Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The relationship between fragility, configurational entropy and the potential energy landscape of glass-forming liquids

Nature volume 409, pages 164–167 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

Glass is a microscopically disordered, solid form of matter that results when a fluid is cooled or compressed in such a manner that it does not crystallize. Almost all types of materials are capable of glass formation, including polymers, metal alloys and molten salts. Given such diversity, general principles by which different glass-forming materials can be systematically classified are invaluable. One such principle is the classification of glass-formers according to their fragility1. Fragility measures the rapidity with which a liquid's properties (such as viscosity) change as the glassy state is approached. Although the relationship between the fragility, configurational entropy and features of the energy landscape (the complicated dependence of energy on configuration) of a glass-former have been analysed previously2, a detailed understanding of the origins of fragility is lacking. Here I use simulations to analyse the relationship between fragility and quantitative measures of the energy landscape for a model liquid whose fragility depends on its bulk density. The results reveal that fragility depends on changes in the vibrational properties of individual energy minima in addition to their total number and spread in energy. A thermodynamic expression for fragility is derived, which is in quantitative agreement with kinetic fragilities obtained from the liquid's diffusivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Fragility plot of diffusivities, and kinetic and thermodynamic fragility indices.
Figure 2: Adam–Gibbs plot of configurational entropy versus temperature.
Figure 3: Distribution of energy minima, basin entropy and temperature dependence of inherent structure energies.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Angell, C. A. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals—Strong/fragile patterns and problems. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 131–133 , 13–31 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Speedy, R. J. Relations between a liquid and its glasses. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 4060–4065 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laughlin, W. T. & Uhlmann, D. R. Viscous flow in simple organic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. 76, 2317–2325 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adam, G. & Gibbs, J. H. On the temperature dependence of cooperative relaxation properties in glass-forming liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 43, 139–146 (1965).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Angell, C. A. Entropy and fragility in supercooled liquids. J. Res. NIST 102, 171–185 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kob, W. & Andersen, H. C. Testing mode-coupling theory for a supercooled binary Lennard–Jones mixture: The van Hove correlation function. Phys. Rev. E 51, 4626– 2641 (1995).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sastry, S., Debenedetti, P. G. & Stillinger, F. H. Signatures of distinct dynamical regimes in the energy landscape of a glass-forming liquid. Nature 393, 554–557 (1998).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sciortino, F., Kob, W. & Tartaglia, P. Inherent structure entropy of supercooled liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3214–3217 (1999).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coluzzi, B., Parisi, G. & Verrocchio, P. Lennard–Jones binary mixture: a thermodynamical approach to glass transition. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2933–2944 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sastry, S. Liquid limits: The glass transition and liquid–gas spinodal boundaries of metastable liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 590–5593 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, K., Moynihan, C. T. & Angell, C. A. Thermodynamic determination of fragility in liquids and a fragile-to-strong liquid transition in water. Nature 398, 492–495 (1999).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia, X. & Wolynes, P. G. Fragilities of liquids predicted from the random first order transition theory of glasses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2990–2994 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stillinger, F. H. & Weber, T. A. Packing structures and transitions in liquids and solids. Science 225, 983–989 (1984).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stillinger, F. H. A topographic view of supercooled liquids and glass formation. Science 267, 1935–1939 ( 1995).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buechner, S. & Heuer, A. The potential energy landscape of a model glass former: thermodynamics, anharmonicities, and finite size effects. Phys. Rev. E 60, 6507– 6518 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Speedy, R. J. The hard sphere glass transition. Mol. Phys. 95, 169–178 (1998).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Scala, A., Starr, F. W., La Nave, E., Sciortino, F. & Stanley, H. E. Configurational entropy and diffusivity of supercooled water. Nature 406, 166– 169 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sastry, S. Evaluation of configurational entropy of a model liquid from computer simulations. Proceedings of Unifying Concepts in Glass Physics, Triest, 1999. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 12, 6515–6524 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Speedy, R. J. & Debenedetti, P. G. The distribution of tetravalent network glasses. Mol. Phys. 88, 1293– 1316 (1996).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein, M. Viscous liquids and the glass transition. V. Sources of the excess specific heat of the liquid. J. Chem. Phys. 64, 4767 –4774 (1976).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Angell, C. A. & Rao, K. J. Configurational excitations in condensed matter and the bond lattice model for the liquid-glass transition. J. Chem. Phys. 57, 470–481 (1972).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Angell, C. A. Ten questions on glassformers, and a real space “excitations” model with some answers on fragility and phase transitions. Proceedings of Unifying Concepts in Glass Physics, Trieste, 1999. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 12, 6463–6476 ( 2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Green, J. L., Ito, K., Xu, K. & Angell, C. A. Fragility in liquids and polymers: new, simple quantifications and interpretations. J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 3991–3996 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johari, G. P. A resolution for the enigma of a liquid's configurational entropy–molecular kinetics relation. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8958 –8969 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Johari, G. P. Contributions to the entropy of a glass and liquid, and the dielectric relaxation time. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 7518– 7523 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamamuro, O. et al. Calorimetric study of glassy and liquid toluene and ethylbenzene: thermodynamic approach to spatial heterogeneity in glass-forming molecular liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 1605– 1609 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ngai, K. L. & Yamamuro, O. Thermodynamic fragility and kinetic fragility in supercooled liquids: A missing link in molecular liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 10403–10406 (1999).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sciortino, F. & Tartaglia, P. Extension of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem to the physical aging of a model glass-forming liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. (in the press).

  29. Starr, F. W. et al. Thermodynamic and structural aspects of the potential energy surface of simulated water. Preprint http://arXiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007487.

  30. Heuer, A. & Buechner, S. Why is the density of inherent structures of a Lennard-Jones type system gaussian? Proceedings of Unifying Concepts in Glass Physics, Trieste, 1999. J. Phys. Cond. Mat. 12, 6535–6543 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank C. A. Angell, G. P. Johari, K. J. Rao, F. Sciortino, R. Seshadri, R. J. Speedy and U. V. Waghmare for useful discussions and/or comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur Campus, Bangalore, 560064, India

    Srikanth Sastry

Authors
  1. Srikanth Sastry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srikanth Sastry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sastry, S. The relationship between fragility, configurational entropy and the potential energy landscape of glass-forming liquids. Nature 409, 164–167 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35051524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35051524

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing