News | Published:

Animal data jeopardized by life behind bars

Subjects

San Francisco

Research animals raised in standard laboratory cages appear to develop a brain defect that could affect the outcome of experiments, according to behavioural scientists.

The findings, presented last week at the 35th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology at the University of California, Davis, are likely to spark debate among neuroscientists about the wisdom of keeping laboratory mice in austere, standard cages.

Cages that provide more stimulating environments for animals could help solve the problem, researchers say. But space constraints and concerns about standardization of experiments have so far kept such innovations out of most animal research facilities.

Previous studies established that adding nesting material or littermates to cages increases the number and density of neurons in animals' brains. Rats and mice in enriched cages also perform better in memory tests (see Nature Rev. Neurosci. 1, 191–198; 2000).

Even so, their less astute cohorts reared alone in standard shoebox-sized cages have still been regarded by most researchers as normal. But the new evidence — presented by Joseph Garner, a behavioural scientist at the University of California, Davis — challenges that assumption. Garner's data suggest that the brains of animals housed in barren environments are severely abnormal.

Caged animals often develop repetitive behaviour patterns called stereotypies, Garner said. They pace, groom themselves incessantly, or gnaw the bars of the cage for hours.

In humans, stereotypies are thought to indicate brain damage in a region of the brain known as the basal ganglia, which regulates the initiation of movements. But cage-induced stereotypies have been regarded as merely excessive indulgence in normal behaviour, caused by an abnormal environment.

Garner and his colleagues said that they have now shown that the stereotypies reflect permanent brain dysfunction in parrots. Garner monitored parrot behaviour with a psychological test normally used to diagnose damage to the basal ganglia in humans. The birds that showed little or no stereotypic behaviour did best on the test, whereas those that spent a lot of time in repeated feather-plucking, for example, failed the test.

Garner believes that the result links the stereotypies to brain defects, and probably applies across species. He has already completed similar studies in voles and is now beginning to work with mice.

Stir crazy: mice housed in standard lab cages exhibit a range of abnormal repetitive behaviours. Credit: HANNO WÜRBEL

Cage-induced stereotypies were not known in rats and mice until 1996, when Hanno Würbel, an animal behaviourist at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, used an infrared camera to record the behaviour of these nocturnal creatures at night. In the dark, the vast majority of mice engaged in behaviours such as repetitive bar biting and cage scratching. But most people who work with mice are unaware of the problem, because they only handle the animals in the light.

Even if brain defects turn out to be widespread in cage-reared animals, it is not clear how this will affect research. For many types of experiment, it may matter little. “If the process being studied is fundamental, it should reveal itself over and above these differences,” says Fred Gage, a neurobiologist at the Salk Institute in La Jolla, California.

“The stereotypy effects might not matter if they were the same across all labs,” says Georgia Mason, a zoologist at the University of Oxford and Garner's graduate adviser. “But what we find is that stereotypy varies quite a bit.”

“The irony is that all this barren environment that has been put upon animals for standardization may be the source of the variability,” Garner says.

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.