Letter | Published:

Role for sperm in spatial patterning of the early mouse embryo

Nature volume 409, pages 517521 (25 January 2001) | Download Citation



Despite an apparent lack of determinants that specify cell fate, spatial patterning of the mouse embryo is evident early in development. The axis of the post-implantation egg cylinder can be traced back to organization of the pre-implantation blastocyst1. This in turn reflects the organization of the cleavage-stage embryo and the animal–vegetal axis of the zygote2,3. These findings suggest that the cleavage pattern of normal development may be involved in specifying the future embryonic axis; however, how and when this pattern becomes established is unclear. In many animal eggs, the sperm entry position provides a cue for embryonic patterning4,5,6, but until now no such role has been found in mammals. Here we show that the sperm entry position predicts the plane of initial cleavage of the mouse egg and can define embryonic and abembryonic halves of the future blastocyst. In addition, the cell inheriting the sperm entry position acquires a division advantage and tends to cleave ahead of its sister. As cell identity reflects the timing of the early cleavages, these events together shape the blastocyst whose organization will become translated into axial patterning after implantation. We present a model for axial development that accommodates these findings with the regulative nature of mouse embryos.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , , & Polarity of the mouse embryo is anticipated before implantation. Development 126 , 5591–5598 (1999).

  2. 2.

    , & Animal and vegetal poles of the mouse egg predict the polarity of the embryonic axis, yet are non-essential for development. Development 127, 3467–3474 (2000).

  3. 3.

    The early blastocyst is bilaterally symmetrical and its axis of symmetry is aligned with the animal–vegetal axis of the zygote in the mouse. Development 124, 289–301 (1997).

  4. 4.

    & Specification of the anteroposterior axis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 122, 1467–1474 (1996).

  5. 5.

    in Cell Lineage and Fate Determination (ed. Moody, S. A.) 97– 117 (Academic, San Diego, 1999).

  6. 6.

    et al. Cortical rotation of the Xenopus egg: consequences for the anteroposterior pattern of embryonic dorsal development. Development 107, 37–51 ( 1989).

  7. 7.

    & Features of cell lineage in preimplantation mouse development. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 48 , 53–72 (1978).

  8. 8.

    , & Cell division and cell allocation in early mouse development. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 48, 37–51 (1978).

  9. 9.

    & Development of blastomeres of mouse eggs isolated at the 4- and 8-cell stage. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 18, 155– 180 (1967).

  10. 10.

    Postimplantation development of blastomeres isolated from 4- and 8-cell mouse eggs. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 36, 283–290 (1976).

  11. 11.

    & Allocation of cells to inner cell mass and trophectoderm lineages in preimplantation mouse embryos. Dev. Biol. 23, 52–62 ( 1982).

  12. 12.

    & Spatial distribution of blastomeres is dependent on cell division order and interactions in mouse morulae. Dev. Biol. 102, 335–343 (1984).

  13. 13.

    , & When and how does cell division order influence cell allocation to the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst? Development 100, 325–332 ( 1987).

  14. 14.

    & Formation and consequences of cell patterns in preimplantation mouse development. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 49, 277–294 ( 1979).

  15. 15.

    , & The establishment of the embryonic–abembryonic axis in the mouse embryo. Development 100, 125–134 (1987).

  16. 16.

    Interaction between inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. II. The fate of the polar trophectoderm. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 51, 109–120 ( 1979).

  17. 17.

    & Cell fate in the polar trophectoderm of mouse blastocysts as studied by microinjection of cell lineage tracers. Dev. Biol. 112, 73–83 (1985).

  18. 18.

    Clonal analysis of growth of the polar trophectoderm in the mouse. Hum. Reprod. 11, 1979–1984 (1996).

  19. 19.

    Fertile offspring derived from mammalian eggs lacking either animal or vegetal poles. Development 125, 4803– 4808 (1998).

Download references


We are grateful to D. Glover for invaluable suggestions and support; R. Pedersen and C. Graham for helpful discussions; and J. Gurdon for his critical comments. This work was supported by a Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine Fellowship, a Wellcome Trust Project Grant and a Royal Society Equipment Grant to M.Z.-G.

Author information


  1. Wellcome/CRC Institute and Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, UK

    • Karolina Piotrowska
    •  & Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz


  1. Search for Karolina Piotrowska in:

  2. Search for Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.