Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evidence from reversal of handedness in C. elegans embryos for early cell interactions determining cell fates

Abstract

MANY animals with overall bilateral symmetry also exhibit some left–right asymmetries with generally invariant handedness. Therefore, the left–right embryonic axis must have a consistent polarity, whose origins and subsequent effects on development are not understood (reviewed in ref. 1). Caenorhabditis elegans exhibits such left–right asymmetries at all developmental stages. The embryonic cell lineage is asymmetric as well: although the animal is generally bilaterally symmetric, many of its contralaterally analogous cells arise from different lineages on the two sides of the embryo2,3. I accomplished reversal of embryonic handedness by micromanipulation at the 6-cell stage, which resulted in mirror-image but otherwise normal development into healthy, fertile animals with all the usual left–right asymmetries reversed. This result demonstrates that in the 6-cell embryo the pair of anterior (AB) blastomeres on the right is equivalent to the pair on the left, and that the extensive differences in fates between lineally homologous derivatives of these cells on the two sides of the animal must be dictated by cell interactions, most of which are likely to occur early in embryogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, N. A. & Wolpert, L. Development 109, 1–9 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sulston, J. E. et al., Devl Biol. 100, 64–119 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sulston, J. E. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 48, 443–452 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sulston, J. E. & Horvitz, H. R. Devl Biol. 56, 110–156 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. White, J. G. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 314, 1–340 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. White, J. in The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (ed. Wood, W. B.) 81–122 (Cold Spring Harbor, Laboratory, New York,, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Priess, J. & Thomson, J. N. Cell 48, 241–250 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. zur Strassen, O. Arch. EntwMech. Org. 3, 27–105 (1896).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dünschen, F. Arch. EntwMech. Org. 115, 237–335 (1929).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonfig, R. Z. Wissensch. Zool. 124, 407–456 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laufer, J. S., Bazzicalupo, P. & Wood, W. B. Cell 19, 569–577 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowan, A. E. & Mclntosh, J. R. Cell 41, 923–932 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Edgar, L. G. & McGhee, J. D. Cell 53, 589–599 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schierenberg, E. Devl Biol. 122, 452–463 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Priess, J. R., Schnabel, H. & Schnabel, R. Cell 51, 601–611 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yochem, J. & Greenwald, I. Cell 58, 553–563 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sulston, J. & Hodgkin, J. in The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (ed. Wood, W. B.) 587–606 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deppe, U. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75, 376–380 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wood, W. Evidence from reversal of handedness in C. elegans embryos for early cell interactions determining cell fates. Nature 349, 536–538 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/349536a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/349536a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing