Abstract
Finite element analysis (FEA)1 is used by industrial designers and biomechanicists to estimate the performance of engineered structures or human skeletal and soft tissues subjected to varying regimes of stress and strain2,3,4. FEA is rarely applied to problems of biomechanical design in animals, despite its potential to inform structure–function analysis. Non-invasive techniques such as computed tomography scans can be used to generate accurate three-dimensional images of structures, such as skulls, which can form the basis of an accurate finite element model. Here we have applied this technique to the long skull of the large carnivorous theropod dinosaur Allosaurus fragilis5. We have generated the most geometrically complete and complex FEA model of the skull of any extinct or extant organism and used this to test its mechanical properties and examine, in a quantitative way, long-held hypotheses concerning overall shape and function6,7,8. The combination of a weak muscle-driven bite force, a very ‘light’ and ‘open’ skull architecture and unusually high cranial strength, suggests a very specific feeding behaviour for this animal. These results demonstrate simply the inherent potential of FEA for testing mechanical behaviour in fossils in ways that, until now, have been impossible.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zienkiewicz, O. C. in The Finite Element Method in Engineering Science 521 (McGraw-Hill, London, 1971).
Ross, C. T. F. in Finite Element Methods in Engineering Science 519 (Ellis Horwood, London, 1990).
Huiskes, R. & Chao, E. Y. S. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: The first decade. J. Biomechanics 16, 385–409 (1983).
Huiskes, R. & Hollister, S. J. From structure to process, From organ to cell: Recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. J. Biomech. Eng., Trans. ASME 115, 520–527 (1993).
Madsen, J. H. Jr Allosaurus fragilis: A Revised Osteology. Utah Geol. Min. Surv. Bull. 109, 1–163 (1976).
Paul, G. S. in Predatory Dinosaurs of The World 464 (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1988).
Farlow, J. O. Speculations about the diet and foraging behaviour of large carnivorous dinosaurs. Am. Mid. Nat. 95, 186-191 (1976a).
Farlow, J. O., Brinkman, D. L., Abler, W. L. & Currie, P. J. Size, shape, and serration density of theropod dinosaur lateral teeth. Mod. Geol. 16, 161–198 (1991).
Dodson, P., Behrensmeyer, A. K., Bakker, R. T. & McIntosh, J. S. Taphonomy and paleoecology of the dinosaur beds of the Jurassic Morrison Formation. Paleobiol. 6, 208–232 (1980).
Molnar, R. E. & Farlow, J. O. in The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmolska, H.) 210–224 (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1990).
Perez-Moreno, B. P. et al. On the presence of Allosaurus fragilis (Theropoda: Carnosauria) in the Upper Jurassic of Portugal: first evidence of an intercontinental dinosaur species. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 156, 449–452 (1999).
Erickson, G. M. et al. Bite-force estimation for Tyrannosaurus rex from tooth-marked bones. Nature 382, 706–708 (1996).
Buckland-Wright, J. C. Bone structure and the patterns of force transmission in the cat skull (Felis catus). J. Morph. 155, 35–62 (1978).
Witmer, L. M. The Evolution of the Antorbital Cavity of Archosaurs: A study in soft-tissue reconstruction in the fossil record with an analysis of the function of pneumaticity. J. Vert. Paleo. Mem. 17, 1–73 (1997).
Molnar, R. E. The cranial morphology of Tyrannosaurus rex. Palaeontographica Abr. A. 217, 137–176 (1991).
Chin, K., Tokaryk, T. T., Erickson, G. M. & Calk, L. C. A king-sized theropod coprolite. Nature 393, 680–682 (1998).
Erickson, G. M. & Olson, K. H. Bite marks attributable to Tyrannosaurus rex: preliminary description and implications. J. Vert. Paleontol. 16, 175–178 (1996).
Diamond, J. M. in Principles of Animal Design: The Optimization and Symmorphosis Debate (eds Weibel, E. R., Taylor, C. R. & Bolis, L.) 21–27 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998).
Thomason, J. J. & Russell, A. P. Mechanical factors in the evolution of the mammalian secondary palate: a theoretical analysis. J. Morph. 189, 199–213 (1986).
Auffenberg, W. The Behavioural Ecology of the Komodo Monitor. (Univ. Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida, 1981).
Sues, H. D. & Norman, D. B. in The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmolska, H.) 498–509 (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1990).
Reid, R. E. H. Bone histology of the Cleveland-Lloyd dinosaurs and of dinosaurs in general. Brig. Young Univ. Geol. Stud. 41, 25–71 (1996).
Reilly, D. T. & Burstein, A. H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech. 8, 393–405 (1975).
Waters, N. E. in The Mechanical Properties of Biological Materials (eds Vincent, J. F. V & Currey, J. D.) 99–135 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1980).
Thomason, J. J., Russell, A. P. & Morgelli, M. Forces of biting, body size, and masticatory muscle tension in the opossum Didelphis virginiana. Can. J. Zool. 68, 318–324 (1990).
Crompton, A. W. & Hylander, W. L. in The Ecology and Biology of Mammal Like Reptiles (eds Hotton, N., Maclean, P. D., Roth, J. J. & Roth, E. C.) 263–282 (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, 1986).
Sinclair, A. G. & Alexander, R. M. Estimated forces exerted by the jaw muscles of some reptiles. J. Zool. 213, 107–115 (1987).
Thomason, J. J. Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some mammals. Can. J. Zool. 69, 2326–2333 (1991).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Bozeman Hospital, Montana, USA, and Picker CT scan Company for CT scanning and file conversion; R. E. H. Reid for advice on dinosaur bone histology and material properties; and M. Harwood for COSMOS/M technical support. J. R. Horner provided access to Allosaurus fragilis (MOR 693), C. C. Horner provided use of computing equipment and aided file conversion; P. May Smith assisted with bite force calculations; S. Evans provided crocodile and alligator material for dissection and R. Felix advised on coordinate capture and image production. This work was supported by The Royal Society (D.B.N.), the Natural Environment Research Council, The Department of Earth Sciences and Emmanuel College, Cambridge University and the Cambridge Philosophical Society, and the British Federation of Women Graduates (E.J.R.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rayfield, E., Norman, D., Horner, C. et al. Cranial design and function in a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 409, 1033–1037 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35059070
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35059070
This article is cited by
-
Functional space analyses reveal the function and evolution of the most bizarre theropod manual unguals
Communications Biology (2023)
-
Divergent strategies in cranial biomechanics and feeding ecology of the ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Cranial muscle reconstructions quantify adaptation for high bite forces in Oviraptorosauria
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Digital 3D models of theropods for approaching body-mass distribution and volume
Journal of Iberian Geology (2021)
-
Bone microstructure in finite element modeling: the functional role of trabeculae in the femoral head of Sciurus vulgaris
Zoomorphology (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.