Large disparity between gallium and antimony self-diffusion in gallium antimonide

Article metrics

Abstract

The most fundamental mass transport process in solids is self-diffusion. The motion of host-lattice (‘self-’) atoms in solids is mediated by point defects such as vacancies or interstitial atoms, whose formation and migration enthalpies determine the kinetics of this thermally activated process1,2. Self-diffusion studies also contribute to the understanding of the diffusion of impurities, and a quantitative understanding of self- and foreign-atom diffusion in semiconductors is central to the development of advanced electronic devices. In the past few years, self-diffusion studies have been performed successfully with isotopically controlled semiconductor heterostructures of germanium3, silicon4, gallium arsenide5,6 and gallium phosphide7. Self-diffusion studies with isotopically controlled GaAs and GaP have been restricted to Ga self-diffusion, as only Ga has two stable isotopes, 69Ga and 71Ga. Here we report self-diffusion studies with an isotopically controlled multilayer structure of crystalline GaSb. Two stable isotopes exist for both Ga and Sb, allowing the simultaneous study of diffusion on both sublattices. Our experiments show that near the melting temperature, Ga diffuses more rapidly than Sb by over three orders of magnitude. This surprisingly large difference in atomic mobility requires a physical explanation going beyond standard diffusion models. Combining our data for Ga and Sb diffusion with related results for foreign-atom diffusion in GaSb (refs 8, 9), we conclude that the unusually slow Sb diffusion in GaSb is a consequence of reactions between defects on the Ga and Sb sublattices, which suppress the defects that are required for Sb diffusion.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Concentration–depth profiles of Ga and Sb isotopes in GaSb isotope heterostructures measured with SIMS.
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficients D of Ga, Sb and In in GaSb.

References

  1. 1

    Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group III , Vol. 26, Pt B, Diffusion in Solid Metals and Alloys (ed. Mehrer, H.) (Springer, Berlin, 1990).

  2. 2

    Landolt-Börnstein, New Series, Group III , Vol. 33, Pt A Diffusion in Semiconductors (ed. Beke, D. L.) (Springer, Berlin, 1998).

  3. 3

    Fuchs, H. D. et al.70Ge/ 74Ge isotope heterostructures: an approach to self-diffusion studies. Phys. Rev. B 51, 16817–16821 (1995).

  4. 4

    Bracht, H., Haller, E. E. & Clark-Phelps, R. Silicon self-diffusion in isotope heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 393– 396 (1998).

  5. 5

    Wang, L. et al. Ga self-diffusion in GaAs isotope heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2342–2345 (1996).

  6. 6

    Bracht, H., Norseng, M., Haller, E. E., Eberl, K. & Cardona, M. Enhanced and retarded Ga self-diffusion in Si and Be doped GaAs isotope heterostructures. Solid State Commun. 112, 301–314 ( 1999).

  7. 7

    Wang, L. et al. Gallium self-diffusion in gallium phosphide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1831–1833 ( 1997).

  8. 8

    Mathiot, D. & Edelin, G. Diffusion of indium in GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 41, 447–458 (1980).

  9. 9

    Edelin, G. & Mathiot, D. A model for the determination of the defect concentrations in III-V compounds: The case of GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 42, 95–110 (1980).

  10. 10

    Gude, A. & Mehrer, H. Diffusion in the D03-type intermetallic phase Fe3Si. Phil. Mag. A 76, 1–29 (1997).

  11. 11

    Salamon, M. & Mehrer, H. Diffusion in the B20-type phase FeSi. Phil. Mag. A 79, 2137– 2155 (1999).

  12. 12

    Bösker, G. et al. Arsenic diffusion in intrinsic gallium arsenide. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 527, 347– 356 (1998).

  13. 13

    Weiler, D. & Mehrer, H. Self-diffusion of gallium and antimony in GaSb. Phil. Mag. A 49, 309– 325 (1984).

  14. 14

    Tang, X.-P., Geyer, U., Busch, R., Johnson, W. L. & Wu, Y. Diffusion mechanisms in metallic supercooled liquids and glasses. Nature 402, 160– 162 (1999).

  15. 15

    Talwar, D. N. & Ting, C. S. Tight-binding calculations for the electronic structure of isolated vacancies and impurities in III-V compound semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 25, 2660– 2680 (1982).

  16. 16

    Xu, H. Electronic structure of neutral and charged vacancies in Ga-related III-V compound semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 4077– 4086 (1990).

  17. 17

    Kühn, W., Strehlow, R. & Hanke, M. Self-consistent tight-binding investigation of chemical trends for native defects in III-V semiconductors. Phys. Status Solidi B 151, 541–557 ( 1987).

  18. 18

    Walukiewicz, W. Mechanism of Fermi level stabilization in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 37, 4760–4763 ( 1988).

  19. 19

    Walukiewicz, W. Amphoteric native defects in semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2094–2096 ( 1989).

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.B. acknowledges a Feodor Lynen fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung. This work was supported in part by the Office of Energy Research, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Science Division of the US Department of Energy, and the US National Science Foundation.

Author information

Correspondence to E. E. Haller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.