Letter | Published:

The concepts of ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ in an insect

Nature volume 410, pages 930933 (19 April 2001) | Download Citation



Insects process and learn information flexibly to adapt to their environment. The honeybee Apis mellifera constitutes a traditional model for studying learning and memory at behavioural, cellular and molecular levels1. Earlier studies focused on elementary associative and non-associative forms of learning determined by either olfactory conditioning of the proboscis extension reflex1 or the learning of visual stimuli2 in an operant context. However, research has indicated that bees are capable of cognitive performances that were thought to occur only in some vertebrate species. For example, honeybees can interpolate visual information3, exhibit associative recall4,5, categorize visual information6,7,8 and learn contextual information9. Here we show that honeybees can form ‘sameness’ and ‘difference’ concepts. They learn to solve ‘delayed matching-to-sample’ tasks, in which they are required to respond to a matching stimulus, and ‘delayed non-matching-to-sample’ tasks, in which they are required to respond to a different stimulus; they can also transfer the learned rules to new stimuli of the same or a different sensory modality. Thus, not only can bees learn specific objects and their physical parameters, but they can also master abstract inter-relationships, such as sameness and difference.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Learning and memory in honeybees: from behavior to neural substrates. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 379–404 (1996).

  2. 2.

    in Experimental Behavioral Ecology (eds Hölldobler, B. & Lindauer, M.) 55–74 (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 1985).

  3. 3.

    & Learnt sensori-motor mappings in honeybees: interpolation and its possible relevance to navigation. J. Comp. Physiol. A 177, 287–298 (1995).

  4. 4.

    , & Honeybees links sights to smells. Nature 396, 637–638 (1998).

  5. 5.

    , & Honeybee memory: navigation by associative grouping and recall of visual stimuli. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 72, 180–201 (1999).

  6. 6.

    , & Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination. J. Comp. Physiol. A 167, 649–654 (1990).

  7. 7.

    , & Symmetry perception in an insect. Nature 382, 458–461 (1996).

  8. 8.

    & Pattern vision in honeybees (Apis mellifera): flower-like patterns with no predominant orientation. J. Insect Physiol. 41, 681–688 (1994).

  9. 9.

    , , & Places and patterns—a study of context learning in honeybees. J. Comp. Physiol. A 181, 343–353 (1997).

  10. 10.

    & Analysis of oddity learning by rhesus monkeys. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 48, 188–194 (1955).

  11. 11.

    & Comparative studies in simple oddity learning. 1. Cats, racoons, monkeys and chimpanzees. Psychonom. Sci. 5, 13–14 (1966).

  12. 12.

    & A comparison of Cebus albifrons and Samiri sciureus on oddity performance. Anim. Learn. Behav. 1, 151–153 (1973).

  13. 13.

    & Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21, 19–26 (1974).

  14. 14.

    & Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: the effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 30, 177–186 (1978).

  15. 15.

    Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 31, 103–114 (1979).

  16. 16.

    , & Oddity of visual patterns conceptualized by pigeons. Anim. Learn. Behav. 12, 2–6 (1984).

  17. 17.

    , & Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 11, 35–51 (1985).

  18. 18.

    , & Transfer of relational rules in matching and oddity learning by pigeons and corvids. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 37B, 313–332 (1985).

  19. 19.

    , & Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Proc. 14, 140–145 (1988).

  20. 20.

    , , & in Quantitative Analyses Of Behavior: Discrimination Processes Vol. IV (eds Commons, M. L., Herrnstein, R. J. & Wagner, A. R.) 295–317 (Ballinger, Cambridge MA, 1984).

  21. 21.

    Ecological Learning Theory (Routledge, London, 1989).

  22. 22.

    & Cognitive architecture of a mini-brain: the honeybee. Trends Cognit. Sci. 5, 62–71 (2001).

  23. 23.

    The neural basis of associative reward learning in honeybees. Trends Neurosci. 20, 245–252 (1997).

Download references


We thank C. Bönisch and C. Wiley for help with experiments 5 and 6. M.G., A.J. and R.M. were supported by the Special Programme SFB 515 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. M.G. was also supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. S.W.Z. and M.S. were supported partly by a grant from the Human Frontiers in Science Program and from the US Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Office of Naval Research. The two laboratories contributed equally to the work.

Author information


  1. *Neurobiologie, Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Strasse 28/30, 14195 Berlin, Germany

    • Martin Giurfa
    • , Arnim Jenett
    •  & Randolf Menzel
  2. †Ethologie et Cognition Animale, Universite Paul Sabatier, 118 Route de Narbonne, 30162 Toulouse, Cedex 4, France

    • Martin Giurfa
  3. ‡Centre for Visual Science, Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, PO Box 475, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia

    • Shaowu Zhang
    •  & Mandyam V. Srinivasan


  1. Search for Martin Giurfa in:

  2. Search for Shaowu Zhang in:

  3. Search for Arnim Jenett in:

  4. Search for Randolf Menzel in:

  5. Search for Mandyam V. Srinivasan in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Giurfa.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.