Concurrent density dependence and independence in populations of arctic ground squirrels

Article metrics

Abstract

No population increases without limit. The processes that prevent this can operate in either a density-dependent way (acting with increasing severity to increase mortality rates or decrease reproductive rates as density increases), a density-independent way, or in both ways simultaneously1,2,3. However, ecologists disagree for two main reasons about the relative roles and influences that density-dependent and density-independent processes have in determining population size4,5. First, empirical studies showing both processes operating simultaneously are rare6. Second, time-series analyses of long-term census data sometimes overestimate dependence7,8. By using a density-perturbation experiment9,10,11,12 on arctic ground squirrels, we show concurrent density-dependent and density-independent declines in weaning rates, followed by density-dependent declines in overwinter survival during hibernation. These two processes result in strong, density-dependent convergence of experimentally increased populations to those of control populations that had been at low, stable levels.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Convergence of arctic ground squirrel population densities after the removal of the experimental treatments of the Kluane project18 in spring 1996.
Figure 2: Density-dependent rates of population change of arctic ground squirrels after the experimental treatments of the Kluane project18 were removed in spring 1996.
Figure 3: Mechanisms of population regulation in arctic ground squirrels.

References

  1. 1

    May, R. M. Stability in randomly fluctuating versus deterministic environments. Am. Nat. 107, 621–650 (1973).

  2. 2

    Turchin, P. in Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis (eds Cappuccino, N. & Price, P. W.) 19–40 (Academic, London, 1995).

  3. 3

    Sinclair, A. R. E. & Pech, R. P. Density dependence, stochasticity, compensation and predator regulation. Oikos 75, 164–173 (1996).

  4. 4

    Strong, D. R. in A New Ecology (eds Price, P. W., Slobodchikoff, C. N. & Gaud, W. S.) 313–327 (Wiley, New York, 1984).

  5. 5

    Murray, B. J. Jr Can the population regulation controversy be buried and forgotten? Oikos 84, 148–152 (1999).

  6. 6

    Leirs, H. et al. Stochastic seasonality and nonlinear density-dependent factors regulate population size in an African rodent. Nature 389, 176–180 (1997).

  7. 7

    Ostfeld, R. S., Canham, C. D. & Pugh, S. R. Intrinsic density-dependent regulation of vole populations. Nature 366, 259–261 (1993).

  8. 8

    Shenk, T. M., White, G. C. & Burnham, K. P. Sampling-variance effects on detecting density dependence from temporal trends in natural populations. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 445–463 (1998).

  9. 9

    Murdoch, W. W. Population regulation and population inertia. Ecology 51, 497–502 (1970).

  10. 10

    Sinclair, A. R. E. in Ecological Concepts (ed. Cherret, J. M.) 197–241 (Blackwell, Oxford, 1989).

  11. 11

    Harrison, S. & Cappuccino, N. in Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis (eds Cappuccino, N. & Price, P. W.) 131–147 (Academic, London, 1995).

  12. 12

    Cappuccino, N. & Harrison, S. in Frontiers of Population Ecology (eds Floyd, R. B., Sheppard, A. W. & De Barro, P. J.) 53–64 (CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1996).

  13. 13

    Boutin, S. et al. Population changes of the vertebrate community during a snowshoe hare cycle in Canada's boreal forest. Oikos 74, 69–80 (1995).

  14. 14

    Carl, E. A. Population control in arctic ground squirrels. Ecology 52, 395–413 (1971).

  15. 15

    Lacey, E. A., Wieczorek, J. R. & Tucker, P. K. Male mating behaviour and patterns of sperm precedence in Arctic ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 53, 565–779 (1997).

  16. 16

    Batzli, G. O. & Sobaski, S. T. Distribution, abundance, and foraging patterns of ground squirrels near Atkasook, Alaska. Arct. Alp. Res. 12, 501–510 (1980).

  17. 17

    Green, J. E. Population Regulation and Annual Cycles of Activity and Dispersal in the Arctic Ground Squirrel. Thesis, Univ. British Columbia (1977).

  18. 18

    Krebs, C. J. et al. Impact of food and predation on the snowshoe hare cycle. Science 269, 1112–1115 (1995).

  19. 19

    Hubbs, A. H. & Boonstra, R. Population limitation in Arctic ground squirrels: effects of food and predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 527–541 (1997).

  20. 20

    Karels, T. J., Byrom, A. E., Boonstra, R. & Krebs, C. J. The interactive effects of food and predators on reproduction and overwinter survival of arctic ground squirrels. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 235–247 (2000).

  21. 21

    Lewellen, R. H. & Vessey, S. H. The effect of density dependence and weather on population size of a polyvoltine species. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 571–594.

  22. 22

    Byrom, A. E. & Krebs, C. J. Natal dispersal of juvenile arctic ground squirrels in the boreal forest. Can. J. Zool. 77, 1048–1059 (1999).

  23. 23

    Florant, G. L. Lipid metabolism in hibernators: the importance of essential fatty acids. Am. Zool. 38, 331–340 (1998).

  24. 24

    Buck, C. L. & Barnes, B. M. Temperatures of hibernacula and changes in body composition of arctic ground squirrels over winter. J. Mamm. 80, 1264–1276 (1999).

  25. 25

    Anufriev, A. I. & Akhremenko, A. K. Energetic cost of hibernation of the Arctic ground squirrel. Sov. J. Ecol. 21, 279–283 (1990).

  26. 26

    Risch, T. S., Dobson, F. S. & Murie, J. O. Is mean litter size the most productive? a test in Columbian ground squirrels. Ecology 76, 1643–1654 (1995).

  27. 27

    Karels, T. J. Reproduction, Hibernation, and Population Regulation of Arctic Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus parryii plesius). Thesis, Univ. Toronto (2000).

  28. 28

    Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Browne, C. & Hines, J. E. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildl. Monogr. 107, 1–97 (1990).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Evans, E. Gillis, E. Gold, L. Hofer, J. Hoyle, H. Jewell, J. Lindell, C. McColl, C. Riley, W. Ruscoe, C. Walasek and J. Wilson for field assistance, and D. S. Hik, C. J. Krebs and J. R. Rosenfeld for comments and suggestions on the manuscript. This study was funded by a Northern Studies Training Program grant (Department of Indian and Northern Affairs) to T.J.K., a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) grant to R.B. and a NSERC collaborative special project grant to the Kluane boreal forest ecosystem project. T.J.K was supported by a fellowship from the University of Toronto.

Author information

Correspondence to Rudy Boonstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.