Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric rock paintings by selective oxidation of organic carbon

Abstract

DATING of prehistoric rock paintings (pictographs) has traditionally relied on indirect evidence. This includes inferences based on the archaeological context, such as superpositions of pictorial styles1 and the depiction of images that constrain their ages1,2, as well as dating of deposits that either cover the art in situ3,4 or contain separated fragments of the painted surface5. Migration of ions between the bulk rock and the natural coatings that form on a newly exposed surface has also been exploited to date petroglyphs (rock carvings) in desert regions6–13. Until recently14–17, however, direct dating (by radiocarbon techniques) of pictographs has not been possible18,19, mainly because of the problem of separating inorganic carbon from the organic material in the pigments. Here we report on a new technique which allows this separation to be effected by using a low-temperature, low-pressure oxygen plasma to oxidize selectively the organic component; this may then be analysed using standard14C methods. We have applied this technique to a portion of a pictograph from the Lower Pecos region of southwest Texas (Fig. 1). The date obtained, 3,865±100 yr BP (before present) is consistent with that expected on the basis of archaeological inference20. As organic carbon is a ubiquitous component of pictograph paints, this technique should be applicable to rock paintings throughout the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkland, F. & Newcomb, W. W. Jr Rock Art of Texas Indians (University of Texas Press, Austin, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shafer, H. J. Ancient Texans (Texas Monthly Austin, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pfeiffer, J. E. The Creative Explosion (Harper and Row, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breuil, A. H. Four Hundred Centuries of Cave Art (Hacker Art Books, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sieveking, A. The Cave Artists (Thames and Hudson, London, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorn, R. I. Quat. Res. 20, 49–73 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorn, R. I. & Whitley, D. S. Nature 302, 816–818 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorn, R. I. & Whitley, D. S. Ann. Ass. Am. Geogr. 42, 308–322 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorn, R. I. et al. Science 231, 830–833 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorn, R. I., Tanner, D. B., Turrin, D. & Dohrenwend, J. C. Phys. Geogr. 8, 72–81 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dorn, R. I., Turrin, B. D., Jull, A. J. T., Linick, T. W. & Donahue, D. J. Quat. Res. 28, 38–49 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whitley, D. S. & Dorn, R. I. World Archaeol. 19, 150–164 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nobbs, M. F. & Dorn, R. I. Rock Art Res. 5, 108–146 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van der Merwe, N. J., Sealey, J. & Yates, R. S. S. Afr. J. Sci. 83, 56–57 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Loy, T. H. et al. Antiquity 64, 110–116 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorblanchet, M. et al. Rock Art Res. 7, 4–20 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clottes, J., Menu, M. & Walter, P. Rock Art Res. 7, 21–26 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leroi-Gourhan, A. Treasures of Prehistoric Art (Abrams, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Barnes, F. A. Prehistoric Rock Art (Wasatch, Salt Lake City, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Turpin, S. An Overview of the Radiocarbon Chronology in the Lower Pecos River Region, Tex. Archaeol. Surv. Res. Rep. (University of Texas, Austin, in the press).

  21. Turpin, S. Seminole Canyon, Tex. Archaeol. Surv. Res. Rep. No. 83 (University of Texas. Austin, 1982).

  22. Gleit, C. E. & Hollahan, W. D. Analyt. Chem. 34, 1454–1457 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gleit, C. E. Analyt. Chem. 37, 314–315 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hollahan, J. R. J. chem. Educ. 43, A401–A416 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gluskoter, H. J. J. sedim. Petrol. 37, 205–214 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  26. De Vries, H. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. B61, 94–102 (1958).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deevey, E. S. Jr, Gross, M. S., Hutchison, G. E. & Graybill, H. L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 40, 285–288 (1954).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dorn, R. I., Jull, A. J. T., Donahue, D. J., Linick, T. W. & Toolin, L. J. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101, 1363–1372 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Peltier, S. & Duval, C. Analyt. chim. Acta 1, 345–354 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hyman, M. & Rowe, M. W. Tex. J. Sci. 42, 55–67 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russ, J., Hyman, M., Shafer, H. et al. Radiocarbon dating of prehistoric rock paintings by selective oxidation of organic carbon. Nature 348, 710–711 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/348710a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/348710a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing