Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Towards a resolution of the lek paradox

Abstract

Genetic benefits in the shape of ‘good genes’ have been invoked to explain costly female choice in the absence of direct fitness benefits1,2,3. Little genetic variance in fitness traits is expected, however, because directional selection tends to drive beneficial alleles to fixation4,5,6. There seems to be little potential, therefore, for female choice to result in genetic benefits, giving rise to the ‘lek paradox’7,8,9. Nevertheless, evidence shows that genetic variance persists despite directional selection10,11 and genetic benefits of female choice are frequently reported12,13. A theoretical solution to the lek paradox has been proposed on the basis of two assumptions14: that traits are condition-dependent, and that condition shows high genetic variance. The observed genetic variability in sexual traits will be accounted for, because a proportion of the genetic variance in condition will be captured and expressed in the trait14. Here we report results from experiments showing that male courtship rate in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus is a condition-dependent trait that is preferred by females. More importantly, male condition has high genetic variance and is genetically correlated with courtship rate. Our results thereby represent a significant step towards a resolution of the lek paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Probability of mating ± s.e. as a function of courtship rate.
Figure 2: Condition dependence of courtship rate.
Figure 3: Genetic variation in condition.

References

  1. Andersson, M. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pomiankowski, A. N. The evolution of female mate preferences for male genetic quality. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 5, 136–184 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson, M. Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1958).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (Longman, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Roff, D. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Borgia, G. in Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (eds Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A.) 19–80 (Academic, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Taylor, P. D. & Williams, G. C. The lek paradox is not resolved. Theor. Pop. Biol. 22, 392–409 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkpatrick, M. & Ryan, M. J. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350, 33–38 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Houle, D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130, 195–204 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pomiankowski, A. & Møller, A. P. A resolution of the lek paradox. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 21–29 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Møller, A. P. & Alatalo, R. V. Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 85–91 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alatalo, R. V., Kotiaho, J., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. Mate choice for offspring performance: major benefits or minor costs? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2297–2301 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowe, L. & Houle, D. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1415–1421 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnstone, R. A. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol. Rev. 70, 1–65 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotiaho, J. S. Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48, 188–194 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. F. & Burke, T. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400, 358–360 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406, 186–188 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Merilä, J. Genetic variation in offspring condition: an experiment. Funct. Ecol. 10, 465–474 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheldon, B. C., Merilä, J., Qvarnström, A., Gustafsson, L. & Ellegren, H. Paternal genetic contribution of offspring condition predicted by size of male secondary sexual character. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 297–302 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Merilä, J., Przybylo, R. & Sheldon, B. C. Genetic variation and natural selection on blue tit body condition in different environments. Genet. Res. 73, 165–176 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnold, S. J. & Wade, M. J. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38, 709–719 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schluter, D. Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42, 849–861 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jakob, E. M., Marshall, S. D. & Uetz, G. W. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos 77, 61–67 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotiaho, J. S. Estimating fitness: comparison of body condition indices revisited. Oikos 87, 399–400 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkinson, G. S. & Taper, M. Evolution of genetic variation for condition-dependent traits in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1685–1690 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gil, D., Graves, J., Hazon, N. & Wells, A. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science 286, 126–128 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunningham, E. J. & Russell, A. F. Egg investment is influenced by male attractiveness in the mallard. Nature 404, 74–77 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sheldon, B. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 397–402 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hunt, J. & Simmons, L. W. Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in beetle horns: an experimental examination of the honest signalling hypothesis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 109–114 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Hunt for help during breeding of the beetles; R. Alatalo and J. Reynolds for discussions; and R. Alatalo for comments on the manuscript. J.S.K. was supported by the Academy of Finland, L.W.S. by the ARC and J.L.T. by a postdoctoral research fellowship from the University of Western Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janne S. Kotiaho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotiaho, J., Simmons, L. & Tomkins, J. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox. Nature 410, 684–686 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35070557

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35070557

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing