Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Cell biology

Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves

A Retraction to this article was published on 22 March 2006


Exposure limits set for microwave radiation assume that any biological effects result from tissue heating1: non-thermal effects have been reported but remain controversial. We show here that prolonged exposure to low-intensity microwave fields can induce heat-shock responses in the soil nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. This effect appears to be non-thermal, suggesting that current exposure limits set for microwave equipment may need to be reconsidered.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Saline9 suspensions of young adult PC72 worms grown synchronously at 15 °C (ref. 10) were split between three conditions for a total of 18 h: (1) exposed to microwaves (in TEM cell at 750 MHz and 0.5 W; ref. 5) within a Leec LT3 incubator; (2) temperature controls shielded with aluminium foil in the same incubator; (3) baseline controls at 15 °C.
Figure 2: PC72 and PC161 (similar to PC72, but carrying an additional GFP reporter under hsp16 control) worms were either exposed for 18 h at 25 °C to microwaves (750 MHz, 0.5 W) or kept as 25 °C controls, then reporter expression was localized in situ by staining with X-gal (PC72) or viewing under ultraviolet light on a fluorescence microscope (PC161).


  1. 1

    ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 American National Standard-Safety Levels with Respect to Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz (IEEE, New York, 1992).

  2. 2

    Parsell, D. & Lindquist, S. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27, 437–496 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Dennis, J., Mutawakil, M., Lowe, K. & de Pomerai, D. Aquatic Toxicol. 40, 37–50 ( 1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Candido, E. & Jones, D. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 125–129 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Daniells, C. et al. Mutat. Res. 399, 55– 64 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Snutch, T. & Baillie, D. Can. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 61, 480–487 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Gandhi, O., Lazzi, G. & Furse, C. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theor. Tech. 44, 1884–1897 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nishizawa, J. et al. Circulation 99, 934– 941 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Williams, P. & Dusenbery, D. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 9, 1285–1290 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Jewitt, N., Anthony, P., Lowe, K. & de Pomerai, D. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 25, 349–356 ( 1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Pomerai, D., Daniells, C., David, H. et al. Non-thermal heat-shock response to microwaves . Nature 405, 417–418 (2000).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing