer bird abundance and distribution on set-aside fields on intensive arable farms in England. Ecography 23, 50–59 (2000).
Standen, V. Production and diversity of enchytraeids, earthworms and plants in fertilized hay meadow plots. J. Appl. Ecol. 21, 293–312 (1984).
Beintema, A. J. & Müskens, G. J. D. M. Nesting success of birds breeding in Dutch agricultural grasslands. J. Appl. Ecol. 24, 743–758 (1987).
Schekkerman, H. & Müskens, G. Do Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa breeding in agricultural grasslands produce sufficient young for a stable population? Limosa 73, 121–134 (2000).
Kokko, H. & Sutherland, W. J. Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evol. Ecol. Res. 31, 537–551 (2001).
Branquart, E. & Hemptinne, J. L. Selectivity in the exploitation of floral resources by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphinae). Ecography 23, 732–742 (2000).
MacDonald, D. et al. Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response. J. Env. Manag. 59, 47–69 (2000).
Bignal, E. M. Using an ecological understanding of farmland to reconcile nature conservation requirements, EU agricultural policy and world trade agreements. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 949–954 (1998).
Evans, A. in Farming and Birds in Europe: the Common Agricultural Policy and its Implications for Bird Conservation (eds Pain, D. J. & Pienkowski, M. W.) 331–357 (Academic, San Diego, 1997).
Chamberlain, D. E., Wilson, A. M., Browne, S. J. & Vickery, J. A. Effects of habitat type and management on the abundance of skylarks in the breeding season. J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 856–870 (1999).
Ovenden, G. N., Swash, A. R. H. & Smallshire, D. Agri-environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 955–960 (1998).
Banaszak, J. Studies on methods of censusing the number of bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Pol. Ecol. Stud. 9, 421–505 (1983).
van Dijk, A. J. Surveying Breeding Birds in Sample Plots (Manual of the Breeding Bird Monitoring Project (in Dutch) (SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, The Netherlands, 1996).
Patterson, H. D. & Thompson, R. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58, 545–554 (1971).
Committee of the Statistics Department. Genstat 5 Release 3 Reference Manual (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1993).
We thank all farmers who gave us permission to work on their fields, and Dienst Landelÿk Gebred for their assistance with the area and field selection. The comments of N. van Breemen, W. ter Keurs, M. Noordervliet and J. Harvey improved this manuscript. Field assistance from B. Brak, J. Smit, M. Gleichman, M. Meijer zu Schlochtern, L. de Nijs and H. Klees is greatly appreciated. This work was funded by the Dutch Stimulation Program Biodiversity.
About this article
Cite this article
Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R. et al. Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413, 723–725 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35099540
Permanent grassland classifications predict agronomic and environmental characteristics well, but not ecological characteristics
Ecological Indicators (2020)
Mowing is the greatest threat to Whinchat Saxicola rubetra nests even when compared to several natural induced threats
Journal for Nature Conservation (2020)
Determinants for the Implementation of Action-, Result- and Multi-Actor-Oriented Agri-Environment Schemes in Switzerland
Ecological Economics (2020)
Positive effects of set-asides on European hare (Lepus europaeus) populations: Leverets benefit from an enhanced survival rate
Biological Conservation (2020)
Biologia Futura (2020)