Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Biotechnology

Enzymatic production of biohydrogen

Abstract

Although in theory the amount of hydrogen that could be generated from renewable sources of energy such as cellulose (a polymer of glucose) is vast1, only 16–24% of the maximum stoichiometric yield of hydrogen from glucose (about 12 mol H2 per mol glucose) is typically achieved by biological methods2. Here we show that the enzymes of the oxidative pentose phosphate cycle3,4,5 can be coupled to hydrogenase purified from the bacterium Pyrococcus furiosus, one of only a few hydrogenases that use NADP+ as the electron carrier6, to generate 11.6 mol H2 per mol glucose-6-phosphate. Hydrogen produced by this pathway is the major product, unlike that produced by intermediate metabolic pathways of bacterial fermentation, and therefore has important practical implications for biohydrogen production7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Hydrogen production by enzymes of the oxidative pentose phosphate cycle.

References

  1. Woodward, J. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 872– 874 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keasling, J. D. et al. in Biohydrogen (ed. Zaborsky, O. R.) 87– 97 (Plenum, New York, 1998).

  3. Horecker, B. L. & Smyrniotis, P. Z. Arch. Biochem. 29, 232–241 ( 1950).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Couri, D. & Racker, E. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 83, 195–205 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehninger, A. L. Biochemistry 2nd edn (Worth, New York, 1975).

  6. Ma, K., Zhou, Z. H. & Adams, M. W. W. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 122, 245–250 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benemann, J. R. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 1101–1103 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J. W. et al. Science 273, 364–367 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenbaum, E. Photobiochem. Photobiophys. 8, 323– 332 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stull, D. R., Westrum, E. F. & Sinke, G. C. in The Chemical Thermodynamics of Organic Compounds 680 (Wiley, New York, 1969).

  11. Lide, D. R. & Frederikse, H. P. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 5-16, 5-24 (CRC, London, 1995).

  12. Chenault, H. K. & Whitesides, G. M. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 14, 147–197 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakajima, H. et al. ACS Symp. Ser. 466 (eds Bednarski, M. D. & Simon, E. S) 111–120 (Am. Chem. Soc., Washington DC, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Woodward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woodward, J., Orr, M., Cordray, K. et al. Enzymatic production of biohydrogen. Nature 405, 1014–1015 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35016633

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35016633

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing