Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Vision

Myopia and ambient night-time lighting

Abstract

Quinn et al. report a strong association between myopia in children and their exposure to night-time lighting during their first two years1. We have been unable to confirm this surprising result, but we find that myopic parents are more likely to employ night-time lighting aids for their children. Moreover, there is an association between myopia in parents and their children2,3.

Main

We acquired child and parent refraction information as part of a 24-year longitudinal study of visual development in children. These children were research subjects and are not a clinical population. Refractions from 213 children and their parents are included; all children were refracted in the laboratory by non-cycloplegic retinoscopy.

One limitation of Quinn et al.'s study is a lack of information about the refractive status of the parents. Parents in our study were either tested in the laboratory or their spectacle prescriptions were used; if they had never worn glasses and could see clearly at a distance, they were classed as non-myopic.

Subjects (100 females and 113 males) ranged in age from 2 to 24 years, with a mean of 11 years. The data were divided into two groups: myopes, with a spherical equivalent refractive error ranging from −9.0 to −0.5 dioptres (mean, −2.50 dioptres), and non-myopes, with a spherical equivalent refractive error more positive than −0.5 dioptres (range, −0.38 to −4.38 dioptres; mean, −0.87 dioptres). Answers to questionnaires on nursery lighting conditions at night were collected from parents over the telephone, using the questions of Quinn et al. and a few extra ones. One asked parents to rate their confidence in the reliability of their recall of night-time lighting conditions from years earlier: 98% were confident in their responses.

The prevalence of myopia in our sample of children was not associated with ambient light exposure at night during their first two years, or later in life: 20% of those who slept with night lights before age 2 were myopic — the same incidence as in children who slept in the dark. There were no myopes among the small group who slept with full room illumination. This result was not related to either age of onset (mean, 10.5 years) or the severity of myopia.

Families with two myopic parents, however, reported the use of ambient lighting at night significantly more than those with zero or one myopic parent (χ2=7.42, P<0.025). This could be related either to their own poor visual acuity, necessitating lighting to see the child more easily at night, or to the higher socio-economic level of myopic parents, who use more child-monitoring devices. Myopia in children was associated with parental myopia, as reported previously2,3. The proportion of myopic children with two myopic parents was significantly greater than the proportion of myopic children with zero or one myopic parent (χ2=4.42, P<0.05).

Based on these results, we question whether parents need to be concerned about causing myopia in their children by lighting their nurseries at night.

See also K. Zadnik et al.  Reply: R. Stone et al.

References

  1. 1

    Quinn, G., Shin, C., Maguire, M. & Stone, R. Nature 399, 113–114 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Gwiazda, J., Thorn, F., Bauer, J. & Held, R. Clin. Vision Sci. 8, 337–344 ( 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Pacella, R. et al. Optom. Vision Sci. 76, 381– 386 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gwiazda, J., Ong, E., Held, R. et al. Myopia and ambient night-time lighting. Nature 404, 144 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35004663

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing