Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Science and Society
  • Published:

Human genome diversity: What about the other human genome project?

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 2, pages 222–227 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

Although the Human Genome Project has been successful, the Human Genome Diversity Project, proposed in 1991, has so far failed to thrive. One of the main values in studying the human genome, however, will come from examining its variations and their effects. To do that in a systematic way, an active Human Genome Diversity Project, or something very similar, will ultimately prove vital. Such an effort will confront difficult ethical and political issues; this article reviews those issues and tries to show how they might be overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Bhil women in the Thar desert, India.

References

  1. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Wilson, A. C., Cantor, C. R., Cook-Deegan, R. M. & King, M. C. Call for a world-wide survey of human genetic diversity: a vanishing opportunity for the human genome project. Genomics 11, 490– 491 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Human Genome Diversity Committee of HUGO Human Genome Diversity (HGD) Project, Summary Document (HUGO Europe, London, 1995). Also available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/hgdp/summary93.html .

  3. Cook-Deegan, R. M. Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome (W. W. Norton & Co., New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).

  5. Hirschfeld, L. & Hirschfeld, L. Serological differences between the blood of different races: the results of researches on the Macedonian front. Lancet II, 675–695 (1919).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider, W. H. The history of research on blood group genetics: initial discovery and diffusion . Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 18, 7– 33 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Menozzi, P. & Piazza, A. History and Geography of Human Genes. (Princeton Univ. Press, New Jersey, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marks, J. The Human Genome Diversity Project. Anthropol. News 72 (April 1995).

  9. Lock, M. Interrogating the Human Genome Variation Project. Soc. Sci. Med. 39, 603–606 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. (US) National Bioethics Advisory Commission The Use of Human Biological Materials in Research (National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Bethesda, Maryland, 1999).

  11. North American Regional Committee of the Human Genome Diversity Project. Proposed model ethical protocol for collecting DNA samples. Houston Law Rev. 33, 1431– 1473 (1997). Also available at http://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/hgdp/protocol.html .

  12. Rural Advancement Foundation International Patents, indigenous peoples, and human genetic diversity. RAFI Communiqué (May 1993). Also available at the Rural Advancement Foundation International home page, http://rafi.org.

  13. Declaration of Indigenous Peoples of the Western Hemisphere Regarding the Human Genome Diversity Project. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 50 (Summer 1996). Also available at http://www.ipcb.org/resolutions/phxdecla.html .

  14. Harry, D. The Human Genome Diversity Project. Abya Yala News 8, 8 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Armstrong, J. Global trade targets indigenous gene lines. Natl Catholic Rep. 27 (January 11–12, 1995).

  16. Mead, A. T. P. Genealogy, sacredness and the commodities market. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 46–49 ( 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liloqula, R. Value of life: saving genes versus saving indigenous peoples. Cultural Survival Quart. 20, 42–45 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. HUGO Ethics Committee Genetic benefit sharing. Science 290, 49 (2000).

  19. Pennisi, E. NRC OKs long delayed survey of human genome diversity. Science 278, 568 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. MacIlwain, C. Diversity project 'does not merit federal funding'. Nature 389, 774 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Support for genetic diversity project. Nature 390, 221 (1997).

  22. Schull, W. J. Genetic diversity survey. Science 279, 10 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schull, W. J. Support for genetic diversity project. Nature 390, 221 (1997).

  24. Smaglik, P. Genetic diversity project fights for its life. Nature 404, 912 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Marshall, E. Drug firms to create public database of genetic mutations. Science 284, 406–407 ( 1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Collins, F. S., Brooks, L. D. & Chakravarti, A. A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation. Genome Res. 8, 1229–1231 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Greely, H. T. Iceland's plan for genomics research: facts and implications. Jurimetrics 40, 153–191 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frank, L. Estonia prepares for national DNA database. Science 290, 31 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Greenwood, J. The business of genes: Newfoundland hopes to reap the benefits after its genetic heritage has helped decode the human genome. Natl Post D1 (June 24, 2000).

  30. Hagmann, M. Epidemiology. U.K. plans major medical DNA database. Science 287, 1184 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolata, G. Boston U. founds company to sift landmark heart data. New York Times A9 (June 17, 2000).

  32. Barkham, P. Faraway Tonga cashes in on its gene pool secrets. Guardian (Lond.) 20 (November 23, 2000 )

  33. Greely, H. T. in Human DNA Sampling: Law and Policy — International and Comparative Perspectives (ed. Knoppers, B. M.) 239–256 (Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  34. National Research Council Evaluating Human Genetic Diversity. (National Academy, Washington, DC, 1997).

  35. Juengst, E. T. Group identity and human diversity: keeping biology straight from culture . Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 673– 677 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Juengst, E. T. Groups as gatekeepers to genomic research: conceptually confusing, morally hazardous, and practically useless. Kennedy Inst. Ethics J. 8, 183–200 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reilly, P. R. Rethinking risks to human subjects in genetic research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 682–685 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Reilly, P. R. & Page, D. C. We're off to see the genome. Nature Genet. 20, 15–17 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Greely, H. T. The control of genetic research: involving the groups between. Houston Law Rev. 33, 1397–1430 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Freeman, W. L. in Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Policy Implications (ed. Weir, R. F.) 267–301 (Univ. Iowa Press, Iowa City, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Foster, M. W. et al. The role of community review in evaluating the collective risks of human genetic variation research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 1719–1727 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Foster, M. W. & Sharp, R. R. Involving study populations in the review of genetic research. J. Law Med. Ethics 28, 41–51 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Foster, M. W., Bernsten, D. & Carter, T. H. A model agreement for genetic research in socially identifiable populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 696–702 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weijer, C., Goldsand, G. & Emanuel, E. J. Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation. Nature Genet. 23, 275–280 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Roberts, L. How to sample the world's genetic diversity. Science 257, 1204–1205 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Roberts, L. Anthropologists climb gingerly on board. Science 258 , 1300–1301 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Knoppers, B. M., Hirtle, M., Lormeau, S., Laberge, C. M. & Laflamme, M. Control of DNA samples and information. Genomics 50, 385–401 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. UNESCO, International Bioethics Committee, Subcommittee on Bioethics and Population Genetics Bioethics and Human Population Genetics Research (UNESCO, Paris, November 15, 1995). Also available at http://zobell.biol.tsukuba.ac.jp/~macer/PG.html

  49. Macer, D. R. J., Fleming, J., Keyeux, G. & Knoppers, B. M. UNESCO and population genetics. Nature 379, 11 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Stanford Law School, Stanford, 94305-8610, California, USA

    Henry T. Greely

Authors
  1. Henry T. Greely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

DATABASE LINKS

Huntington disease

cystic fibrosis

sickle cell anaemia

FURTHER INFORMATION

Human Genome Organization

US National Bioethics Advisory Commission

National Institutes of Health

Department of Energy

National Science Foundation

US National Research Council

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Discovery Resource at the Coriell Institute

National Institute of General Medical Sciences Human Genetic Cell Repository

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Centre pour l'Etude du Polymorphism Humaine

Henry Greely's home page

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greely, H. Human genome diversity: What about the other human genome project?. Nat Rev Genet 2, 222–227 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35056071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35056071

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing