Letter | Published:

Requirement for the replication protein SSB in human DMA excision repair

Abstract

REPLICATIONand repair are essential processes that maintain the continuity of the genetic material. Dissection of simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication has resulted in the identification of many eukaryotic replication proteins, but the biochemistry of the multienzyme process of DNA excision repair is less well defined. One protein that is absolutely required for semiconservative replication of SV40 DNA in vitro is human single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB, also called RF-A and RP-A)1–3. SSB consists of three polypeptides of relative molecular mass 70,000, 34,000 and 13,000, and acts with T antigen and topoisomerases to unwind DNA, allowing the access of other replication proteins. Human SSB can also stimulate the activity of polymerases α and δ, suggesting a further role in elongation during DNA replication4–6. We have now found a role for human SSB in DNA excision repair using a cell-free system that can carry out nucleotide excision repair in vitro7. Monoclonal antibodies against human SSB caused extensive inhibition of DNA repair in plasmid molecules damaged by ultraviolet light or acetylaminofluorene. Addition of purified SSB reversed this inhibition and further stimulated repair synthesis by increasing the number of repair events. These results show that a mammalian DNA replication protein is also essential for repair.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Wobbe, C. R. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 1834–1838 (1987).

  2. 2

    Fairman, M. P. & Stillman, B. EMBO J. 7, 1211–1218 (1988).

  3. 3

    Wold, M. S. & Kelly, T. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2523–2527 (1988).

  4. 4

    Kenny, M. K., Lee, S.-H. & Hurwitz, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 9757–9761 (1989).

  5. 5

    Tsurimoto, T. & Stillman, B. EMBO J. 8, 3883–3889 (1989).

  6. 6

    Kenny, M. K., Schlegel, U., Furneaux, H. & Hurwitz, J. J. biol. Chem. 265, 7693–7700 (1990).

  7. 7

    Wood, R. D., Robins, P. & Lindahl, T. Cell 53, 97–106 (1988).

  8. 8

    Manley, J. L., Fire, A., Cano, A., Sharp, P. A. & Gefter, M. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 77, (1980).

  9. 9

    Wood, R. D. Biochemistry, 28, 8287–8292 (1989).

  10. 10

    Hansson, J. & Wood, R. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 8073–8091 (1989).

  11. 11

    Sibghat-Ullah, Husain, I. & Sancar, A. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4471–4484 (1989).

  12. 12

    Hansson, J., Munn, M., Rupp, W. D., Kahn, R. & Wood, R.D. J. biol. Chem. 264, 21788–21792 (1989).

  13. 13

    Cleaver, J. E. & Kraemer, K. H. in The Metabolic Basis of Inherited Disease 6th Edn (eds Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S. & Valle, D.) 2949–2971 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989).

  14. 14

    Hansson, J., Grossman, L., Lindahl, T. & Wood, R. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 35–40 (1990).

  15. 15

    Ikeda, J.-E., Enomoto, T. & Hurwitz, J. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 884–888 (1981).

  16. 16

    Wood, R. D., Lindahl, T. & Robins, P. in Mechanisms and Consequences of DNA Damage Processing (eds Friedberg, E. C. & Hanawalt, P.) 57–61 (Liss, New York, 1988).

  17. 17

    Tanaka, K. et al. Nature 343, 73–76 (1990).

  18. 18

    Weeda, G. et al. Cell 62, 777–791 (1990).

  19. 19

    Nishida, C., Reinhard, P. & Linn, S. J. biol. Chem. 263, 501–510 (1988).

  20. 20

    Toulmé, J. J., Behmoaras, T., Guigues, M. & Hélène, C. EMBO J. 2, 505–510 (1983).

  21. 21

    Van Houten, B. Microbiol. Rev. 54, 18–51 (1990).

  22. 22

    Caron, P. R., Kushner, S. R. & Grossman, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 4925–4929 (1985).

  23. 23

    Husain, I., Van Houten, B., Thomas, D. C., Abdel-Monem, M. & Sancar, A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 6774–6778 (1985).

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.