Competitive interactions between plants determine the success of individuals and species. In developing forests, competition for light is the predominant factor. Shade tolerators acclimate photosynthetically to low light1,2,3 and are capable of long-term survival under the shade cast by others, whereas shade avoiders rapidly dominate gaps but are overtaken in due course by shade-tolerant, later successional species. Shade avoidance4,5,6 results from the phytochrome-mediated perception of far-red radiation (700–800 nm) scattered from the leaves of neighbours, provides early warning of shading7, and induces developmental responses that, when successful, result in the overgrowth of those neighbours8. Shade tolerators cast a deep shade, whereas less-tolerant species cast light shade9, and saplings tend to have high survivorship in shade cast by conspecific adults, but high rates of mortality when shaded by more-tolerant species9. Here we report a parallel relationship in which the shade-avoidance responses of three tree species are inversely proportional to proximity signals generated by those species. On this basis, early successional species generate small proximity signals but react strongly to them, whereas late successional species react weakly but generate strong signals.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Boardman, N. K. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28, 355–377 (1977).
Bjørkman, O. in Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology Vol. 12.4 (eds Lange O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. & Ziegler, H.) 57–107 (Springer, Berlin, 1981).
Kull, O & Niinemets, U. Distribution of leaf photosynthetic properties in tree canopies: comparison of species with different shade tolerance. Funct. Ecol. 12, 472–479 (1998).
Smith, H. Light quality, photoperception and plant strategy. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 481–518 (1982).
Smith, H. Physiological and ecological function within the phytochrome family. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 289–315 (1995).
Smith, H. Phytochromes and light signal perception by plants - an emerging synthesis. Nature 407, 585–591 (2000).
Ballare, C. L., Scopel, A. L. & Sanchez, R. A. Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science 247, 329–332 (1990).
Casal, J. J. & Smith, H. The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light-grown plants. Plant Cell Environ. 12, 855–862 (1989).
Canham, C. D., Finzi, A. C., Pacala, S. W. & Burbank, D. H. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests - interspecific variation in light transmission by canopy trees. Can. J. Forest Res. 24, 337–349 (1994).
Smith, H. & Holmes, M. G. The function of phytochrome in the natural environment. III. Measurement and calculation of phytochrome photoequilibrium. Photochem. Photobiol. 25, 547–550 (1977).
Morgan, D. C. & Smith, H. Linear relationship between phytochrome photoequilibrium and growth in plants under simulated natural radiation. Nature 262, 210–212 (1976).
Gilbert, I. R., Seavers, G. P., Jarvis, P. G. & Smith, H. Photomorphogenesis and canopy dynamics. Phytochrome-mediated proximity perception accounts for the growth dynamics of canopies of Populus trichocarpa × deltoides ‘Beaupré’. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 475–449 (1995).
Morgan, D. C., Smith, H. A systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145, 253–259 (1979).
Lei, T. T & Lechowicz, M. J. Diverse responses of maple saplings to forest light regimes. Am. J. Bot. 82, 9–19 (1998).
Child, R., Morgan, D. C. & Smith, H. Control of development in Chenopodium album by shadelight: The effect of light quality (red:far-red ratio) on morphogenesis. New Phytol. 89, 545–555 (1981).
Hayward, P. M. in Techniques in Photomorphogenesis (eds Smith, H. & Holmes, M. G.) 159–173 (Academic, London, 1984).
This research was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, UK, and was made possible by the technical assistance of S. Smith, M. Pratt and G. Benskin.
About this article
Cite this article
Gilbert, I., Jarvis, P. & Smith, H. Proximity signal and shade avoidance differences between early and late successional trees. Nature 411, 792–795 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35081062
Photosynthesis Research (2019)
Phenotypic plasticity influences the success of clonal propagation in industrial pharmaceutical Cannabis sativa
PLOS ONE (2019)
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology (2019)
Journal of The Royal Society Interface (2018)
Recruitment Niches of Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Vell.) Morong: Functional Acclimations to Light