Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honey-bee colonies

Abstract

INSECT societies have long served as useful models in the study of two often intertwined issues in evolutionary biology: the levels at which natural selection operates1, and the phenomena of competition and cooperation in animal societies2. Hamilton3–5 provided a darwinian explanation for the evolution of cooperation by invoking natural selection for increased inclusive fitness, whereas Trivers and Hare6 showed how asymmetrical genetic relationships among members of hymenopteran societies result in differential fitness among queens and workers and can lead to conflict over the production of males. Here we provide evidence for competition among workers of the honey bee, Apis mellifera, in the production of female reproductives, a consequence of the genetic structure of colonies resulting from polyandry7, genotypic biases in components of cooperative behaviour associated with division of labour8–10, and kin recognition11–13. We also propose that nepotistic behaviour by honey bees is influenced by both kin- and colony-level selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Darwin, C. The Origin of Species 250–257 (Mentor, New York, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wheeler, W. H. Social Life Among the Insects 3–6 (Harcourt Brace, New York, 1923).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton, W. D. J. theor. Biol. 7, 17–52 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamilton, W. D. A. Rev. ecol. Syst. 3, 193–232 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trivers, R. L. & Hare, H. Science 191, 249–263 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Page, R. E. A. Rev. Entomol. 31, 297–320 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Calderone, N. W. & Page, R. E. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22, 17–25 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robinson, G. E. & Page, R. E. Nature 333, 356–358 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frumhoff, P. C. & Baker, J. Nature 333, 358–361 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Getz, W. M. & Smith, K. B. Nature 302, 147–148 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Frumhoff, P. C. & Schneider, S. Anim. Behav. 35, 255–262 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evers, C. A. & Seeley, T. D. Anim. Behav. 34, 924–925 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Page, R. E. & Laidlaw, H. H. Anim. Behav. 36, 944–945 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pamilo, P. & Crozier, R. H. Theor. Pop. Biol. 21, 171–193 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 691–778 (Freeman, San Francisco, 1981).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Page, R. E. & Erickson, E. H. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 77, 578–580 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Visscher, P. K. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 453–460 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Noonan, K. C. Ethology 73, 295–306 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Queller, D. C., Strassmann, J. E. & Hughes, C. R. Science 242, 1155–1157 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crow, J. F. Scient. Am. 240, 104–113 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sober, E. in PSA 1980 (eds Asquith, P. D. & Giere, R.) 93–121 (Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laidlaw, H. H. Instrumental Insemination of Honey Bee Queens (Dadant, Hamilton, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Contel, E. P. B., Mestriner, M. A. & Martins, E. Biochem. Genet. 15, 859–876 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moritz, R. F. A. J. Apic. Res. 24, 249–255 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laidlaw, H. H. & Page, R. E. Genetics 108, 985–997 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Winston, M. L. The Biology of the Honey Bee 181–213 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laidlaw, H. H., Contemporary Queen Rearing (Dadant, Hamilton, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Page, R., Robinson, G. & Fondrk, M. Genetic specialists, kin recognition and nepotism in honey-bee colonies. Nature 338, 576–579 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/338576a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/338576a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing