Letter | Published:

Non-quantized penetration of magnetic field in the vortex state of superconductors

Nature volume 407, pages 5557 (07 September 2000) | Download Citation



As first pointed out by Bardeen and Ginzburg in the early sixties1,2, the amount of magnetic flux carried by vortices in superconducting materials depends on their distance from the sample edge, and can be smaller than one flux quantum, φ0 = h/2e (where h is Planck's constant and e is the electronic charge). In bulk superconductors, this reduction of flux becomes negligible at sub-micrometre distances from the edge, but in thin films the effect may survive much farther into the material3,4. But the effect has not been observed experimentally, and it is often assumed that magnetic field enters type II superconductors in units of φ0. Here we measure the amount of flux introduced by individual vortices in a superconducting film, finding that the flux always differs substantially from φ0. We have observed vortices that carry as little as 0.001φ0, as well as ‘negative vortices’, whose penetration leads to the expulsion of magnetic field. We distinguish two phenomena responsible for non-quantized flux penetration: the finite-size effect1,2,3,4 and a nonlinear screening of the magnetic field due to the presence of a surface barrier. The latter effect has not been considered previously, but is likely to cause non-quantized penetration in most cases.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    Quantization of flux in a superconducting cylinder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 162–163 ( 1961).

  2. 2.

    Magnetic flux quantization in a superconducting cylinder. Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 207–209 ( 1962).

  3. 3.

    Flux penetration in a thin superconducting disk. Phys. Rev. B 22, 1200–1213 (1980).

  4. 4.

    Pearl's vortex near the film edge. Phys. Rev. B 49, 15874–15878 (1994).

  5. 5.

    , & Collective vortex motion in Mo-Ge superconducting thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 670– 673 (1993).

  6. 6.

    et al. Transport properties governed by surface barriers in BiSrCaCuO. Nature 391, 373–376 (1998).

  7. 7.

    et al. Ballistic Hall micromagnetometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2379–2381 ( 1997).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Paramagnetic Meissner effect in small superconductors. Nature 396, 144– 146 (1998).

  9. 9.

    et al. Fine structure in magnetization of individual fluxoid states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1528– 1531 (2000).

  10. 10.

    & Flux penetration and expulsion in thin superconducting disks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2049–2052 (1999).

  11. 11.

    Metastability and paramagnetism in superconducting disks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1796–1799 (2000).

Download references


We thank V. Kogan for discussions, and FOM, INTAS and NATO for financial support.

Author information


  1. *University of Nijmegen, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    • A. K. Geim
    • , S. V. Dubonos
    • , I. V. Grigorieva
    •  & K. S. Novoselov
  2. †Department of Physics, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK

    • A. K. Geim
    •  & I. V. Grigorieva
  3. ‡Institute for Microelectronics Technology , 142432 Chernogolovka, Russia

    • S. V. Dubonos
  4. §Department of Physics, University of Antwerpen (UIA), B-2610 Antwerpen, Belgium

    • F. M. Peeters
    •  & V. A. Schweigert
  5. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia

    • V. A. Schweigert


  1. Search for A. K. Geim in:

  2. Search for S. V. Dubonos in:

  3. Search for I. V. Grigorieva in:

  4. Search for K. S. Novoselov in:

  5. Search for F. M. Peeters in:

  6. Search for V. A. Schweigert in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. K. Geim.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.