Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish


Mating systems are often viewed as a result of females choosing where, when and with whom to mate1,2, and of male responses to female behaviour3,4. If the distribution of females reflects their response to vital resources for survival and reproduction, then a careful study of these resources should yield predictions about the emergent mating system. Males and females could, however, simply gather at traditional sites to mate5. If so, analysis of the current state of the environment may yield incorrect predictions about mating sites5–9. Mating sites of the bluehead wrasse Thalassoma bifasciatum have remained in daily use over 12 years (four generations) without changing locations. Here, I show that experimental replacement of entire local populations led to the use of new sites, which continued to be used after the manipulations. Thus mating site locations may not be the result of individual assessment of current resource quality, but instead represent culturally transmitted traditions. Attempts to explain mating patterns based on the distribution of resources should therefore be approached with caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Parker, G. A. in Mate Choice (ed. Bateson. P.) 141–166 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Partridge, L. & Halliday, T. R. in Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 222–250 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emlen, S. T. & Oring, L. W. Science 197, 215–223 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vehrencamp, S. L. & Bradbury, J. W. in Behavioural Ecology, an Evolutionary Approach (eds Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B.) 251–278 (Sinauer, Sunderland, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parker, G. A. A. Rev. Ent. 23, 173–196 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonner, J. T. The Evolution of Culture in Animals (Princeton University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process (University of Chicago Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Galef, B. G. Jr. Adv. Study Behav. 6, 77–100 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mainardi, D. in Sociobiology: Bevond Nature/Nurture? (eds Barlow, G. W. & Silverberg, J.) 227–255 (Westview, Boulder. 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warner, R. R. & Robertson, D. R. Smithson. Contr. Zool. 254, 1–27 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, D. R. Copeia 1987, 637–642 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Warner, R. R. Anim. Behav. 35, 1470–1478 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Victor, B. C. Ecol. Monogr. 56, 145–160 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Randall, J. E. & Randall, H. A. Zoologica (N.Y.) 48, 49–60 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helfman, G. S. & Schullz, E. T. Anim. Behav. 32, 379–384 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Warner, R. R. Evolution 38, 148–162 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Searcy, W. A. Am. Nat. 114, 77–100 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pleszczynska, W. K. & Hansell, R. I. C. Am. Nat. 116, 821–830 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borgia, G. Evolution 36, 307–315 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thornhill, R. & Alcock, J. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems (Harvard University Press, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Shapiro, D. Y., Hensley, D. A. & Appeldoorn, R. S. Envir. biol. Fish. 22, 3–14 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Warner, R. R. Proc. Fifth Int. Coral Reef Congress 4, 145–150 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lill, A. Z. Tierpsychol. 36, 513–530 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertson, D. R. & Hoffman, S. G. Z. Tierpsychol. 45, 298–320 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradbury, J. W., Gibson, R. & Tsai, I. M. Anim. Behav. 34, 1694–1709 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Warner, R. R. & Hoffmann, S. G. Evolution 34, 508–518.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warner, R. Traditionality of mating-site preferences in a coral reef fish. Nature 335, 719–721 (1988).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing