Letter | Published:

The viceroy butterfly is not a batesian mimic

Nature volume 350, pages 497498 (11 April 1991) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

DEFENSIVE mimicry has long been a paradigm of adaptive evolution by natural selection1–3. Mimics, models and predators in a batesian mimicry system (unpalatable model, palatable mimic) exist in a very different selective milieu from those in a müllerian system (involving 2 unpalatable 'co-models')1,4–6. Consequently, the incorrect characterization of a mimicry relationship obscures the natural histories of populations involved and undermines attempts to test general mimicry theory by means of empirical studies of specific systems. Here, we reassess the classic case of mimicry involving viceroy butterflies, Limenitis archippus (Cramer) (Nymphalidae), and two species they purportedly mimic: the monarch, Danaus plexippus (L.), and the queen, Danaus gilippus (Cramer) (Nymphalidae: Danainae). Viceroys are historically considered palatable (batesian) mimics7,8 of the chemically defended9 danaines. Our experiment refutes this interpretation by revealing that viceroys are as unpalatable as monarchs, and significantly more unpalatable than queens from representative Florida populations. This implies that viceroys are müllerian co-mimics of the danaines and prompts a comprehensive reassessment of this widely cited exemplar of mimicry.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Ecol. Ent. 12, 81–95 (1987).

  2. 2.

    Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 16, 33–40 (1981).

  3. 3.

    Am. Nat. 131 (suppl.), 1–3 (1988).

  4. 4.

    Ecological Genetics (Methuen, London, 1971).

  5. 5.

    Symb. Bot. Uppsal. 22, 82–99 (1979).

  6. 6.

    Am. Nat. 131, S22–S41 (1988).

  7. 7.

    & Am. Ent. 1, 189–193 (1869).

  8. 8.

    Nature 3, 147 (1970).

  9. 9.

    in The Biology of Butterflies (eds Vane-Wright, R. I. & Ackery, P. R.) 109–135 (Symp. Roy. Ent. Soc. No. 11).

  10. 10.

    J. chem. Ecol. 11, 85–103 (1985).

  11. 11.

    , & J. chem. Ecol. 15, 819–854 (1989).

  12. 12.

    thesis, Univ. of Florida (1989).

  13. 13.

    , , , & Experientia 43, 943–946 (1987).

  14. 14.

    Evolution 12, 32–47 (1958).

  15. 15.

    Evolution 12, 273–285 (1958).

  16. 16.

    , & Evolution 25, 692–701 (1971).

  17. 17.

    Environ. Ent. 4, 455–473 (1975).

  18. 18.

    Life Histories of North American Blackbirds, Orioles, Tanagers, and Allies (Dover New York, 1965).

  19. 19.

    & Nat. Hist. 71, 8–19 (1962).

  20. 21.

    & Milkweed Butterflies: Their Cladistics and Biology (Cornell Univ. Press, New York, 1984).

  21. 22.

    Guide to the Vascular Plants of Central Florida (University Presses of Florida Tampa, 1982).

  22. 23.

    , & Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 23, 247–268 (1984).

  23. 24.

    Evolution 30, 86–93 (1976).

  24. 25.

    Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 297–308 (1976).

  25. 26.

    , , , & Ecol. Ent. 4, 83–93 (1979).

  26. 27.

    & Ecol. Monogr. 59, 433–463 (1989).

  27. 29.

    , & Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 28, 359–372 (1986).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA

    • David B. Ritland
    •  & Lincoln P. Brower

Authors

  1. Search for David B. Ritland in:

  2. Search for Lincoln P. Brower in:

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/350497a0

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.