Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Motion-induced blindness in normal observers

Abstract

Cases in which salient visual stimuli do not register consciously are known to occur in special conditions, such as the presentation of dissimilar stimuli to the two eyes1 or when images are stabilized on the retina2. Here, we report a striking phenomenon of ‘visual disappearance’ observed with normal-sighted observers under natural conditions. When a global moving pattern is superimposed on high-contrast stationary or slowly moving stimuli, the latter disappear and reappear alternately for periods of several seconds. We show that this motion-induced blindness (MIB) phenomenon is unlikely to reflect retinal suppression, sensory masking or adaptation. The phenomenology observed includes perceptual grouping effects, object rivalry and visual field anisotropy. This is very similar to that found in other types of visual disappearance, as well as in clinical cases of attention deficits, in which partial invisibility might occur despite the primary visual areas being intact3. Disappearance might reflect a disruption of attentional processing, which shifts the system into a winner-takes-all mode, uncovering the dynamics of competition between object representations within the human visual system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Typical stimuli used to measure the motion-induced blindness (MIB) effect and typical data showing its magnitude.
Figure 2: The effects of different parameters on the motion-induced blindness phenomenon.
Figure 3: Gestalt effects reflected in the motion-induced blindness phenomena.
Figure 4: Co-operation and rivalry of non-overlapping stimuli under MIB conditions.

References

  1. Breese, B. B. On inhibition. Psychol. Monogr. 3, 1–65 (1899).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ditchburn, R. W. & Ginsborg, B. L. Vision with a stabilized retinal image. Nature 170, 36–37 (1952).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Driver, J. & Vuilleumier, P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition 79, 39–88 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O'Regan, J., Rensink, R. & Clark, J. Change-blindness as a result of ‘mudsplashes’. Nature 398, 34 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blake, R. A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychol. Rev. 96, 145–167 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, F. W., Glinsky, A. S., Howel, E. R., Riggs, L. A. & Atkinson, J. The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation. Perception 2, 123–125 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews, T. J. & Purves, D. Similarities in normal and binocularly rivalrous viewing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 9905–9908 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennet-Clark, H. & Evans, C. Fragmentation of patterned targets when viewed as prolonged after-images. Nature 199, 1215–1216 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Troxler, D. in Ophthalmologisches Bibliothek (eds Himly, K. & Schmidt, J. A.) 51–53 (Fromman, Jena, 1804).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luria, A. R. Disorders of ‘simultaneous perception’ in a case of bilateral occipito-parietal brain injury. Brain 82, 437–449 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rizzo, M. & Robin, D. A. Simultanagnosia: a defect of sustained attention yields insights on visual information processing. Neurology 40, 447–455 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grindley, G. C. & Townsend, V. Binocular masking induced by a moving object. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 17, 97–109 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grindley, G. C. & Townsend, V. Further experiments on movement masking. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 18, 319–326 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonneh, Y., Cooperman, A. & Sagi, D. Loss of local pattern visibility in global shape perception. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. (Suppl.) 40, 4253 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Livingstone, M. S. & Hubel, D. H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J. Neurosci. 7, 3416–3468 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Evans, C. Some studies of pattern perception using a stabilized retinal image. Br. J. Psychol. 56, 121–133 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kovac’s, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M. & Feher, A. When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 15508–15511 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker, P. The perceptual fragmentation of unstabilized images. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 28, 35–45 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukuda, H. & Blake, R. Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 362–370 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bonneh, Y. & Sagi, D. Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry. Vision Res. 39, 271–281 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Burbeck, C. & Kelly, D. Role of local adaptation in the fading of stabilized images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1, 216–220 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Logothetis, N. K. Single units and conscious vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1801–1818 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MacKay, D. M. in Visual Neuroscience (eds Pettigrew, J., Sanderson, K. & Levick, W.) 365–373 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, New York, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pettigrew, J. D. & Funk, A. P. Opposing effects on perceptual rivalry caused by right vs. left TMS. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.(in the press).

  25. Duncan, J., Humphreys, G. & Ward, R. Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 7, 255–261 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Colby, C. & Goldberg, M. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 319–349 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. D. Mollon for recently drawing our attention to the work of Grindley and Townsend13. We thank E. Freeman, B. Zenger, S. Gepshtein, H. Reed, J. Pettigrew and M. Merzenich for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoram S. Bonneh.

Supplementary information

This demo demonstrates several properties of the Motion Induced Blindness (MIB) phenomenon. It is implemented as a set of GIF animation and can only be appreciated if the apparent motion appears smooth or almost smooth. In general, fixate in the center or lower part of the screen without moving the eyes, pay attention to the moving pattern and observe what happens to the static yellow dots. For better results, download an executable version of the demo, available for Linux x86 and Windows systems. The demo is best perceived in the dark.

Properties

  • Basic effect

  • Target luminance: Low, High

  • Target movement: Slow, Fast

  • Target dynamics: Flicker, Local rotation

  • Target size

  • The spatial extent: "Protection zones"

  • Mask properties: 3D slow, 2D, 1D, Noise, Few dots

Gestalt Effects

  • Contour smoothness: Smooth, Jagged

  • Proximity: High, Low

  • Object competition: Ellipses, Triangles

  • Gabor competition & cooperation: Collinear, Orthogonal

Links to mini website with demonstrations of the illusions and downloadable .exe files (ZIP 9 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonneh, Y., Cooperman, A. & Sagi, D. Motion-induced blindness in normal observers. Nature 411, 798–801 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35081073

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35081073

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing