Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals

Nature Reviews Genetics volume 2, pages 130–138 (2001)Cite this article

Key Points

  • Farm animals provide unique resources for studying genotype–phenotype relationships of a variety of traits due to the rich genetic diversity within and between breeds.

  • Farm animals were domesticated from their wild ancestors 5,000–15,000 years ago. In several cases, independent domestication from two or more subspecies took place.

  • Genome research in farm animals focuses primarily on non-pathological phenotypes. Thus, the search for mutations modifying phenotypes predominates over the search for mutations with clear pathological consequences.

  • Genetic studies of phenotypic traits, including multifactorial traits, are facilitated by the extensive pedigrees and the long tradition of collecting phenotype information in animal breeding programmes. Furthermore, resource populations for gene mapping can be generated by intercrossing different populations of farm animals.

  • All the basic resources for genome research are in place for the major farm animals, such as large collections of genetic markers (primarily microsatellites), large-insert libraries and radiation hybrid panels. However, the number of ESTs, as well as the number of cloned genes, are low compared with human and mouse.

  • Comparative gene mapping has been a key activity in farm animal genomics to allow access to the more developed genetic maps in other vertebrates. Comparative gene mapping has shown that the organization of the human genome is closer to that of farm animals (including chicken) than to the mouse.

  • The chromosomal localization of trait loci is determined by genome scans. Positional candidate cloning is the main strategy for the molecular identification of trait loci.

  • Linkage disequilibrium mapping seems to be a promising strategy for high-resolution mapping of trait loci as linkage disequilibrium occurs more frequently in farm animal populations than in human populations.

  • Several genes causing monogenic disorders and muscle development have already been identified. Diagnostic DNA tests for these are currently used in practical animal breeding.

  • Genome research in farm animals will lead to important practical applications in the farm animal industry but will also give new basic knowledge of the genetic basis for a variety of phenotypic traits of agricultural, biological and medical significance.

Abstract

Farm animal populations harbour rich collections of mutations with phenotypic effects that have been purposefully enriched by breeding. Most of these mutations do not have pathological phenotypic consequences, in contrast to the collections of deleterious mutations in model organisms or those causing inherited disorders in humans. Farm animals are of particular interest for identifying genes that control growth, energy metabolism, development, appetite, reproduction and behaviour, as well as other traits that have been manipulated by breeding. Genome research in farm animals will add to our basic understanding of the genetic control of these traits and the results will be applied in breeding programmes to reduce the incidence of disease and to improve product quality and production efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Phenotypic diversity of domestic animals.
Figure 2: Conserved genome organization among vertebrates.
Figure 3: Half-sib families and breeding value.
Figure 4: The use of intercrosses between divergent populations.
Figure 5: Double-muscling in cattle.

References

  1. Harpending, H. C. et al. Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1961–1967 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Loftus, R. T., MacHugh, D. E., Bradley, D. G., Sharp, P. M. & Cunningham, P. Evidence for two independent domestications of cattle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 2757–2761 (1994).A demonstration that cattle have been domesticated from two distinct subspecies and that many breeds of African cattle are hybrids between the two owing to male-derived gene flow.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. MacHugh, D. E., Shriver, M. D., Loftus, R. T., Cunningham, P. & Bradley, D. G. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics 146, 1071–1086 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuffra, E. et al. The origin of the domestic pig: independent domestication and subsequent introgression. Genetics 154, 1785–1791 (2000).Evidence is presented for independent domestication of Wild Boar subspecies in Europe and Asia.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Darwin, C. On the origins of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life (Murray, London, 1859).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hawken, R. J. et al. A first-generation porcine whole-genome radiation hybrid map. Mamm. Genome 10, 824–830 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Y. P. & Womack, J. E. Parallel radiation hybrid mapping: a powerful tool for high-resolution genomic comparison. Genome Res. 8, 731–736 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwok, C. et al. Characterization of whole genome radiation hybrid mapping resources for non-mammalian vertebrates. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 3562–3566 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Band, M. R. et al. An ordered comparative map of the cattle and human genomes. Genome Res. 10, 1359–1368 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lockhart, D. J. & Winzeler, E. A. Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays. Nature 405, 827–836 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chowdhary, B. P., Raudsepp, T., Fronicke, L. & Scherthan, H. Emerging patterns of comparative genome organization in some mammalian species as revealed by Zoo-FISH. Genome Res. 8, 577–589 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Burt, D. W. et al. The dynamics of chromosome evolution in birds and mammals. Nature 402, 411–413 (1999).The analysis of comparative mapping data shows that the organization of the human genome is closer to that of the chicken than the mouse. This illustrates that the rate of chromosomal evolution varies considerably between species.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bush, G. L., Case, S. M., Wilson, A. C. & Patton, J. L. Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 74, 3942–3946 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson, M., Ellegren, H. & Andersson, L. Comparative mapping reveals extensive linkage conservation—but with gene order rearrangements—between the pig and the human genomes. Genomics 25, 682–690 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Georges, M. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling milk production in dairy cattle by exploiting progeny testing. Genetics 139, 907–920 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Q. et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for milk production and health of dairy cattle in a large outbred pedigree. Genetics 149, 1959–1973 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Heyen, D. W. et al. A genome scan for QTL influencing milk production and health traits in dairy cattle. Physiol. Genomics 1, 165–175 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlier, C. et al. Identity-by-descent mapping of recessive traits in livestock: application to map the bovine syndactyly locus to chromosome 15. Genome Res. 6, 580–589 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Riquet, J. et al. Fine-mapping of quantitative trait loci by identity by descent in outbred populations: application to milk production in dairy cattle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 9252–9257 (1999).This paper shows how the identity-by-descent approach can be applied to high-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci in farm animals by using extensive pedigree information.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Farnir, F. et al. Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res. 10, 220–227 (2000).The pattern of linkage disequilibrium (LD) across the genome in dairy cattle is evaluated. The strong LD detected holds promise that LD mapping will be a powerful strategy for mapping quantitative trait loci in farm animals.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Andersson, L. et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth and fatness in pigs. Science 263, 1771–1774 (1994).The first paper to show the use of divergent intercrosses for mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred populations.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohrer, G. A. & Keele, J. W. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting carcass composition in swine: I. Fat deposition traits. J. Anim. Sci. 76, 2247–2254 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Koning, D. J. et al. Detection of quantitative trait loci for backfat thickness and intramuscular fat content in pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics 152, 1679–1690 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Brenneman, R. A. et al. The polled locus maps to BTA1 in a Bos indicus x Bos taurus cross. J. Hered. 87, 156–161 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walling, G. A. et al. Combined analyses of data from quantitative trait loci mapping studies. Chromosome 4 effects on porcine growth and fatness. Genetics 155, 1369–1378 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Darvasi, A. & Soller, M. Advanced intercross lines, an experimental population for fine genetic-mapping. Genetics 141, 1199–1207 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Darvasi, A. Experimental strategies for the genetic dissection of complex traits in animal models. Nature Genet. 18, 19–24 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Milan, D. et al. A mutation in PRKAG3 associated with excess glycogen content in pig skeletal muscle. Science 288, 1248–1251 (2000).The first positional cloning of a trait locus in a farm animal. Linkage mapping, linkage disequilibrium mapping, radiation hybrid mapping, construction of a BAC contig, BAC sequencing and bioinformatic analysis eventually resulted in the identification of the causative missense mutation.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schibler, L., Cribiu, E. P., Oustry-Vaiman, A., Furet, J. P. & Vaiman, D. Fine mapping suggests that the goat Polled Intersex Syndrome and the human Blepharophimosis Ptosis Epicanthus Syndrome map to a 100-kb homologous region. Genome Res. 10, 311–318 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mackay, T. F. C. Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 11–21 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Robbins, L. S. et al. Pigmentation phenotypes of variant extension locus alleles result from point mutations that alter MSH receptor function. Cell 72, 827–834 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klungland, H., Vage, D. I., Gomez-Raya, L., Adalsteinsson, S. & Lien, S. The role of melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH) receptor in bovine coat color determination. Mamm. Genome 6, 636–639 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marklund, L., Moller, M. J., Sandberg, K. & Andersson, L. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses. Mamm. Genome 7, 895–899 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kijas, J. M. H. et al. Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat color in pigs. Genetics 150, 1177–1185 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Vage, D. I., Klungland, H., Lu, D. & Cone, R. D. Molecular and pharmacological characterization of dominant black coat color in sheep. Mamm. Genome 10, 39–43 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Newton, J. M. et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor variation in the domestic dog. Mamm. Genome 11, 24–30 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takeuchi, S., Suzuki, H., Yabuuchi, M. & Takahashi, S. A possible involvement of melanocortin 1-receptor in regulating feather color pigmentation in the chicken. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1308, 164–168 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Johansson Moller, M. et al. Pigs with the dominant white coat color phenotype carry a duplication of the KIT gene encoding the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor. Mamm. Genome 7, 822–830 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marklund, S. et al. Molecular basis for the dominant white phenotype in the domestic pig. Genome Res. 8, 826–833 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Fujii, J. et al. Identification of a mutation in the porcine ryanodine receptor that is associated with malignant hyperthermia. Science 253, 448–451 (1991).The first molecular description of a major trait locus in farm animals.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. MacLennan, D. H. & Phillips, M. S. Malignant hyperthermia. Science 256, 789–794 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jeon, J. -T. et al. A paternally expressed QTL affecting skeletal and cardiac muscle mass in pigs maps to the IGF2 locus. Nature Genet. 21, 157–158 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nezer, C. et al. An imprinted QTL with major effect on muscle mass and fat deposition maps to the IGF2 locus in pigs. Nature Genet. 21, 155–156 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Charlier, C. et al. The mh gene causing double-muscling in cattle maps to bovine chromosome 2. Mamm. Genome 6, 788–792 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McPherron, A. C., Lawler, A. M. & Lee, S. J. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-β superfamily member. Nature 387, 83–90 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grobet, L. et al. A deletion in the bovine myostatin gene causes the double-muscled phenotype in cattle. Nature Genet. 17, 71–74 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kambadur, R., Sharma, M., Smith, T. P. & Bass, J. J. Mutations in myostatin (GDF8) in double-muscled Belgian Blue and Piedmontese cattle. Genome Res. 7, 910–916 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McPherron, A. C. & Lee, S. J. Double muscling in cattle due to mutations in the myostatin gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12457–12461 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Grobet, L. et al. Molecular definition of an allelic series of mutations disrupting the myostatin function and causing double-muscling in cattle. Mamm. Genome 9, 210–213 (1998).References 46 – 49 show that selection for muscularity in beef cattle has increased the frequency of at least five independent loss-of-function mutations in myostatin.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cockett, N. E. et al. Chromosomal localization of the callipyge gene in sheep (Ovis aries) using bovine DNA markers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 3019–3023 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Cockett, N. E. et al. Polar overdominance at the ovine callipyge locus. Science 273, 236–238 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. de Koning, D. J. et al. Genome-wide scan for body composition in pigs reveals important role of imprinting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7947–7950 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Reik, W. & Walter, J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 21–32 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Galloway, S. M. et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nature Genet. 25, 279–283 (2000).Positional candidate cloning revealed two different causative mutations in BMP15 affecting fertility in sheep.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Montgomery, G. W. et al. The Booroola fecundity (FecB) gene maps to sheep chromosome 6. Genomics 22, 148–153 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rothschild, M. et al. The estrogen receptor locus is associated with a major gene influencing litter size in pigs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 201–205 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rohrer, G. A., Ford, J. J., Wise, T. H., Vallet, J. L. & Christenson, R. K. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting female reproductive traits in a multigeneration Meishan-White composite swine population. J. Anim. Sci. 77, 1385–1391 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilkie, P. J. et al. A genomic scan of porcine reproductive traits reveals possible quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for number of corpora lutea. Mamm. Genome 10, 573–578 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shuster, D. E., Kehrli, M. E., Ackermann, M. R. & Gilbert, R. O. Identification and prevalence of a genetic defect that causes leukocyte adhesion deficiency in Holstein cattle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 9225–9229 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Shin, E. K., Perryman, L. E. & Meek, K. A kinase-negative mutation of DNA-PKCS in equine SCID results in defective coding and signal joint formation. J. Immunol. 158, 3565–3569 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin, L. et al. The sleep disorder canine narcolepsy is caused by a mutation in the hypocretin (orexin) receptor 2 gene. Cell 98, 365–376 (1999).This paper shows how a well-established animal model for a human disorder was used to identify an autosomal recessive mutation responsible for the disorder.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schook, L. B. & Lamont, S. J. The major histocomaptibility complex region of domestic animal species (CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Teale, A. et al. Genetics of resistance to trypanosomiasis in mice and livestock. Anim. Genet. (Suppl. 2) 27, 5 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Meijerink, E. et al. Two α (1,2) fucosyltransferase genes on porcine chromosome 6q11 are closely linked to the blood group inhibitor (S) and Escherichia coli F18 receptor (ECF18R) loci. Mamm. Genome 8, 736–741 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Edfors-Lilja, I. et al. The porcine intestinal receptor for Escherichia coli K88ab, K88ac: regional localization on chromosome 13 and influence of IgG response to the K88 antigen Anim. Genet. 26, 237–242 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vallejo, R. L. et al. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting susceptibility to Marek's disease virus induced tumors in F2 intercross chickens. Genetics 148, 349–360 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kao, C.-H., Zeng, Z.-B. & Teasdale, R. Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 152, 1203–1216 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Carlborg, Ö., Andersson, L. & Kinghorn, B. The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci. Genetics 155, 2003–2010 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Geldermann, H. Investigations of quantitative characters in animals by gene markers. I. Methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 46, 319–330 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Weller, J., Kashi, Y. & Soller, M. Power of daughter and granddaughter designs for determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 2525–2537 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Seitz, J. J., Schmutz, S. M., Thue, T. D. & Buchanan, F. C. A missense mutation in the bovine MGF gene is associated with the roan phenotype in Belgian Blue and Shorthorn cattle. Mamm. Genome 10, 710–712 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks are due to Erik Bongcam-Rudloff for expert assistance in preparing the illustrations. Work in the author's laboratory is primarily supported by the Swedish Research Council for Forestry and Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 597, Uppsala, S-751 24, Sweden

    Leif Andersson

Authors
  1. Leif Andersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

DATABASE LINKS

Mc1r

KIT

dominant white coat colour in pigs

dominant white spotting in mice

piebald trait in humans

malignant hyperthermia in pigs

malignant hyperthermia in humans

myostatin

bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency

severe combined immunodeficiency in Arabian horses

narcolepsy in dogs

oedema disease in pigs

FURTHER INFORMATION

Roslin Institute

US Livestock Genome Mapping Projects

Human SNP Consortium

pig radiation hybrid maps

human transcript map

US Meat Animal Research Center

Online Mendelian Inheritance In Animals

dbEST summary by organism

Glossary

PURIFYING SELECTION

Selection against a deleterious allele.

CHROMOSOME PAINTING

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to chromosomes using a probe that represents a whole chromosome or a part of a chromosome.

BREEDING VALUE

The genetic merit of an individual estimated using the phenotypic deviation of its offspring from the population mean.

GENETIC DRIFT

The random fluctuation in allele frequencies as genes are transmitted from one generation to the next.

POPULATION STRATIFICATION

The population is divided into sub-populations. In farm animals, it is very common that some breeding animals are used more frequently in some herds than in others. This generates allele frequency differences between sub-populations and linkage disequilibrium in the population.

ZOO-FISH

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) of a chromosome-specific probe from one species to chromosomes from another species.

ADVANCED INTERCROSS LINES (AIL).

Subsequent generations (F3, F4 and so on) of an intercross pedigree, maintained to allow high-resolution mapping of trait loci.

RESOURCE POPULATION

A population generated for particular research purposes, such as an intercross between two divergent breeds of farm animal or a population containing particularly interesting phenotypic data.

INTROGRESSION

Transfer of genetic material from one population to another by repeated backcrossing.

GERM PLASM

The physical basis of heredity, and therefore the genetic material used for breeding.

MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION

The use of genetic markers to predict the inheritance of alleles at a closely linked trait locus.

INTERSEXES

Individuals that have a mixture of male and female characters.

FIMBRIATED

Fimbria are protein molecules (often called adhesins or colonizing factors) that allow the bacteria to adhere to receptors on host cells, such as enterocytes in the intestine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, L. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nat Rev Genet 2, 130–138 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35052563

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35052563

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing