Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Pack formation in cycling and orienteering

Avoiding conditions that draw competitors together may be a better way to test ability.

## Abstract

In cycling and orienteering competitions, competitors can become bunched into packs, which may mask an individual's true ability. Here we model this process with a view to determining when competitors' times are determined more by others than by their own ability. Our results may prove useful in helping to stage events so that pack formation can be avoided.

## Main

We integrated equations of motion in discrete time steps for interacting competitors moving in one dimension from start to finish, with passing allowed. Individually, the ith competitor moves at speed ui, which increases by ui × b (where b represents the 'boost' factor) when another competitor is within a certain range ahead.

The appropriate percentage value for the boost and length of the range will be different for different sports, but the same for different competition formats in the same sport. In cycling (Fig. 1), the boost is due to aerodynamic and psychological effects1, whereas in orienteering it occurs when a competitor is able to follow another within sight without the need to map-read. In each case, the leading competitor is unaffected. The number of competitors, distribution of ui values, and initial separations depend on the particular competition and may vary between races. For mass starts (zero initial separation), maximal bunching is seen to occur immediately. In time trials (constant initial separation, with ui distributed randomly), packs are ultimately formed, but often only after a considerable time.

Interesting cases are chasing starts, in which competitors are approximately sorted by ui. For example, competitors' cycling start times in triathlons are determined by swim time (as swimming immediately preceeds cycling), which is correlated with cycling ability, and start times in some orienteering events are determined by a preliminary race. Here packs are formed after a short time, if at all. After a longer time, these packs (or individuals) move steadily apart. This reveals a sharp cross-over between packing and non-packing behaviour: below a critical ratio of range to starting interval, most competitors move individually and move steadily further apart. Above this critical ratio, however, packs form that catch and absorb individuals.

Surprisingly, the position of the crossover depends on a single criterion: the fraction (F) of competitors who have abilities within the boost factor and who are able to get within range of others in the absence of boost interactions. If F > 13% (the critical threshold; Fig. 2), all competitors are rapidly swept into packs. In time trials, the onset of pack formation coincides with the time required to meet this criterion; b and ui determine pack size.

Pack formation is stable against random fluctuations of ui at each time point, provided that these are less than b, and is unchanged by adding a further boost that is proportional to pack size, or by making b range-dependent.

Data are available from orienteering races2 in which competitors are electronically timed at a series of checkpoints. Our position/time simulation data compare well qualitatively to actual races, and the F = 13% threshold distinguishes those races in which pack formation dominates. Our results seem to be qualitatively similar to the formation of shockwaves or traffic jams3, but an important difference is that our packs tend to be composed of the same competitors throughout.

We have derived the conditions for pack formation: packs form in chasing and time-trial races when more than 13% of competitors encounter others who are then able to stay with them because of the benefits of following.

## References

1. Olds, T. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 77, 492–497 (1998).

2. British Orienteering Federation results. http://www.cix.co.uk/~bof (2001).

3. Nagel, K. & Schreckenberg, M. J. Physique 2, 2221–2229 (1992).

Download references

## Author information

Authors

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. J. Ackland.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Ackland, G., Butler, D. Pack formation in cycling and orienteering. Nature 413, 127 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35093156

Download citation

• Issue Date:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35093156

## Further reading

• ### Pacing Decision Making in Sport and the Effects of Interpersonal Competition: A Critical Review

• Marco J. Konings
• Florentina J. Hettinga

Sports Medicine (2018)

• ### Cyclists sent packing

• Helen Pearson

Nature (2001)

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

## Search

### Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing