A freely diffusible form of Sonic hedgehog mediates long-range signalling

Article metrics


The secreted protein Sonic hedgehog (Shh) exerts many of its patterning effects through a combination of short- and long-range signalling1,2,3. Three distinct mechanisms, which are not necessarily mutually exclusive, have been proposed to account for the long-range effects of Shh: simple diffusion of Shh, a relay mechanism in which Shh activates secondary signals, and direct delivery of Shh through cytoplasmic extensions, termed cytonemes. Although there is much data (using soluble recombinant Shh (ShhN)) to support the simple diffusion model of long-range Shh signalling1,2, there has been little evidence to date for a native form of Shh that is freely diffusible and not membrane-associated. Here we provide evidence for a freely diffusible form of Shh (s-ShhNp) that is cholesterol modified, multimeric and biologically potent. We further demonstrate that the availability of s-ShhNp is regulated by two functional antagonists of the Shh pathway, Patched (Ptc) and Hedgehog-interacting protein (Hip)4,5,6. Finally, we show a gradient of s-ShhNp across the anterior–posterior axis of the chick limb, demonstrating the physiological relevance of s-ShhNp.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Identification of a soluble form of Shh.
Figure 2: Soluble Shh activity is inhibited by Shh functional antagonists.
Figure 3: -ShhNp is a highly potent, multimeric form of ShhNp.
Figure 4: -ShhNp exists in an anterior–posterior gradient.


  1. 1

    Johnson, R. L. & Tabin, C. The long and short of hedgehog signaling. Cell 81, 313–316 (1995).

  2. 2

    McMahon, A. P. More surprises in the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Cell 100, 185–188 (2000).

  3. 3

    Chuang, P. & Kornberg, T. B. On the range of hedgehog signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 515–522 (2000).

  4. 4

    Chen, Y. & Struhl, G. Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87, 553–563 (1996).

  5. 5

    Chuang, P. T. & McMahon, A. P. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog-binding protein. Nature 397, 617–621 (1999).

  6. 6

    Goodrich, L. V., Jung, D., Higgins, K. M. & Scott, M. P. Overexpression of ptc1 inhibits induction of Shh target genes and prevents normal patterning in the neural tube. Dev. Biol. 211, 323–334 (1999).

  7. 7

    Nakamura, T. et al. Induction of osteogenic differentiation by hedgehog proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 237, 465–469 (1997).

  8. 8

    Pepinsky, R. B. et al. Identification of a palmitic acid-modified form of human Sonic hedgehog. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14037–14045 (1998).

  9. 9

    Bumcrot, D. A., Takada, R. & McMahon, A. P. Proteolytic processing yields two secreted forms of sonic hedgehog. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2294–2303 (1995).

  10. 10

    Porter, J. A. et al. The product of hedgehog autoproteolytic cleavage active in local and long-range signalling. Nature 374, 363–366 (1995).

  11. 11

    Taipale, J. et al. Effects of oncogenic mutations in Smoothened and Patched can be reversed by cyclopamine. Nature 406, 1005–1009 (2000).

  12. 12

    Ericson, J., Morton, S., Kawakami, A., Roelink, H. & Jessell, T. M. Two critical periods of Sonic Hedgehog signaling required for the specification of motor neuron identity. Cell 87, 661–673 (1996).

  13. 13

    Cooper, M. K., Porter, J. A., Young, K. E. & Beachy, P. A. Teratogen-mediated inhibition of target tissue response to Shh signaling. Science 280, 1603–1607 (1998).

  14. 14

    Incardona, J. P., Gaffield, W., Kapur, R. P. & Roelink, H. The teratogenic Veratrum alkaloid cyclopamine inhibits Sonic hedgehog signal transduction. Development 125, 3553–3562 (1998).

  15. 15

    Tickle, C. Morphogen gradients in vertebrate limb development. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 345–351 (1999).

  16. 16

    Yang, Y. et al. Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. Development 124, 4393–4404 (1997).

  17. 17

    Lopez-Martinez, A. et al. Limb-patterning activity and restricted posterior localization of the amino-terminal product of Sonic hedgehog cleavage. Curr. Biol. 5, 791–796 (1995).

  18. 18

    Marti, E., Takada, R., Bumcrot, D. A., Sasaki, H. & McMahon, A. P. Distribution of Sonic hedgehog peptides in the developing chick and mouse embryo. Development 121, 2537–2547 (1995).

  19. 19

    Wang, B., Fallon, J. F. & Beachy, P. A. Hedgehog-regulated processing of Gli3 produces an anterior/posterior repressor gradient in the developing vertebrate limb. Cell 100, 423–434 (2000).

  20. 20

    Riddle, R. D., Johnson, R. L., Laufer, E. & Tabin, C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 75, 1401–1416 (1993).

  21. 21

    Chang, D. T. et al. Products, genetic linkage and limb patterning activity of a murine hedgehog gene. Development 120, 3339–3353 (1994).

  22. 22

    Wolpert, L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 25, 1–47 (1969).

  23. 23

    Burke, R. et al. Dispatched, a novel sterol-sensing domain protein dedicated to the release of cholesterol-modified hedgehog from signaling cells. Cell 99, 803–815 (1999).

  24. 24

    The, I., Bellaiche, Y. & Perrimon, N. Hedgehog movement is regulated through tout velu-dependent synthesis of a heparan sulfate proteoglycan. Mol. Cell 4, 633–639 (1999).

  25. 25

    Guy, R. K. Inhibition of sonic hedgehog autoprocessing in cultured mammalian cells by sterol deprivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7307–7312 (2000).

  26. 26

    Porter, J. A., Young, K. E. & Beachy, P. A. Cholesterol modification of hedgehog signaling proteins in animal development. Science 274, 255–259 (1996).

  27. 27

    Robbins, D. J. et al. Hedgehog elicits signal transduction by means of a large complex containing the kinesin-related protein COSTAL2. Cell 90, 225–234 (1997).

  28. 28

    Bell, S. M., Schreiner, C. M. & Scott, W. J. Transspecies grafting as a tool to understand the basis of murine developmental limb abnormalities. Methods Mol. Biol. 136, 219–226 (2000).

Download references


We thank the members of the Robbins' laboratory and A. J. Capobianco, Y. Sanchez, T. Doetschman, L. A. Woollett, S. M. Bell, X. Lin and K. E. Yutzey for discussions. D.J.R. is a recipient of a Burroughs Wellcome Career Development Award.This work was supported by Grants from the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Correspondence to David J. Robbins.

Supplementary information

Four supplementary figures and legends

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.