Reply

Climate change and Australian wheat yield

Article metrics

Abstract

Nicholls replies Godden et al. state that I proxied non-climate factors “by a linear trend in yields”. I did not and my conclusions were not dependent on the functional form of any relationship between non-climate factors and yield. They suggest that forcing the intercept to zero and fitting with ordinary least-squares biases my estimates. I repeated the analysis without forcing a zero intercept, with no significant effect on the results. The climate-yield change relationship is so strong (see Fig. 2 of Ref. 1) that other forms of fitting produce a result very similar to ordinary least-squares. This relationship dominates the effects of other variables and provides a way to estimate the effect of climate on yield change. Godden et al. believe that detrending with first differences is inappropriate. As I noted, repeating the analysis on residuals from fitted non-linear trends produces very similar results.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Nicholls, N. Nature 387, 484–485 (1997).

  2. 2

    Rimmington, G. M. & Nicholls, N. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 44, 625–632 (1993).

  3. 3

    Stone, R., Nicholls, N. & Hammer, G. J. Climate 9, 1896–1909 (1996).

  4. 4

    Lavery,, Joung, G. & Nicholls, N. Aust. Meteorol. Mag. 46, 27–38 (1997).

  5. 5

    Hamblin, A. and Kyneur, G. Trends in Wheat Yields and Soil Fertility in Australia (Aust. Govt. Publ. Serv., Canberra, 1993).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.