Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality

Nature volume 350, pages 337–339 (1991)Cite this article

Abstract

FEMALE choice of mates based on the expression of characters that correlate with male quality remains a controversial and largely untested idea1. By choosing quality males, females stand to gain resources2, genetic benefits for their offspring3–5, or both. In the house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), male plumage coloration is a function of dietary intake of carotenoids6,7. Here I present results of field studies that indicate that females prefer to mate with colourful males and that plumage brightness correlates with a male's capactity for parental care and perhaps its genotypic quality. Artificially brightened males paired more quickly and frequently than sham control or lightened males. Among unmanipulated males, plumage coloration was correlated with nest attentiveness and overwinter survival. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the coloration of fathers and sons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bradbury, J. W. & Andersson, M. B. (eds) Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives (Wiley, New York, 1987).

  2. Hoelzer, G. A. Anim. Behav. 38, 1067–1078 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zahavi, A. J. theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Science 218, 384–387 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson, M. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brush, A. H. & Power, D. M. Auk 93, 725–739 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hill, G. E. Auk (in the press).

  8. Gill, D. E. & Lanyon, W. E. Bird-Banding 36, 1–14 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill, G. E. Anim. Behav. 40, 563–572 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson, W. L. Condor 62, 245–271 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Michener, H. & Michener, J. R. Condor 33, 12–19 (1931).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergtoid, W. H. Auk 30, 40–73 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Crespi, B. J. & Bookstein, F. L. Evolution 43, 18–29 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Andersson, M. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 17, 375–393 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dominey, W. J. J. theor. Biol. 101, 495–502 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Am. Nat. 124, 309–323 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nur, N. & Hasson, O. J. theor. Biol. 110, 275–297 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Endler, J. A. Evolution 34, 76–91 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Endler, J. A. Environ, biol. Fishes 9, 173–190 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 17, 199–205 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kodric-Brown, A. Behavl ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 393–401 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. Nature 344, 330–333 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Zoology and Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA

    Geoffrey E. Hill

Authors
  1. Geoffrey E. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, G. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350, 337–339 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/350337a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/350337a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing