Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

ATP-dependent proteases

Docking of components in a bacterial complex

Abstract

Proteases are enzymes that cut up other proteins for the purposes of tailoring or degradation. Some depend on ATP as an energy source for unfolding protein substrates, and these are often organized into rings of ATPase subunits stacked coaxially onto rings of protease subunits1. Bochtler et al .2 have reported a crystal structure for the ATP-dependent protease complex HslVU (also known as ClpYQ) from Escherichia coli. They claim this consists of a double hexamer of the protease HslV flanked by hexamers of an ATPase, HslU, which mainly lie in a ring of ATPase domains whose I-domains protrude to form a smaller ring that binds HslV. Based on cryo-electron microscopy of HslVU in buffer conditions that support enzymatic activity, we find that the HslU rings bind in the opposite orientation — that is, their I-domains protrude distally instead of making contact with HslV. Redefinition of this interaction has implications for the functional architecture of the complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Averaged side-view projections of HslVU complexes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt, M., Lupas, A. N. & Finley, D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 3, 584 –591 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bochtler, M. et al. Nature 403, 800–805 (2000).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe, J. et al. Science 268, 533–539 (1995).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu, R. C., Hanson, P. I., Jahn, R. & Brunger, A . Nature Struct. Biol. 5, 803–811 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rohrwild, M. et al. Nature Struct. Biol. 4, 133– 139 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belnap, D. M. et al. J. Struct. Biol. 25, 166– 175 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuwald, A. F. et al. Genome Res. 9, 27– 43 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber-Ban, E. U., Reid, B. G., Miranker, A. D. & Horwitz, A. L. Nature 401, 90–93 ( 1999).

    Article  CAS  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, Y. I. et al. Mol. Cell 5, 639–48 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, S. K., Guo, F. & Maurizi, M. R. Biochemistry 38, 14906– 14915 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ortega, J., Singh, S. K., Ishikawa, T., Maurizi, M. R. & Steven, A. C. Mol. Cell (in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alasdair C. Steven.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishikawa, T., Maurizi, M., Belnap, D. et al. Docking of components in a bacterial complex. Nature 408, 667–668 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35047165

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35047165

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing