Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

A self-extending paediatric leg implant

This device spares the need for surgical intervention by simulating natural limb growth.

Abstract

Biological regeneration of the extremities can occur in some organisms (starfish, for example), but humans need recourse to a mechanical solution. Growing children present a particular challenge, and those who lose bone tissue from the knee after removal of a tumour need an implant that can not only provide stability for the femur and allow motion of the knee joint, but which also accommodates rapid growth. Here we describe a self-extending leg implant (endoprosthesis) that can closely simulate natural growth and which has worked successfully in paediatric patients. The energy needed for elongation of this device is provided by the patients themselves as a result of flexure of the knee joint, thereby reducing the number of operations and the risk of infection associated with manually extended implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Function of the self-actuating extendible endoprosthesis (known as an intercondylar stepless-extension module).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chao, E. Y. S. & Sim, F. H. in Tumor Prostheses for Bone and Joint Reconstruction: Design and Application (eds Chao, E. Y. S. & Ivins, J. C.). 335–359 (Thieme, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kotz, R., Ritschl, P. & Trachtenbrodt, J. Orthopedics 9, 1639– 1652 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scales, J. T., Sneath, R. S. & Wright, K. W. J. in Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Oncology (ed. Enneking, W. F.) 52–60 (Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis, M. M., Spires, W. P. Jr & Bloom, N. in Limb Salvage in Musculoskeletal Oncology (ed. Enneking, W. F.) 606–610 (Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kotz, R., Schiller, C., Windhager, R. & Ritschl, P. in Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions (eds Langlais, F. & Tomeno, B.) 591–599 (Springer, Berlin, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Eckardt, J. J. et al. in Limb Salvage: Major Reconstructions in Oncologic and Nontumoral Conditions (eds Langlais, F. & Tomeno, B.) 585– 590 (Springer, Berlin, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiller, C. et al. J. Bone Jt Surg. 77B, 608– 614 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittermeyer, F. et al. Clin. Orthoped. (submitted).

  9. Windhager, R., Robioneck, B., Bien, M., Müller, H. & Kotz, R. Medizinisch Orthopadische Technik 115, 152–154 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Kotz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kotz, R., Windhager, R., Dominkus, M. et al. A self-extending paediatric leg implant. Nature 406, 143–144 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35018155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35018155

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing