Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations

Abstract

There has been considerable research on both top-down effects1,2 and on disturbances3,4,5 in ecological communities; however, the interaction between the two, when the disturbance is catastrophic, has rarely been examined6. Predators may increase the probability of prey extinction resulting from a catastrophic disturbance both by reducing prey population size7,8 and by changing ecological traits of prey individuals such as habitat characteristics8,9 in a way that increases the vulnerability of prey species to extinction. We show that a major hurricane in the Bahamas led to the extinction of lizard populations on most islands onto which a predator had been experimentally introduced, whereas no populations became extinct on control islands. Before the hurricane, the predator had reduced prey populations to about half of those on control islands. Two months after the hurricane, we found only recently hatched individuals—apparently lizards survived the inundating storm surge only as eggs. On predator-introduction islands, those hatchling populations were a smaller fraction of pre-hurricane populations than on control islands. Egg survival allowed rapid recovery of prey populations to pre-hurricane levels on all control islands but on only a third of predator-introduction islands—the other two-thirds lost their prey populations. Thus climatic disturbance compounded by predation brought prey populations to extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Properties of populations of the lizard Anolis sagrei before and after hurricane Floyd.
Figure 2: The abundance distribution of A. sagrei on all islands combined before (a) and after (b) hurricane Floyd.
Figure 3: Mortality and recovery or extinction of the lizard A. sagrei from hurricane Floyd.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R. & Kitchell, J. F. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 483–488 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitz, O. J., Hamback, P. A. & Beckerman, A. P. Trophic cascades in terrestrial systems: a review of the effects of carnivore removals on plants. Am. Nat. 155, 141–153 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sousa, W. P. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 353–392 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pickett, S. T. A. & White, P. S. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics (Academic, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunson, W. A. & Travis, J. The role of abiotic factors in community organization. Am. Nat. 101, 97–107 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Power, M. E., Parker, M. S. & Wootton, J. T. in Food Webs (eds Polis, G. A. & Winemiller, K. O.) 286–297 (Chapman and Hall, London/New York, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Sih, A., Crowley, P., McPeek, M., Petranka, J. & Strohmeirer, K. Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 269–311 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abrams, P. A. Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring indirect effects in ecological communities. Am. Nat. 146, 112–134 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitz, O. J., Beckerman, A. P. & O'Brien, K. M. Behaviourally-mediated trophic cascades: the effects of predation risk on food web interactions. Ecology 78, 1388–1399 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoener, T. W., Slade, J. B. & Stinson, C. H. Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus Leiocephalus of the Bahamas. Oecologia 53, 160–169 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Losos, J. B. Predation upon a devastating predator: can the latter's food-web effects be reversed? Ecol. Monogr. (submitted).

  12. Gerber, S. P. & Echternacht, A. C. Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards. Oecologia 124, 599–607 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Andrewartha, H. G. & Birch, L. C. Distribution and Abundance of Animals (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Menge, B. A. & Sutherland, J. P. Species diversity gradients: synthesis of the role of predation, competition and temporal heterogeneity. Am. Nat. 110, 351–369 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schoener, T. W. in Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes (eds Matthews, W. J. & Heins, D. C.) 8–16 (Univ. Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiens, J. A. On competition and variable environments. Am. Sci. 65, 590–597 (1977).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. Community Ecology (Harper & Row, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, E. W. Influence of weather on predator/prey relations: stinkbugs and tent caterpillars. J. NY Entomol. Soc. 90, 241–246 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Holt, R. & Lawton, J. H. The ecological consequences of shared natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 495–520 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schoener, T. W. & Spiller, D. A. Devastation of prey diversity by experimentally introduced predators in the field. Nature 381, 691–694 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Spiller, D. A., Losos, J. B. & Schoener, T. W. Impact of a catastrophic hurricane on island populations. Science 281, 695–697 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ackerman, J. New eyes on the ocean. Nat. Geogr. Mag. Oct. 86–114 (2000).

  23. Kareiva, P. M., Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B. (eds) Biotic Interactions and Global Change (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schwartz, A. & Henderson, R. W. Amphibians and Reptiles of the West Indies 424 (Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schoener, T. W. Presence and absence of habitat shift in some widespread lizard species. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 233–258 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schoener, T. W. The Anolis lizards of Bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49, 704–726 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heckel, D. G. & Roughgarden, J. A technique for estimating the size of lizard populations. Ecology 60, 966–975 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fienberg, S. E. The multiple-recapture census. Biometrika 45, 591–603 (1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. Jr Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 128–137 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the NSF for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas W. Schoener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoener, T., Spiller, D. & Losos, J. Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations. Nature 412, 183–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35084071

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35084071

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing