It has been proposed1 that gene-regulatory circuits with virtually any desired property can be constructed from networks of simple regulatory elements. These properties, which include multistability and oscillations, have been found in specialized gene circuits such as the bacteriophage λ switch2 and the Cyanobacteria circadian oscillator3. However, these behaviours have not been demonstrated in networks of non-specialized regulatory components. Here we present the construction of a genetic toggle switch—a synthetic, bistable gene-regulatory network—in Escherichia coli and provide a simple theory that predicts the conditions necessary for bistability. The toggle is constructed from any two repressible promoters arranged in a mutually inhibitory network. It is flipped between stable states using transient chemical or thermal induction and exhibits a nearly ideal switching threshold. As a practical device, the toggle switch forms a synthetic, addressable cellular memory unit and has implications for biotechnology, biocomputing and gene therapy.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Modod, J. & Jacob, F. General conclusions: teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 26, 389–401 (1961).
Ptashne, M. A Genetic Switch: Phage λ and Higher Organisms (Cell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1992).
Ishiura, M. et al. Expression of a gene cluster kaiABC as a circadian feedback process in cyanobacteria. Science 281, 1519–1523 (1998).
Schellenberger, W., Eschrich, K. & Hofmann, E. Self-organization of a glycolytic reconstituted enzyme system: alternate stable stationary states, hysteretic transitions and stabilization of the energy charge. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 19, 257–284 (1980).
Glass, L. & Kauffman, S. A. The logical analysis of continuous, non-linear biochemical control networks. J. Theor. Biol. 39, 103–129 (1973).
Glass, L. Classification of biological networks by their qualitative dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 54, 85–107 (1975).
Glass, L. Combinatorial and topological methods in nonlinear chemical kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1325–1335 (1975).
Kauffman, S. The large scale structure and dynamics of gene control circuits: an ensemble approach. J. Theor. Biol. 44, 167– 190 (1974).
Thomas, R. Logical analysis of systems comprising feedback loops. J. Theor. Biol. 73, 631–656 ( 1978).
Thomas, R. Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: a logical description. J. Theor. Biol. 153, 1– 23 (1991).
Tchuraev, R. N. A new method for the analysis of the dynamics of the molecular genetic control systems. I. Description of the method of generalized threshold models. J. Theor. Biol. 151, 71–87 (1991).
Arkin, A. & Ross, J. Computational functions in biochemical reaction networks. Biophys. J. 67, 560– 578 (1994).
Bhalla, U. S. & Iyengar, R. Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. Science 283, 381–387 (1999).
Yagilo, G. & Yagil, E. On the relation between effector concentration and the rate of induced enzyme synthesis. Biophys. J. 11, 11–27 (1971).
Shea, M. A. & Ackers, G. K. The OR control system of bacteriophage Lambda: a physical-chemical model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 181, 211–230 (1985).
Smith, T. F., Sadler, J. R. & Goad, W. Statistical–mechanical modeling of a regulatory protein: the Lactose repressor. Math. Biosci. 36, 61–86 (1977).
Arkin, A., Ross, J. & McAdams, H. H. Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149, 1633–1648 (1998).
McAdams, H. H. & Arkin, A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 814–819 (1997).
McAdams, H. H. & Arkin, A. Stimulation of prokaryotic genetic circuits. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 27, 199–224 (1998).
Lutz, R. & Bujard, H. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1203–1210 (1997).
Cormack, B. P., Valdivia, R. H. & Falkow, S. FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Gene 173, 33–38 (1996).
Ausubel, F. M. et al. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Wiley, New York, 1987).
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, New York, 1989).
Edelstein-Keshet, L. Mathematical Models in Biology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988).
Kaplan, D. & Glass, L. Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics (Springer, New York, 1995).
Yagil, E. & Yagil, G. On the relation between effector concentration and the rate of induced enzyme synthesis. Biophys. J. 11, 11–27 (1971).
Rubinow, S. I. Introduction to Mathematical Biology (Wiley, New York, 1975).
We thank M. Bitensky and T. Yoshida for providing access to their flow cytometer; Y. Yu for his suggestions on plasmid construction; C. Sabanayagam for his technical advice; and C. Chow for his mathematical advice. This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research and the College of Engineering at Boston University.
Center for Advanced Biotechnology, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA
About this article
Transitions in the cell-fate induction induced by colored noise associated with the inductive stimulus
Journal of Theoretical Biology (2020)
IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience (2019)
Nature Medicine (2019)
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Systems Biology and Medicine (2019)