Genetic benefits in the shape of ‘good genes’ have been invoked to explain costly female choice in the absence of direct fitness benefits1,2,3. Little genetic variance in fitness traits is expected, however, because directional selection tends to drive beneficial alleles to fixation4,5,6. There seems to be little potential, therefore, for female choice to result in genetic benefits, giving rise to the ‘lek paradox’7,8,9. Nevertheless, evidence shows that genetic variance persists despite directional selection10,11 and genetic benefits of female choice are frequently reported12,13. A theoretical solution to the lek paradox has been proposed on the basis of two assumptions14: that traits are condition-dependent, and that condition shows high genetic variance. The observed genetic variability in sexual traits will be accounted for, because a proportion of the genetic variance in condition will be captured and expressed in the trait14. Here we report results from experiments showing that male courtship rate in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus is a condition-dependent trait that is preferred by females. More importantly, male condition has high genetic variance and is genetically correlated with courtship rate. Our results thereby represent a significant step towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 25 March 2019
BMC Evolutionary Biology Open Access 09 August 2011
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Open Access 05 January 2011
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Andersson, M. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).
Pomiankowski, A. N. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 136–184 (1988).
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994).
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1958).
Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, New York, 1989).
Roff, D. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).
Borgia, G. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) 19–80 (Academic, New York, 1979).
Taylor, P. D. & Williams, G. C. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Pop. Biol. 22, 392–409 (1982).
Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).
Houle, D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130, 195–204 (1992).
Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A. P. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 21–29 (1995).
Møller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 85–91 (1999).
Alatalo, R. V., Kotiaho, J., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. Mate choice for offspring performance: major benefits or minor costs? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2297–2301 (1998).
Rowe, L. & Houle, D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1415–1421 (1996).
Johnstone, R. A. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol. Rev. 70, 1–65 (1995).
Kotiaho, J. S. Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48, 188–194 (2000).
Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F. & Burke, T. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400, 358–360 (1999).
David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406, 186–188 (2000).
Merilä, J. Genetic variation in offspring condition: an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 10, 465–474 (1996).
Sheldon, B. C., Merilä, J., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. Paternal genetic contribution of offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 297–302 (1997).
Merilä, J., Przybylo, R. & Sheldon, B. C. Genetic variation and natural selection on blue tit body condition in different environments. Genet. Res. 73, 165–176 (1999).
Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38, 709–719 (1984).
Schluter, D. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42, 849–861 (1988).
Jakob, E. M., Marshall, S. D. & Uetz, G. W. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77, 61–67 (1996).
Kotiaho, J. S. Estimating fitness: comparison of body condition indices revisited. Oikos 87, 399–400 (1999).
Wilkinson, G. S. & Taper, M. Evolution of genetic variation for condition-dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1685–1690 (1999).
Gil, D., Graves, J., Hazon, N. & Wells, A. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286, 126–128 (1999).
Cunningham, E. J. & Russell, A. F. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404, 74–77 (2000).
Sheldon, B. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 397–402 (2000).
Hunt, J. & Simmons, L. W. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: an experimental examination of the honest signalling hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 109–114 (1997).
We thank J. Hunt for help during breeding of the beetles; R. Alatalo and J. Reynolds for discussions; and R. Alatalo for comments on the manuscript. J.S.K. was supported by the Academy of Finland, L.W.S. by the ARC and J.L.T. by a postdoctoral research fellowship from the University of Western Australia.
About this article
Cite this article
Kotiaho, J., Simmons, L. & Tomkins, J. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410, 684–686 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35070557
This article is cited by
Stress-induced changes in body surface temperature are repeatable, but do not differ between urban and rural birds
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2021)
Nature Communications (2019)
Relationships between male attractiveness, female remating, and sperm competition in the cigarette beetle
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2017)
Within- and among-population impact of genetic erosion on adult fitness-related traits in the European tree frog Hyla arborea