Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Notch signalling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock


In vertebrates with mutations in the Notch cell–cell communication pathway, segmentation fails: the boundaries demarcating somites, the segments of the embryonic body axis, are absent or irregular1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. This phenotype has prompted many investigations, but the role of Notch signalling in somitogenesis remains mysterious1,9,10,11,12. Somite patterning is thought to be governed by a “clock-and-wavefront” mechanism13: a biochemical oscillator (the segmentation clock) operates in the cells of the presomitic mesoderm, the immature tissue from which the somites are sequentially produced, and a wavefront of maturation sweeps back through this tissue, arresting oscillation and initiating somite differentiation14,15. Cells arrested in different phases of their cycle express different genes, defining the spatially periodic pattern of somites and controlling the physical process of segmentation1,16,17,18,19. Notch signalling, one might think, must be necessary for oscillation, or to organize subsequent events that create the somite boundaries. Here we analyse a set of zebrafish mutants and arrive at a different interpretation: the essential function of Notch signalling in somite segmentation is to keep the oscillations of neighbouring presomitic mesoderm cells synchronized.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Expression of deltaC in normal sibling embryos fixed at about the 10-somite stage.
Figure 2: deltaC expression patterns in embryos cultured in a temperature gradient, to give faster development on the right side than on the left.
Figure 3: Expression of deltaC and papc in mib, bea, des and aei mutants.
Figure 4: deltaC expression at early stages, from bud to 8 somites.
Figure 5: Signalling pathway proposed to keep oscillations in adjacent cells synchronized in the zebrafish.


  1. del Barco Barrantes, I. et al. Interaction between Notch signalling and Lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse. Curr. Biol. 9, 470–480 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Conlon, R. A., Reaume, A. G. & Rossant, J. Notch1 is required for the coordinate segmentation of somites. Development 121, 1533– 1545 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Evrard, Y. A., Lun, Y., Aulehla, A., Gan, L. & Johnson, R. L. lunatic fringe is an essential mediator of somite segmentation and patterning. Nature 394, 377–381 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hrabé de Angelis, M., McIntyre, J. & Gossler, A. Maintenance of somite borders in mice requires the Delta homologue Dll1. Nature 386, 717–721 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kusumi, K. et al. The mouse pudgy mutation disrupts Delta homologue Dll3 and initiation of early somite boundaries. Nature Genet. 19, 274–278 ( 1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oka, C. et al. Disruption of the mouse RBP-Jκ gene results in early embryonic death. Development 121, 3291– 3301 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong, P. C. et al. Presenilin 1 is required for Notch1 and DII1 expression in the paraxial mesoderm. Nature 387, 288–292 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, N. & Gridley, T. Defects in somite formation in lunatic fringe-deficient mice. Nature 394, 374–377 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jen, W. C., Gawantka, V., Pollet, N., Niehrs, C. & Kintner, C. Periodic repression of Notch pathway genes governs the segmentation of Xenopus embryos. Genes Dev. 13, 1486–1499 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Takke, C. & Campos-Ortega, J. A. her1, a zebrafish pair-rule like gene, acts downstream of Notch signalling to control somite development. Development 126, 3005– 3014 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pourquié, O. Notch around the clock. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 559–565 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, Y. -J., Smithers, L. & Lewis, J. Vertebrate segmentation: the clock is linked to Notch signalling. Curr. Biol. 8, R868– R871 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooke, J. & Zeeman, E. C. A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J. Theoret. Biol. 58, 455– 476 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmeirim, I., Henrique, D., Ish-Horowicz, D. & Pourquié, O. Avian hairy gene expression identifies a molecular clock linked to vertebrate segmentation and somitogenesis. Cell 91, 639–648 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McGrew, M. J., Dale, J. K., Fraboulet, S. & Pourquié, O. The lunatic fringe gene is a target of the molecular clock linked to somite segmentation in avian embryos. Curr. Biol. 8 , 979–982 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Keynes, R. J. & Stern, C. D. Mechanisms of vertebrate segmentation. Development 103, 413–429 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saga, Y., Hata, N., Koseki, H. & Taketo, M. M. Mesp2: a novel mouse gene expressed in the presegmented mesoderm and essential for segmentation initiation. Genes Dev. 11, 1827–1839 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Durbin, L. et al. Eph signaling is required for segmentation and differentiation of the somites. Genes Dev. 12, 3096– 3109 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto, A. et al. Zebrafish paraxial protocadherin is a downstream target of spadetail involved in morphogenesis of gastrula mesoderm. Development 125, 3389–3397 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Haddon, C. et al. Multiple delta genes and lateral inhibition in zebrafish primary neurogenesis. Development 125, 359 –370 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smithers, L., Haddon, C., Jiang, Y. -J. & Lewis, J. Sequence and embryonic expression of deltaC in the zebrafish. Mech. Dev. 90, 119–123 ( 2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Eeden, F. J. et al. Mutations affecting somite formation and patterning in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 153–164 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang, Y. -J. et al. Mutations affecting neurogenesis and brain morphology in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Development 123, 205–216 (1996).

    MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Eeden, F. J., Holley, S. A., Haffter, P. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Zebrafish segmentation and pair-rule patterning. Dev. Genet. 23, 65–76 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Haddon, C., Jiang, Y. -J., Smithers, L. & Lewis, J. Delta-Notch signalling and the patterning of sensory cell differentiation in the zebrafish ear: evidence from the mind bomb mutant. Development 125, 4637–4644 ( 1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holley, S. A., Geisler, R. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Contrl of her1 expression during zebrafish somitogenesis by a Delta-dependent oscillator and an independent wave-front activity. Genes Dev. 14, 1678 –1690 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, M., von Weizsäcker, E. & Campos-Ortega, J. A. Expression domains of a zebrafish homologue of the Drosophila pair-rule gene hairy correspond to primordia of alternating somites. Development 122, 2071–2078 (1996).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sawada, A. et al. Zebrafish mesp family genes, mesp-a and mesp-b are segmentally expressed in the presomitic mesoderm, and mesp-b confers the anterior identity to the developing somites. Development 127, 1691–1702 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aulehla, A. & Johnson, R. L. Dynamic expression of lunatic fringe suggests a link between Notch signaling and an autonomous cellular oscillator driving somite segmentation. Dev. Biol. 207, 49–61 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kimmel, C. B., Ballard, W. W., Kimmel, S. R., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. F. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dynam. 203, 253– 310 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank J. Campos-Ortega and S. Holley for sharing data before publication; E. de Robertis for the papc probe; Q. Xu for advice on time-lapse filming; and H. McNeill for comments. The work was supported by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund and by an EMBO Fellowship to Y.-J.J.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julian Lewis.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, YJ., Aerne, B., Smithers, L. et al. Notch signalling and the synchronization of the somite segmentation clock . Nature 408, 475–479 (2000).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing