Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers

Abstract

Hybridization in natural populations is strongly selected against when hybrid offspring have reduced fitness. Here we show that, paradoxically, pairing with another species may offer the best fitness return for an individual, despite reduced fitness of hybrid offspring. Two mechanisms reduce the costs to female collared flycatchers of pairing with male pied flycatchers. A large proportion of young are sired by conspecific male collared flycatchers through extra-pair copulations, and there is a bias in favour of male offspring (which, unlike females, are fertile) within hybrid pairs. In combination with temporal variation in breeding success, these cost-reducing mechanisms yield quantitative predictions about when female collared flycatchers should accept a male pied flycatcher as a mate; empirical data agree with these predictions. Apparent hybridization may thus represent adaptive mate choice under some circumstances.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Male share of paternity in relation to pairing type in flycatcher families.
Figure 2: Effect of pairing type on sex ratio and viability of brood.
Figure 3: Numbers of recruited offspring and grand-offspring for each pairing type.
Figure 4: Breeding time, reproductive success, and mating decisions in flycatchers.

References

  1. 1

    Arnold, M. L. Natural Hybridization and evolution 7 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Hybridization of bird species. Sciences 256, 193–197 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Hybridization, sexual imprinting, and mate choice. Am. Nat. 149, 1–28 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Alatalo, R. V., Eriksson, D., Gustafsson, L. & Lundberg, A. Hybridization between pied and collared flycatchers: sexual selection and speciation theory. J. Evol. Biol. 3, 375–389 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Gelter, H. P., Tegelström, H. & Gustafsson, L. Evidence from hatching success and DNA fingerprinting for the fertility of hybrid pied × collared flycatchers. Ficedula hypoleuca × albicollis. Ibis 134, 62–68 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Saetre, G.-P., Kral, M., Bures, S. & Ims, R. A. Dynamics of a clinal hybrid zone and a comparison with island hybrid zones of flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca and F. albicollis). J. Zool. 247, 53–64 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Saetre, G.-P. et al. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387, 589–592 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lundberg, A. & Alatalo, R. V. The Pied Flycatcher 121 (Poyser, London, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hubbs, C. L. Hybridization between fish species. System. Zool. 4, 1–20 (1955).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Saetre, G.-P., Král, M. & Bures, S. Differential species recognition abilities of males and females in a flycatcher hybrid zone. J. Avian Biol. 28, 259–263 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Real, L. A. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat. 136, 376–405 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wiggins, D. A., Pärt, T. & Gustafsson, L. Seasonal decline in collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis reproductive success: an experimental approach. Oikos 70, 359–364 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Merilä, J. & Sheldon, B. C. Lifetime reproductive success and heritability in nature. Am. Nat. 155, 301–310 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Verhulst, S., van Balen, J. H. & Tinbergen, J. M. Seasonal decline in reproductive success in the great tit: variation in time or quality? Ecology 76, 2392–2403 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Daan, S., Dijkstra, C. & Tinbergen, J. M. Family planning in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): the ultimate control of covariation of laying date and clutch size. Behaviour 114, 83–116 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Sheldon, B. C. & Ellegren, H. Sexual selection resulting from extra-pair paternity in collared flycatchers. Animal Behav. 57, 285–298 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Saetre, G.-P. & Moum, T. A simple molecular method for species identification of pied and collared flycatchers. Hereditas 132, 171–172 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Price, C. S. C. Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388, 663–666 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Howard, D. J. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30, 109–132 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sheldon, B. C., Räsänen, K. & Dias, P. C. Certainty of paternity and paternal effort in the collared flycatcher. Behav. Ecol. 8, 421–428 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sheldon, B. C. & Ellegren, H. Paternal effort related to experimentally manipulated paternity of male collared flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1737–1742 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Gustafsson, L. in Lifetime Reproduction in Birds (ed. Newton, I.) 75–88 (Academic, London, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Haldane, J. B. S. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12, 101–109 (1922).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ellegren, H., Gustafsson, L. & Sheldon, B. C. Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 11723–11728 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Komdeur, J., Daan, S., Tinbergen, J. & Mateman, A. C. Extreme adaptive modification of the sex ratio of the Seychelles warbler's eggs. Nature 385, 522–525 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Nager, R. G., Monaghan, P., Griffiths, R., Houston, D. C. & Dawson, R. Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 570–573 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Sheldon, B. C., Andersson, S., Griffith, S., Örnborg, J., Sendecka, J. Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402, 874–877 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Liou, L. W. & Price, T. D. Speciation by reinforcement of pre-mating isolation. Evolution 48, 1451–1459 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Higashi, M., Takimoto, G. & Yamamura, N. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Nature 402, 523–526.

  30. 30

    Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & von Schantz, T. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381, 229–232 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Sheldon, B. C., Merilä, J., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. Paternal genetic contribution to offspring condition predicted by relative size of male secondary sexual character. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 297–302 (1997).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Johnsen, A., Anderson, V., Sunding, C. & Lifjeld, J. T. Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature 406, 296–299 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Møller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. Good genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 85–91 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Kirkpatrick, M. & Barton, N. H. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1282–1286 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Møller, A. P. & Ninni, P. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 43, 345–358 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Price, T. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 251–260 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Mild, K. & Shirihai, H. Field identification of pied, collared and semi-collared flycatchers. Part 2: females in breeding plumage. Bird. World 7, 231–240 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Sheldon, B. C. & Ellegren, H. Offspring sex and paternity in the collared flycatcher. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1017–1021 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Saetre, G.-P. et al. Speciation, introgressive hybridization and non-linear rate of molecular evolution in flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 10, 737–749 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Griffiths, R., Double, M. C., Orr, K. & Dawson, R. J. G. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1071–1075 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Paetkau, D., Calvert, W., Stirling, I. & Strobeck, C. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol. Ecol. 4, 347–354 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Crawley, M. J. GLIM for Ecologists 279 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Przybylo, R., Sheldon, B. C. & Merilä, J. Climatic influences on breeding and morphology evidence for phenotypic plasticity. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 395–403 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the many people that helped to collect data from the Swedish and Czech study populations, particularly J. Träff for providing access to mixed pairs in Sweden, and M. Kral for access to Czech data. P. R. Grant, L. E. B. Kruuk, J. Merilä and T. Price commented on a previous version of the manuscript. The work was funded by grants from the Swedish Natural Sciences Research Council, the Norwegian Research Council, an Erasmus grant to T.V., and by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship to B.C.S.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben C. Sheldon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veen, T., Borge, T., Griffith, S. et al. Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411, 45–50 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35075000

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing