Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats


Bats (order Chiroptera) are one of the few orders of mammals that echolocate and the only group with the capacity for powered flight. The order is subdivided into Microchiroptera and Megachiroptera, with an array of characteristics defining each group1, including complex laryngeal echolocation systems in microbats and enhanced visual acuity in megabats. The respective monophylies of the two suborders have been tacitly assumed, although microbat monophyly is uncorroborated by molecular data. Here we present a phylogenetic analysis of bat relationships using DNA sequence data from four nuclear genes and three mitochondrial genes (total of 8,230 base pairs), indicating that microbat families in the superfamily Rhinolophoidea are more closely related to megabats than they are to other microbats. This implies that echolocation systems either evolved independently in rhinolophoids and other microbats or were lost in the evolution of megabats. Our data also reject flying lemur (order Dermoptera) as the bat sister group, indicating that presumed shared derived characters for flying lemurs and bats2 are convergent features that evolved in association with gliding and flight, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Maximum likelihood trees with branch lengths drawn proportional to amount of sequence change and with maximum likelihood bootstrap figures indicated.
Figure 2: Bootstrap support using neighbour-joining with logdet distances, for various phylogenetic associations.


  1. Novacek, M. J. in Proceedings of the 5th International Bat Research Conference (eds Wilson, D. E. & Gardner, A. L. ) 317–330 (Texas Tech, Lubbock, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Simmons, N. B. Bat relationships and the origin of flight. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 67, 27–43 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, J. E. & Smith,, J. D. in Bats: A Natural History (Heffers, England, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simmons, N. B. & Geisler, J. H. Phylogenetic relationships of Icaronycteris, Archaeonycteris, Hassianycteris and Palaeochiropteryx to extant bat lineages, with comments on the evolution of echolocation and foraging strategies in Microchiroptera. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 235, 1–182 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pumo,, D. E. et al. Complete mitochondrial genome of a neotropical fruit bat, Artibeus jamaicensis, and a new hypothesis of relationships of bats to other Eutherian mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 47, 709–717 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Springer, M. S., Amrine, H. M., Burk, A. & Stanhope, M. J. Additional support for Afrotheria and Paenungulata, the performance of mitochondrial versus nuclear genes, and the impact of data partitions with heterogenous base composition. Syst. Biol. 48, 65–75 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Swofford,, D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1998).

  8. Cummings, M. P., Otto, S. P. & Wakeley, J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 814–822 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J. & Hillis,, D. M. in Molecular Systematics (eds Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K.) 407–514 (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutcheon, J. M., Kirsh, J. A. W & Pettigrew,, J. D. Base-compositional biases and the bat problem. III.The question of microchiropteran monophyly. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 607–617 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woodburne, M. O. & Swisher,, C. C. in Geochronology, Time Scales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation (eds Beggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Aubry, M. & Hardenbol, J.) Special Publ. Soc. Sedim. Geol. 54 335–364 (Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Altringham, J. D. Bats: Biology and Behaviour. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1996).

  13. Miller, G. S. The families and genera of bats. Bull. US Natl Mus. 57, 1–282 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novacek, M. J. & Wyss, A. R. Higher-level relationships of the recent eutherian orders: morphological evidence. Cladistics 2, 257–287 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beard,, K. C. in Primates and their relatives in phylogenetic perspective (ed. MacPhee, R. D. E.) 63–90 (Plenum, New York, 1993).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Rayner, J. M. V. The cost of being a bat. Nature 350, 383–384 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gould, E. Evidence for echolocation in the Tenrecidae of Madagascar. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 109, 352–360 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tomasi, T. E. Echolocation by the short-tailed shrew Blarina brevicauda. J. Mammal. 60, 751–759 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forsman, K. A. & Malmquist,, M. G. Evidence for echolocation in the common shrew, Sorex araneus. J. Zool. Lond. 216, 655–662 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Speakman,, J. R & Racey, P. A. No cost of echolocation for bats in flight. Nature 350, 421–423 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalko, E. K. V. Coupling of sound emission and wing-beat in naturally foraging European pipistrelle (Microchiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Folia Zool. 43, 363–376 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Springer, M. S. et al. Endemic African mammals shake the phylogenetic tree. Nature 388, 61–64 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stanhope, M. J. et al. Molecular evidence for multiple origins of Insectivora and for a new order of endemic African insectivore mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9967–9972 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order within Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29, 170–179.

  25. Templeton, A. R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37, 221–244 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lyons-Weiler, J., Hoelzer, G. A. & Tausch, R. J. Relative Apparent Synapomorphy Analysis (RASA) I: the statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 749–757 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by grants from the Training and Mobility of Researchers programme of the European Commission to M.J.S., and the National Science Foundation to M.S.S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Stanhope.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teeling, E., Scally, M., Kao, D. et al. Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats. Nature 403, 188–192 (2000).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing