The structure–function relationship of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) has been effectively studied by the combination of complementary DNA manipulation and single-channel current analysis1–6. Previous work with chimaeras between the Torpedo californica and bovine AChR δ-subunits has shown that the region comprising the hydrophobic segment M2 and its vicinity contains an important determinant of the rate of ion transport through the AChR channel5. It has also been suggested that this region is responsible for the reduction in channel conductance caused by divalent cations5 and that segment M2 contributes to the binding site of noncompetitive antagonists7,8. To identify those amino acid residues that interact with permeating ions, we have introduced various point mutations into the Torpedo AChR subunit cDNAs to alter the net charge of the charged or glutamine residues around the proposed transmembrane segments9–15. The single-channel conductance properties of these AChR mutants expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes indicate that three clusters of negatively charged and glutamine residues neighbouring segment M2 of the α-, β-, γ- and δ-subunits, probably forming three anionic rings, are major determinants of the rate of ion transport.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Communications Biology Open Access 03 October 2018
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Mishina, M. et al. Nature 307, 604–608 (1984).
Mishina, M. et al. Nature 313, 364–369 (1985).
Sakmann, B. et al. Nature 318, 538–543 (1985).
Mishina, M. et al. Nature 321, 406–411 (1986).
Imoto, K. et al. Nature 324, 670–674 (1986).
Tobimatsu, T. et al. FEBS Lett. 222, 56–62 (1987).
Giraudat, J., Dennis, M., Heidmann, T., Chang, J.-Y. & Changeux, J.-P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 2719–2723 (1986).
Hucho, F., Oberthür, W. & Lottspeich, F. FEBS Lett. 205, 137–142 (1986).
Noda, M. et al. Nature 299, 793–797 (1982).
Noda, M. et al. Nature 301, 251–255 (1983).
Noda, M. et al. Nature 302, 528–532 (1983).
Claudio, T., Ballivet, M., Patrick, J. & Heinemann, S. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 1111–1115 (1983).
Devillers-Thiery, A., Giraudat, J., Bentaboulet, M. & Changeux, J.-P. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80, 2067–2071 (1983).
Guy, H. R. Biophys. J. 45, 249–261 (1984).
Finer-Moore, J. & Stroud, R. M. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81, 155–159 (1984).
Brisson, A. & Unwin, P. N. T. Nature 315, 474–477 (1985).
Takai, T. et al. Nature 315, 761–764 (1985).
Takai, T. et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 143, 109–115 (1984).
Witzemann, V., Barg, B., Nishikawa, Y., Sakmann, B. & Numa, S. FEBS Lett. 223, 104–112 (1987).
Shibahara, S. et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 146, 15–22 (1985).
Yu, L., LaPolla, R. J. & Davidson, N. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 3539–3555 (1986).
Boulter, J. et al. J. Neurosci. Res. 16, 37–49 (1986).
Boulter, J. et al. Nature 319, 368–374 (1986).
Schofield, P. R. et al. Nature 328, 221–227 (1987).
Grenningloh, G. et al. Nature 328, 215–220 (1987).
Kubo, T. et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 149, 5–13 (1985).
Zoller, M. J. & Smith, M. Meth. Enzym. 100, 468–500 (1983).
Nakamaye, K. L. & Eckstein, F. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 9679–9698 (1986).
Melton, D. A. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7035–7056 (1984).
Methfessel, C. et al. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 407, 577–588 (1986).
About this article
Cite this article
Imoto, K., Busch, C., Sakmann, B. et al. Rings of negatively charged amino acids determine the acetylcholine receptor channel conductance. Nature 335, 645–648 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1038/335645a0
This article is cited by
Communications Biology (2018)
Nature Chemical Biology (2012)
Nature Chemical Biology (2012)