Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection?

Abstract

IMAGES of artificial and natural scenes typically contain many highlights generated by mirror-like reflection from glossy surfaces. Until recently, computational models of visual processes have tended to regard highlights as obscuring the structure of the underlying scene. The truth is that, on the contrary, highlights are rich in local geometric information. Here we report that the three-dimensional appearance of a highlight on a computer-simu-lated stereoscopic curved surface affects observers' judgment of surface gloss. We also show that the 3-D appearance of a highlight affects the perception of surface curvature—that is, it can force an ambiguous convex–concave figure to change state. We thus conclude that human visual analysis seems to employ a physical model of the interaction of light with curved surfaces, a model firmly based on ray optics and differential geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blake, A. Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conf. on Artif. Intell. 973–976 (1985).

  2. Blake, A. & Brelstaff, G. J., Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. comp. Vis. 394–403 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington DC, 1988).

  3. Bülthoff, H. H. & Mallot, H. A. J. opt. Soc. Am. 5, 1749–1758 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Phong, B. T. Communs. Ass. comput. Mach. 18, 311–317 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beck, J. Surface Color Perception (Cornell University Press, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg, D. P. Science 244, 166–173 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Nature 297, 376–379 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blake, A. & Bülthoff, H. H. Artificial Intelligence Lab Memo 1149 (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramachandran, V. Nature 331, 163–166 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. Optica Acta 27, 7, 981–996 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayhew, J. E. W. & Frisby, J. P. Artif. Intel. J. 17, 349–385 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. Biol. Cybern. 21, 29–35 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zisserman, A., Giblin, P. & Blake, A. Image Vis. Comput. 7, 38–42 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blake, A., Bülthoff, H. Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection?. Nature 343, 165–168 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343165a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343165a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing