The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation

The germline mutation rate in human males, especially older males, is generally much higher than in females, mainly because in males there are many more germ-cell divisions. However, there are some exceptions and many variations. Base substitutions, insertion–deletions, repeat expansions and chromosomal changes each follow different rules. Evidence from evolutionary sequence data indicates that the overall rate of deleterious mutation may be high enough to have a large effect on human well-being. But there are ways in which the impact of deleterious mutations can be mitigated.

Key Points

  • Germline base substitution mutations occur more frequently in males than in females, especially in older males.

  • The main explanation for the sex and age effect is that a much larger number of germline divisions occurs in the male than in the female, and continues throughout male adulthood.

  • Point mutations at some loci occur almost exclusively in males, whereas others have a smaller excess, roughly ten times more than in females. Which is more typical remains to be determined.

  • For mutations other than point mutations, sex biases in the mutation rate are very variable. However, small deletions are more frequent in females.

  • The total rate of new deleterious mutations for all genes is estimated to be about three per zygote. This value is uncertain, but it is likely that the number is greater than one.

  • It is suggested that quasi-truncation selection is the principal explanation for how the population can rid itself of a large number of mutations with a relatively low fitness cost.

  • Since this form of selection is effective only with sexual reproduction, perhaps the fact that humans reproduce sexually has made it possible to have such a long life cycle.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Wilhelm Weinberg.
Figure 2: Cell divisions during oogenesis and spermatogenesis.
Figure 3: Relative frequency of de novo achondroplasia and Apert syndrome for different paternal ages.
Figure 4: Relative frequency of de novo neurofibromatosis for different paternal ages.
Figure 5: Relative frequency of all trisomies for different maternal ages.

References

  1. 1

    Weinberg, W. Zur Vererbung des Zwergwuchses. Arch. Rassen- u. Gesel. Biolog. 9, 710–718 ( 1912).In this paper, Weinberg first noted the importance of birth order, which led to the idea of the paternal age effect.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Crow, J. F. Hardy, Weinberg and language impediments. Genetics 152, 821–825 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Penrose, L. S. Parental age and mutation. Lancet 269, 312 –313 (1955).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Risch, N., Reigh, E. W., Wishnick, M. W. & McCarthy, J. G. Spontaneous mutation and parental age in humans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 41, 218–248 ( 1987).A detailed review and analysis of the classical literature on the paternal age effect.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Haldane, J. B. S. The mutation rate of the gene for hemophilia and its segregation ratios in males and females. Ann. Eugen. 13, 262– 271 (1947).The first measurement of a human mutation rate, as well as evidence for a higher male rate.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Becker, J. et al. Characterization of the factor VIII defect in 147 patients with sporadic hemophila A: Family studies indicate a mutation type-dependent sex ratio of mutation frequencies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58 , 657–670 (1996). The different kinds of mutation events leading to haemophilia and their relative frequency.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ketterling, R. P. et al. Germline origins in the human F9 gene: frequent G:C→A:T mosaicism and increased mutations with advanced maternal age. Hum. Genet. 105, 629–640 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Green, P. M. et al. Mutation rates in humans. I. Overall and sex-specific rates obtained from a population study of hemophilia B. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 1572–1579 ( 1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Francke, U. et al. The occurrence of new mutants in the X-linked recessive Lesch–Nyhan disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 28, 123– 137 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Tuchman, M. et al. Poportions of spontaneous mutations in males and females with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. Am. J. Med. Genet. 55, 67–70 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Thomas, G. H. High male:female ratio of germ-line mutations: An alternative explanation for postulated gestational lethality in males in X-linked dominant disorders . Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 1364– 1368 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Wilkin, D. J. et al. Mutations in fibroblast growth-factor receptor 3 in sporadic cases of achondroplasia occur exclusively on the paternally derived chromosome . Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 711– 716 (1998).A demonstration that achondroplasia mutations all occur in the father and at a particular CpG hot-spot.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Moloney, D. M. et al. Exclusive paternal origin of new mutations in Apert syndrome . Nature Genet. 13, 48– 53 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Carlson, K. M. et al. Parent-of-origin effects in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 55, 1076– 1082 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Schuffenecker, I. et al. Prevalence and parental origin of de novo RET mutations in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma . Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60, 233– 237 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Glaser, R. L. et al. Paternal origin of FGFR2 mutations in sporadic cases of Crouzon Syndrome and Pfeiffer Syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 768–777 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Bellus, G. A. et al. Achondroplasia is defined by recurrent G380R mutations of FGFR3. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 368– 373 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Vajo, Z., Francomano, C. A. & Wilkin, D. J. The molecular and genetic basis of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 disorders: the achondroplasia family of skeletal dyplasias, Muenke craniosynostosis, and Crouzon syndrome with acanthosis nigricans. Endocr. Rev. 21, 23–39 ( 2000).This paper summarizes the molecular events at the three loci with the highest male:female mutation rate ratio.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Kitamura, Y. et al. Maternally derived missense mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the ret protooncogene in a patient with de-novo men-2b. Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 1987–1988 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Vogel, F. & Rathenberg, R. Spontaneous mutation in man. Adv. Hum. Genet. 5, 223–318 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Drost, J. B. & Lee, W. R. Biological basis of germline mutation: Comparisons of spontaneous germline mutation rates among Drosophila, mouse, and human. Env. Mol. Mut. 25 (S26), 48–64 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Vogel, F. & Motulsky, A. G. Human Genetics; Problems and Approaches. (Springer, Berlin,1997). An unusually complete textbook of human genetics, with detail on mutation.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Grimm, T. G. et al. On the origin of deletetions and point mutations in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: most deletions arise in oogenesis and most point mutations result from events in spermatogenesis. J. Med. Gen. 31, 183–186 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Lazaro, C. et al. Sex differences in the mutation rate and mutational mechanism in the NF gene in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. Hum. Genet. 98, 696–699 ( 1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Fahsold, R. et al. Minor lesion mutational spectrum of the entire NF1 gene does not explain its high mutability but points to a functional domain upstream of the GAP-related domain. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 790–818 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lohmann, D. R., Brandt, B., Hopping, W., Passarge, E. & Horstemke, B. The spectrum of RB1germ-line mutations in hereditary retinoblastoma. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 940 –949 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Olson, J. M., Breslow, N. E. & Beckwith, J. B. Wilm's tumor and parental age: a report from the national Wilm's tumour study. Br. J. Cancer 67, 813–818 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Hassold, T. et al. Human aneuploidy: Incidence, origin, and etiology. Env. Mol. Mutagen. 28, 167–175 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Dryja, T. P., Morrow, J. F. & Rapaport, J. M. Quantification of the paternal allele bias for new germline mutations in the retinoblastoma gene. Hum. Genet. 100, 446–449 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Oldridge, M. et al. Genotype–phenotype correlation for nucleotide substitutions in the IgII–IgIII linker in FGFR2. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 137–143 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Olshan, A. F. et al. Paternal age and the risk of congenital heart defects. Teratology 50, 80–84 ( 1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Zhang, Y. et al. Parental age at child's birth and son's risk of prostate cancer . Am. J. Epidemiol. 150, 1208– 1212 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Tellier, A. L. et al. CHARGE syndrome: Report of 47 cases and review. Am. J. Med. Genet. 76, 402–409 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Fletcher, N. A. & Foley, J. Parental age, genetic mutation, and cerebral palsy. J. Med. Genet. 30, 44–46 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Bertram, L. et al. Paternal age is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease in the absence of a major gene. Neurogenetics 1, 277–280 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Antonarakis, J. P. et al. Factor VIII gene inversions in severe hemophilia: Results of an international consortium study. Blood 86, 2206–2212 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Cody, J. D. et al. Preferential loss of the paternal alleles in the 18q syndrome . Am. J. Med. Genet. 69, 280– 286 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Dallapiccola, B. et al. Parental origin of chromosome-4p deletion in Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 47, 921– 924 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Overhauser, J. et al. Parental origin of chromosome-5 deletions in the Cri-du-chat syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 37, 83– 86 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Duyao, M. et al. Trinucleotide repeat length instability and age of onset in Huntington's disease. Nature Genet. 4, 387– 392 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Kodaira, M., Satoh, C., Hiyama, K. & Toyama, K. Lack of effects of atomic bomb radiation on genetic instability of tandem-repetitive elements in human germ cells. Am. J. Hum Genet. 57, 1275–1283 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Ellegren, H. Heterogeneous mutation processes in human microsatellite DNA sequences. Nature Genet. 24, 400–402 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Xu, S., Peng, M., Fang, Z. & Xu, X. The direction of microsatellite mutations is dependent upon allele length. Nature Genet. 24, 396–399 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Eyre-Walker, A. & Keightley, P. D. High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids. Nature 397, 344–347 (1999).The first estimate of the total deleterious mutation rate for all genes in humans.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Gianneli, F. et al. Mutation rates in humans. II. Sporadic mutation-specific rates and rate of detrimental human mutations inferred from hemophilia B. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 1580–1587 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Cargill, M. et al. Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nature Genet. 22, 231–238 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Aparicio, S. A. J. R. How to count… human genes. Nature Genet. 25, 129–126 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Haldane, J. B. S. The effect of variation on fitness. Am. Nat. 71, 337–349 (1937).The original demonstration that mildly deleterious mutations cause the same reduction of fitness in the long run as drastic ones.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Muller, H. J. Our load of mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2, 111–176 (1950).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Crow, J. F. The high spontaneous mutation rate: is it a health risk? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8380–8386 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Crow, J. F. Spontaneous mutation in man. Mutat. Res. 437, 5–9 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Akiyama, M. et al. Mutation frequency in human blood cells increases with age . Mutat. Res. 338, 141– 149 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Bulmer, M. G. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. Efficiency of truncation selection . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 396– 399 (1979).A demonstration that quasi-truncation selection is almost as effective as strict truncation in eliminating deleterious mutant genes from the population.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Stern, C. Wilhelm Weinberg, 1862–1937. Genetics 47, 1– 5 (1962).

Download references

Acknowledgements

B. Dove has made several useful suggestions.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Related links

Related links

DATABASE LINKS

acondroplasia

Apert syndrome

basal cell nevus

CHARGE syndrome

cri-du-chat syndrome

Crouzon syndrome

Down syndrome

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

factor VIII locus

factor IX locus

FGFR3

FGFR2

fragile X syndrome

haemophilia A

haemophilia B

Huntington disease

Lesch–Nyhan syndrome

Marfan syndrome

MEN2B

MEN2A

myotonic dystrophy

neurofibromatosis type I

OTC deficiency

Pfeiffer syndrome

Progeria syndrome

retinoblastoma

RET

Waardenburg syndrome

Wilm tumour

Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome

Glossary

AUTOSOME

A chromosome other than the X or Y.

TRISOMY

Having three copies of a chromosome.

ANEUPLOID

Having an unbalanced chromosome number. An example is trisomy.

COMPLEX TRAIT

A trait determined by many genes, almost always interacting with environmental influences.

NONSYNONYMOUS

A nucleotide change that alters the coded amino acid.

NEUTRAL MUTATION

A mutation that is selectively equivalent to the allele from which it arose.

INDEL

Insertion or deletion in a chromosome.

FITNESS

A measure of the capacity to survive and reproduce.

GENETIC DEATH

A pre-reproductive death or failure to reproduce.

QUASI-TRUNCATION SELECTION

Approximate or inexact truncation selection — selection in which all individuals below a certain threshold survive and reproduce equally; the others are eliminated.

POISSON

A statistical distribution in which the probability of an individual event is small, but the number of opportunities is large enough that several occur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crow, J. The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation . Nat Rev Genet 1, 40–47 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35049558

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing