Abstract
Alewell et al. introduce some important factors influencing the process of ecosystem recovery from acidification. But whereas we exclusively considered aquatic acidification and recovery1, they focus on soil acidification.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stoddard, J. L. et al. Nature 401, 575–578 (1999).
Church, M. R., Shaffer, P. W., Eshleman, K. N. & Rochelle, B. P. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 50, 39–48 (1990).
Stoddard, J. L., Driscoll, C. T., Kahl, S. & Kellogg, J. Ecol. Appl. 8, 288–299 ( 1998).
Husar, R. B., Sullivan, T. J. & Charles, D. F. in Acidic Deposition and Aquatic Ecosystems: Regional Case Studies (ed. Charles, D. F.) 65–82 (Springer, New York, 1991).
Mylona, S. Trends of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions, Air Concentrations and Depositions of Sulphur in Europe since 1880 (International Cooperative Programme for the Monitoring and Evaluation of Long Range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe/Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West, 1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoddard, J., Jeffries, D., Lükewille, A. et al. reply: Is acidification still an ecological threat?. Nature 407, 857–858 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35038161
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35038161
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.